GeForce RTX 3090 Founder review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X TRIO review
Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPRO OC review
Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVMe SSD review
GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 SG review
Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 TUF Gaming review
GeForce RTX 3080 Founder review
Gigabyte B550 Vision D review
Radeon RX 470 Benchmarks
In the slide-deck that was released yesterday some benchmark numbers have been, well almost hidden. But they are there. I added them into two charts to check out.
Let me clearly state that the benchmarks have been performed by AMD so we cannot verify quality settings. The scores have been derived from the footnotes of the PDF:
Polaris 10 2.8x performance per watt: Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of May 10, 2016 on the AMD Radeon™ RX 470 (110w) and AMD Radeon™ R9 270X (180w),ona test systemcomprising i7 5960X @ 3.0 GHz 16GB memory, AMD Radeon Software driver 16.20 and Windows 10.. Using 3DMark Fire Strike preset 1080p the scores were 9090 and 5787 respectively. Using Ashes ofthe Singularity 1080P High, the scores were 46 fps and 28.1 fps respectively. Using Hitman 1080p High, the scores were 60 fpsand 27.6 fps respectively. Using Overwatch1080p Max settings, the scoreswere 121 fps and 76 fps respectively. Using Performance/Board power, the resulting average across the 4 different titles was a perf per watt of 2.8X vs the Radeon R9 270X. Test results are not average andmay vary.
Good to see is that they used a test-setup that matches ours:
Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of June 10, 2016 on the Radeon™ RX 480 8GB and R9 380 on a test system comprising Intel i7-5960X, 16GB DDR4-2666 RAM, GigabyteX99-UD4, Radeon Software Crimson Edition 16.1.1, and Win10 64-bit. Using the Steam VR Performance test, Radeon RX 480 scored 6.3 and Radeon R9 380 scored 3.6. Performance may vary based onuse of latest driver versions. Test results are not average and may vary.
BTW theres also mention of a mobile part called AMD Radeon RX 480M based on Polaris 11:
Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of May 10, 2016 on 3DMark 11 and 3DMark Firestrikeusing a test system comprising of an i7-4600M, 8GB, AMD Radeon driver 16.20. AMD Radeon R9 M280X (14CUs) scored 5700 and 3500 with a board power of 82W. AMD Radeon RX 480M (16CUs) scored 7200 and 4070 with a board power of 35W. Using Performance/Board power, the resulting average across the 2 different titles was a perf per watt of 2.8X vs the Radeon R9 M280X .
The RX 470 would use roughly 110W, benchmarks used are 3DMarl FireStrike, Ashes of the Singularity, Hitman and Overwatch. The card is only being compared to a 270X, however FireStrike is normalized and was placed into our regular chart:
Here you go, have a peek:
More Info on Radeon RX 460 - 470 and 480 from new Slide deck - 06/14/2016 08:48 PM
So I just received a new slide-deck from AMD moments ago, in which they tease the Radeon RX 460 - 470 and 480 in a PDF slide-deck. The good news, It's cleared to post these, the bad news it not a lo...
AMD unveiling Radeon RX product stack with 480 - 470 and 460 - 06/14/2016 09:24 AM
AMD has presented they will release two new graphics cards: the RX 470 and RX 460. The two cards are positioned below the previously announced RX 480. Although it is not mentioned, it is rather likely...
SAPPHIRE Radeon RX 480 NITRO 8GB - 06/13/2016 11:15 AM
Some photos of what seems to be SAPPHIRE Radeon RX 480 NITRO 8GB have surfaced on the WWW. The card from Sapphire is their Nitro model and will be a dual-slot dual-fan based product....
AMD Radeon Rx 480 3DMark 11 Performance Benchmark Surfaces #2 - 06/11/2016 08:41 AM
I'll post a little addendum on the news coverage from yesterday where a Radeon Rx 480 3DMark 11 Performance surfaced at futuremark. Yesterday I didn't look too deeply into the database, however eve...
AMD Radeon Rx 480 3DMark 11 Performance Benchmark Surfaces - 06/10/2016 01:53 PM
Yes, I am fairly certain this is the real thing you guys, in the Futuremark database an entry appeared under device ID 67DF:C7, that Hardware ID has been tied to the AMD Radeon RX 480 for a while no...
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 10782
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 10782
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5289943 Posted on: 06/15/2016 12:16 PM
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
Forcing? No. It is your choice to buy or not.
At this moment, you can go and buy GTX 980Ti at good price.
What AMD is about to do, is to deliver record bump in performance without greatly inflating price. Quite opposite, isn't it? Price seems rather good.
Polaris is just bit small, entry level desktops and midrange solutions. +What looks like great step on mobile front.
You'll get taste now and you'll be able to approximate Vega. For which you can wait half of a year.
Always your choice.
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
Forcing? No. It is your choice to buy or not.
At this moment, you can go and buy GTX 980Ti at good price.
What AMD is about to do, is to deliver record bump in performance without greatly inflating price. Quite opposite, isn't it? Price seems rather good.
Polaris is just bit small, entry level desktops and midrange solutions. +What looks like great step on mobile front.
You'll get taste now and you'll be able to approximate Vega. For which you can wait half of a year.
Always your choice.
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5392
Joined: 2003-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 5392
Joined: 2003-09-15
#5289947 Posted on: 06/15/2016 12:31 PM
You're actually looking at more money though.
RX 480 8GB crossfire will be roughly £478
GTX1070 is roughly £400, some cheaper, some more expensive.
On the otherhand, it'll probably beat both pascal cards in supported games.
You're actually looking at more money though.
RX 480 8GB crossfire will be roughly £478
GTX1070 is roughly £400, some cheaper, some more expensive.
On the otherhand, it'll probably beat both pascal cards in supported games.
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 6099
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 6099
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5289956 Posted on: 06/15/2016 12:42 PM
edit: nvm.
edit: nvm.
Embra
Senior Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: 2014-11-19
Senior Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: 2014-11-19
#5289962 Posted on: 06/15/2016 12:51 PM
We will have to wait for Vega to see higher end GPUs. I do not understand why everyone is comparing these cards to the 1070/1080. They are mainstream gpus.
It seems they some nvidia fans just want a higher cheaper permforming card to force prices down on the 1070/1080.
We will have to wait for Vega to see higher end GPUs. I do not understand why everyone is comparing these cards to the 1070/1080. They are mainstream gpus.
It seems they some nvidia fans just want a higher cheaper permforming card to force prices down on the 1070/1080.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: 2015-01-16
So basicly AMD is forcing people into Crossfire to get the same Performance as a 1070 for Less Money.
Sucks if you hate Crossfire and want Single Card performance of the 1070.
No. These cards are meant for people who either can't afford or simply aren't interested in a higher end (more expensive) card like 1070 and upward. It's silly to think 1070 would be some kind of a standard level of performance everybody must have to be able to play their Dota or whatever. You can play 99% of games out there just fine with less power than 1070's, maybe not on uber settings, but play nonetheless.
AMD's answer to 1070 and 1080 is still basically nothing but rumours and idle talk.
Hilarious the amount of people on here who believe if you don't have the best there must be something wrong with the product.