Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review

New Downloads
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5640 beta
CrystalDiskInfo 8.11.2 Download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.3 driver download
GPU-Z Download v2.37.0


New Forum Topics
Review: MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO Radeon RX 6700 XT would have a starting price of 479 USD and see better availability AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.2.3 RTSS 6.7.0 beta 1 NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2021 GeForce 461.72 WHQL drivers: download & discussion AMD announces Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB at 479 USD, launches on March 18th MSI has released Motherboard BIOS's for AGESA 1.2.0.0 Intel Re-Confirms March 30 for Rocket Lake-S Launch [Mod Driver] NimeZ Radeon Software - Signature Edition




Guru3D.com » News » Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10

Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/26/2018 07:22 AM | source: | 22 comment(s)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10

Microsoft announced Windows 10 for ARM in December 2016, now a review of a Windows 2-in-1 unit armed with Snapdragon 835-soc reveals the Snapdragon 835 isn't performing well good with x86 programs, compared to even a Celeron N3450 (entry-level laptops and tablets). 

Tests conducted by TechSpot, who posted a review of the HP Envy x2 equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835-soc whos some results with Chrome, Photoshop, Excel, Word, Netflix, Plex, and Steam. A lot of software did not work either. 

Synthetic benchmarks that did work showed that PCMark 8, Cinebench R11.5, x264 HD Benchmark 5, Handbrake and Photoshop would not perform better than a laptop with a Celeron N3450. And since there's are always exceptions, WinRAR 5.0, 7-Zip, Excel and 3DMark did perform better. TechSpot does mention that the battery life of the HP Envy x2 is extremely long, however with a 1000 USD price tag, not relevant for the market.



Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10




« MSI (India) Pretty Much Just Called Radeon GPUs "Sub par" · Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 · TerraMaster D5 Thunderbolt 3 RAID Storage Device »

Related Stories

Trump halts Qualcomm takeover by Broadcom for national security - 03/13/2018 07:58 AM
In an unexpected turn of events, the American president Donald Trump blocks the takeover of chipmaker Qualcomm by Broadcom, for reasons of national security....

Qualcomm Introduces Atheros WCN3998 with 802.11ax, WPA3 and Bluetooth 5.1 - 02/22/2018 05:55 PM
While multiple routers are already available with 802.11ax, Qualcomm now announces an 802.11ax network chip that can be used for mobile devices, the successor towards 802.11ac could double or even qu...

Samsung and Qualcomm Working on 7nm EUV Process Technology - 02/22/2018 10:21 AM
Samsung announced the intention to expand their decade-long foundry relationship into EUV (extreme ultra violet) lithography process technology, including the manufacture of future Qualcomm Snapdrago...

Qualcomm rejects Broadcom bid of 121 billion dollars - 02/16/2018 04:45 PM
In what has to become one of the biggest ICT deals ever, American chip company Qualcomm has rejected the bid of no less than 121 billion dollars from its American counterpart Broadcom....

EU Antitrust: Commission fines Qualcomm €997 million - 01/24/2018 02:44 PM
The European Commission has fined Qualcomm €997m for abusing its market dominance in LTE baseband chipsets. Qualcomm prevented rivals from competing in the market by making significant payme...


5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


sykozis



Posts: 21797
Joined: 2008-07-14

#5535008 Posted on: 04/05/2018 04:26 AM
I was pointing out that Chrome should have an ARM compatible version by now, since it is used in many ARM devices (Android phones?), including Chromebooks iirc. Easy Enough ? ;)

ChromeOS is Linux based and the browser is built into the UI for ChromeOS. Android is also Linux based. So, yes, there is an ARM compatible version of Chrome. It was just never intended to run on Windows and can not be ported to Windows without missing features. Google will have to develop another variant of the Chrome browser for Windows on ARM.

Mundosold
Senior Member



Posts: 218
Joined: 2012-10-04

#5535487 Posted on: 04/06/2018 02:09 PM
It's not a bad start. Most software is going to be running in emulated x86 mode, which is going to be extremely slow (but compatible). It would be interesting to see what happens if developers start developing and compiling for Windows-ARM for native speed.

I guarantee Intel isn't looking at these charts and breathing a sigh of relief. I guarantee they are using every shady/illegal tactic in the book to make sure that these ARM-based books are priced high and don't replace X86 - it is a direct assault on one of their few remaining markets.

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021