Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Corsair 2000D RGB Airflow Mini-ITX - PC chassis review
ASUS PG27AQDM Review - 240Hz 1440p OLED monitor
MSI MAG X670E Tomahawk WiFi review
Radeon R9 Fury specs Appear Online
And with Radeon R9 Fury we obviously mean the non X model, that will be air-cooled. Apparently this card will be cut down a bit towards 3584 Stream Processors by enabling only 56 of the 64 compute units on the GPU.
Website TweakTown is reporting this info at the moment, albeit the source is not indicated:
According to our industry insiders, the Radeon R9 Fury will feature 3584 Stream Processors, down from the 4096 on the full Fury X. The Fiji-based GPU will be clocked at 1050MHz, which is identical to that of the Fury X. We have 4GB of High Bandwidth Memory that provides the same 512GB/sec of bandwidth, clocked at 500MHz (1GHz effective). We are being told to expect temperatures of the Fiji PRO-based R9 Fury to be less than 75C, which is considerably higher than the 50C or so from the watercooled Fury X.
The biggest difference between the Fury and Fury X is that the Fury is air-cooled, with AIB partners able to put on their respective coolers onto the card. The other big difference is that the Fiji PRO GPU is what is powering the Fury, with 512 less Stream Processors. We shouldn't expect performance to be that much less, probably 10-15% less than Fury X. But, without that huge radiator and pump, we're going to have an impressive card to combat the GeForce GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti.
ASUS Preps Radeon R9 Fury STRIX with DirectCU III Cooler ? - 07/06/2015 08:44 AM
AMD is to launch the regular air-cooled Fury series (without the X) soon and all of the sudden at a price-watch entry a ASUS Radeon R9 Fury STRIX with DirectCU III pops up. ...
Review: PowerColor Radeon R9 390 PCS+ - 07/01/2015 06:28 PM
We benchmark and review the Radeon R9 390 PCS+ from powerColor, obviously the 8GB edition. It comes fitted with a massive triple slot air cooler keeping this product under 70 Degrees C, that's under ...
EK-FC R9 Fury X a AMD Radeon R9 FURY (X) Full Cover water block - 06/26/2015 09:14 AM
EK is showing a preliminary model of how they feel what liquid cooling should look like on the Radeon R9 Fury X with their EK-FC R9 Fury X water block....
Review: AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - 06/26/2015 09:13 AM
Fury has reigned upon us and as such we review the new Radeon R9 Fury X from AMD. We will benchmark, test and analyze the card in-depth. There's a lot to tell about this 4096 shader processor based...
MSI Launches Radeon R9 Fury X Graphics Card - 06/25/2015 09:07 AM
With the MSI R9 Fury X 4G, MSI adds a new high-end graphics card to its recently introduced and already heavily awarded AMD R9 and R7 300 series range....
Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 19558
Joined: 2010-04-21
Senior Member
Posts: 19558
Joined: 2010-04-21
#5115622 Posted on: 07/06/2015 02:12 PM
Makes sense to me, basically saying for the price, it's great as it competes with the 980, but it won't touch the 980ti
Makes sense to me, basically saying for the price, it's great as it competes with the 980, but it won't touch the 980ti
cuneytcam
Junior Member
Posts: 10
Joined: 2015-02-09
Junior Member
Posts: 10
Joined: 2015-02-09
#5115784 Posted on: 07/06/2015 05:49 PM
Fury X is getting less than 10% more performance with OC but with a much higher pricetag. I can't see a cutdown Fiji chip outperform 980 tbh, not if you overclock both. Maxwell scales and overclocks too good. And the price seems to be higher than 980 anyway..
Fiji XT is rumored to have ROP bottleneck. If those rumors are remotely accurate and rop count remains at 64x in Fiji Pro, performance drop should be few percentages. This product can be bang for buck for higher segment of graphics cards. If AMD is preparing above average driver for w10 fiji pro is probably what im going to buy. Strangely enough I would hate to experience kepler gpus got shafted after maxwell was released.
Even though it is a rumor, less than optimal driver tweaks for reviews and gtx970 memory f.k up as a fact, makes me lean towards for amd gpus. I want to know what im buying beforehand and not after the sale is done
Fury X is getting less than 10% more performance with OC but with a much higher pricetag. I can't see a cutdown Fiji chip outperform 980 tbh, not if you overclock both. Maxwell scales and overclocks too good. And the price seems to be higher than 980 anyway..
Fiji XT is rumored to have ROP bottleneck. If those rumors are remotely accurate and rop count remains at 64x in Fiji Pro, performance drop should be few percentages. This product can be bang for buck for higher segment of graphics cards. If AMD is preparing above average driver for w10 fiji pro is probably what im going to buy. Strangely enough I would hate to experience kepler gpus got shafted after maxwell was released.
Even though it is a rumor, less than optimal driver tweaks for reviews and gtx970 memory f.k up as a fact, makes me lean towards for amd gpus. I want to know what im buying beforehand and not after the sale is done
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 6365
Joined: 2010-10-17
Senior Member
Posts: 6365
Joined: 2010-10-17
#5115847 Posted on: 07/06/2015 06:55 PM
At least 4 GB MEANS 4 GB
At least 4 GB MEANS 4 GB
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Joined: 2011-09-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Joined: 2011-09-21
#5115856 Posted on: 07/06/2015 07:05 PM
It's competing against a real 4GB card. Beat a dead horse much.
Fiji XT is rumored to have ROP bottleneck. If those rumors are remotely accurate and rop count remains at 64x in Fiji Pro, performance drop should be few percentages. This product can be bang for buck for higher segment of graphics cards. If AMD is preparing above average driver for w10 fiji pro is probably what im going to buy. Strangely enough I would hate to experience kepler gpus got shafted after maxwell was released.
Even though it is a rumor, less than optimal driver tweaks for reviews and gtx970 memory f.k up as a fact, makes me lean towards for amd gpus. I want to know what im buying beforehand and not after the sale is done
Really my 670's don't feel like they have been gimped in any way.
It's competing against a real 4GB card. Beat a dead horse much.
Fiji XT is rumored to have ROP bottleneck. If those rumors are remotely accurate and rop count remains at 64x in Fiji Pro, performance drop should be few percentages. This product can be bang for buck for higher segment of graphics cards. If AMD is preparing above average driver for w10 fiji pro is probably what im going to buy. Strangely enough I would hate to experience kepler gpus got shafted after maxwell was released.
Even though it is a rumor, less than optimal driver tweaks for reviews and gtx970 memory f.k up as a fact, makes me lean towards for amd gpus. I want to know what im buying beforehand and not after the sale is done
Really my 670's don't feel like they have been gimped in any way.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 284
Joined: 2007-06-05
"We shouldn't expect performance to be that much less, probably 10-15% less than Fury X. But, without that huge radiator and pump, we're going to have an impressive card to combat the GeForce GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti"
Ehm what? This statement makes no sense, FuryX is barely enough to compete with the 980Ti. The fury will be a fantastic card since it should outperform the 980 with a great price but leave the 980Ti out of the equation...