Radeon Fury X Beats GeForce GTX Titan X and Fury to GTX 980 Ti: 3DMark

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/17/2015 02:38 PM | source: | 388 comment(s)

Well, at least to these leaked slides that just surfaced on the web. The tests are posted by Korean tech publication ITCM.co.kr. R9 Fury X score higher than the GTX Titan X in all three tests, while the R9 Fury is almost as fast as the GTX 980 Ti.

These benchmarks should be taken with a huge grain of salt of course, I think they are artificially calculated. I say so as the name in the charts seem to refer to DG Lee, famous for posting 'guestimated' results on the web claiming they are real. But hey .. have a peek and obviously as always, draw your own conclusions.

Source: ITCM (Korea)

Related Stories

3DMark Firemark Scores Radeon Fury X surfaces - but are they real ? - 06/11/2015 06:42 AM
The first benchmarks of the AMD Radeon Fury X “Fiji” GPU have been posted yesterday, today however FutureMark 3DMark Firestrike Scores appeared magically shortly thereafter. There are a few things odd about them though.

AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL - 06/10/2015 05:47 PM
So the funny thing about people as that once they have hardware, they test stuff and sometimes forget that the results of a benchmark are inserted into a database, which is publicly available. AMD Rad...

AMD unofficially confirms Radeon Flagship – R9 390X - Launches at Computex - 03/05/2015 07:41 PM
Over at GDC AMD did not announce the pending Radeon R9 390X flagship just yet as many had hoped - then again, they kind of did. The Fiji XT based monster was apparently powering the Showdown demo o...

78 pages 1 2 3 4 > »

kinggavin
Senior Member

Posts: 297
Joined: 2014-11-06

#5098461 Posted on: 06/17/2015 07:38 AM

AMD cards are powerful but gpus are made for gaming and thats where amd problem is because nvidia has most of the games (ie) the physx and the gameworks if u want the fancy extras in your game u need nvidia card also nvidia have the better game driver support over amd , i think its main reason nvidia are on top and biggest problem for amd sales more games are optimized for nvidia got gameworks and better drivers

Cartman372
Senior Member

Posts: 1469
Joined: 2008-01-13

#5098462 Posted on: 06/17/2015 07:45 AM

It's funny, AMD always gets **** on when the discussion of drivers come up. I ran my HD4850 for 6ish years and not once during that time frame did I have a driver related game issue. In fact the only problem I had with that card was the inadequate single slot cooler. Had to put on an Arctic Cooling unit at some point.

Atombender
Senior Member

Posts: 2521
Joined: 2002-11-08

#5098470 Posted on: 06/17/2015 08:02 AM

Very interesting. Even at UHD the Fury X (with "only" 4GB HBM) is still sligthly faster than the Titan X with it's whopping 12 GB memory.

Robbo9999
Senior Member

Posts: 1782
Joined: 2012-10-07

#5098471 Posted on: 06/17/2015 08:03 AM

So the Fury X is on the next node of 16nm and Titan X/980ti is still 28nm, yet Fury X only narrowly beats the Titan X!? This means that once NVidia go to 16nm with Pascal then AMD will be obliterated! If the FuryX was on 28nm this would be a good achievement right, but the fact it's on 16nm, should be way better performance if they're gonna compete against NVidia. (Think I've got it right that FuryX is on 16nm - correct me if you know I'm wrong).

Blackops_2
Senior Member

Posts: 319
Joined: 2011-07-12

#5098473 Posted on: 06/17/2015 08:10 AM

Yup, my 4890 and 7970 never had any issues. Meanwhile i have two rigs with 780 Classies that are crashing at least twice a week now. But Nvidia sure does put out flawless drivers... :3eyes:

Both are stock, never been OCed. My point is it goes both ways.

Anyhow i hope the leaks are true and Fury is faster than Titan X so competition will ensue..

78 pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.