Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4255
GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.2 WHQL download
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta3 Download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1
CPU-Z download v2.05
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.02.19.2221


New Forum Topics
NVIDIA GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver Download & Discussion Diablo IV Beta Reportedly Causing Issues with GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Potentially Leading to Card Failure FSR Thread AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.3.2 WHQL - Driver Download and Discussion G.SKILL Announces OC World Cup 2023 Competition with $40,000 USD Cash Prize Pool Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Release Discovery 22.12.2 WHQL 531.41 - Clean Version Intel i225 firmware NVIDIA GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver Download & Discussion Afterburner - OSD "skin"




Guru3D.com » News » Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results

Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/26/2015 08:09 PM | source: | 117 comment(s)
Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results

As you guys know, DirectX 12 is going to greatly free up processor utilization, and thus your games can make more draw-calls with your processor. More efficient usage of CPUs with multiple cores is trivial in the design. We can now test a thing or two out thanks to the 3DMark update released hours ago.

At this very moment with DirectX 11, no matter how many cores your CPU has, the first core does the majority of the hard work for the API, the rest of the cores doing very little. With DirectX 12 (and Mantle), the data-sets and this load will be better distributed and utilized meaning a far more efficient design usage, this removes certain CPU bottlenecks. DX12 is said to be capable of using as many as eight cores and hey, AMD has very nicely priced 8-core processors right ? But how can we test to see what is up and coming ?
 


 

Well, even you yourself can check that out @home now. If you own a 3DMark 2013 license and have Windows 10 preview build 10041 (free to download and install as it is a public preview) and have a compatible graphics card with DX12 enabled you can now test and see how huge that overhead always has been with 3DMark. Just make sure you update Windows 10 towards build 10041 which has DX12 support. For the graphics card drivers, wait for the Windows update. The Windows driver that install through the update are DX12 class compatible with respective Nvidia and AMD graphics cards.

The test works by tasking the GPU to draw something on the screen, literally this is what a draw call is, a request from the game engine on the processor to draw and render an object, period. This instruction goes through the API, that API would be DX11, DX12, or AMD's Mantle.
 


 

The less efficient the API is in handling the what we explained are "draw calls" from the CPU to the GPU, the fewer objects can be drawn on your monitor. 3DMark now has this test, and will speed up draw calls and objects until the frame rate drops under 30 frames per second (fps) and that is its equilibrium. The result is what we can show as the difference in number of draw calls per API. Our test has been performed at 1920x1080 (default is 1280x720 I think it was), just to make things a little heavier and more representative. Check out these numbers man, specifically in the jump from DX 11 towards Mantle and then DirectX 12. Mantle actually is a notch faster compared to DX12, still ... what a difference. 
 


Intel Core i7-5960X (16 threads) / Radeon R9 290X 
 

Our test system is absed on the following hardware:

  • Intel Core i7-5960X (16 threads)
  • AMD Radeon R9 290X
  • MSI X99S XPower AC
  • 16GB GSKILL DDR4-2133 Quad channel
  • Corsair Force SSD

The difference in increase draw calls is going to be extraordinary positive. Obviously the results are relative to actual complex rendered frames and frame rates. But any old and or new processor will be utilized so much better. In the end the Windows 10 / DX12 combo is going to make a difference alright, yeah we are excited as man. Scene complexity with many more objects is going to rock hard. I mean overall we are looking at a 15 to 20x draw call increase on any mainstream to enthusiast class processor and what that can do with scene complexity will be very impressive. Also this means very good news for AMD and its APUs and FX processors as well as the entry level Intel CPU SKUs.

Yeah DirectX 12 could be a game-changer (literally) once widely adopted by the software houses, as such we feel this release is going to be EPIC. Go try it out yourself and let us know your results in the forums. You can download the updated 3DMark right here.

 



Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results




« Micron and Intel Unveil New 3D NAND Flash Memory · Quick test: DirectX 12 API Overhead Benchmark results · GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 3072 CUDA Cores and 6GB of GDDR5 »

24 pages « < 4 5 6 7 > »


PrMinisterGR
Senior Member



Posts: 8099
Joined: 2014-09-27

#5038589 Posted on: 03/26/2015 10:32 PM
Well well... AMD's DX11 CPU efficiency is abysmal. Who would have guessed... :D

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 45876
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5038593 Posted on: 03/26/2015 10:40 PM
This thread is about the massive potential DX12 offers, so let's not make this yet another boring and irritating AMD versus Nvidia bashing shall we ?

Wagnard
Senior Member



Posts: 2702
Joined: 2010-08-18

#5038607 Posted on: 03/26/2015 11:06 PM
Here is another run on the 970 at 1920x1080 this time. (by default its 720p)


koukosklan
Unregistered



#5038616 Posted on: 03/26/2015 11:19 PM
can we see a test with someone using an AMD FX processor maybe? wanna see how those extra cores get utilized here compared to intel

Extraordinary
Senior Member



Posts: 19558
Joined: 2010-04-21

#5038619 Posted on: 03/26/2015 11:21 PM
^^ You've got one lol

24 pages « < 4 5 6 7 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023