Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review

New Downloads
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5640 beta
CrystalDiskInfo 8.11.2 Download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.3 driver download
GPU-Z Download v2.37.0


New Forum Topics
RTSS 6.7.0 beta 1 NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2021 GeForce 461.72 WHQL drivers: download & discussion AMD announces Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB at 479 USD, launches on March 18th MSI has released Motherboard BIOS's for AGESA 1.2.0.0 Intel Re-Confirms March 30 for Rocket Lake-S Launch AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.2.3 [Mod Driver] NimeZ Radeon Software - Signature Edition GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download Review: MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO




Guru3D.com » News » Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10

Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/26/2018 07:22 AM | source: | 22 comment(s)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10

Microsoft announced Windows 10 for ARM in December 2016, now a review of a Windows 2-in-1 unit armed with Snapdragon 835-soc reveals the Snapdragon 835 isn't performing well good with x86 programs, compared to even a Celeron N3450 (entry-level laptops and tablets). 

Tests conducted by TechSpot, who posted a review of the HP Envy x2 equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835-soc whos some results with Chrome, Photoshop, Excel, Word, Netflix, Plex, and Steam. A lot of software did not work either. 

Synthetic benchmarks that did work showed that PCMark 8, Cinebench R11.5, x264 HD Benchmark 5, Handbrake and Photoshop would not perform better than a laptop with a Celeron N3450. And since there's are always exceptions, WinRAR 5.0, 7-Zip, Excel and 3DMark did perform better. TechSpot does mention that the battery life of the HP Envy x2 is extremely long, however with a 1000 USD price tag, not relevant for the market.



Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10




« MSI (India) Pretty Much Just Called Radeon GPUs "Sub par" · Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 · TerraMaster D5 Thunderbolt 3 RAID Storage Device »

Related Stories

Trump halts Qualcomm takeover by Broadcom for national security - 03/13/2018 07:58 AM
In an unexpected turn of events, the American president Donald Trump blocks the takeover of chipmaker Qualcomm by Broadcom, for reasons of national security....

Qualcomm Introduces Atheros WCN3998 with 802.11ax, WPA3 and Bluetooth 5.1 - 02/22/2018 05:55 PM
While multiple routers are already available with 802.11ax, Qualcomm now announces an 802.11ax network chip that can be used for mobile devices, the successor towards 802.11ac could double or even qu...

Samsung and Qualcomm Working on 7nm EUV Process Technology - 02/22/2018 10:21 AM
Samsung announced the intention to expand their decade-long foundry relationship into EUV (extreme ultra violet) lithography process technology, including the manufacture of future Qualcomm Snapdrago...

Qualcomm rejects Broadcom bid of 121 billion dollars - 02/16/2018 04:45 PM
In what has to become one of the biggest ICT deals ever, American chip company Qualcomm has rejected the bid of no less than 121 billion dollars from its American counterpart Broadcom....

EU Antitrust: Commission fines Qualcomm €997 million - 01/24/2018 02:44 PM
The European Commission has fined Qualcomm €997m for abusing its market dominance in LTE baseband chipsets. Qualcomm prevented rivals from competing in the market by making significant payme...


5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Evildead666
Senior Member



Posts: 1302
Joined: 2003-09-14

#5531839 Posted on: 03/26/2018 07:00 PM
Read the link. Chrome runs as an emulated application, while Edge runs native. Basically, essential Microsoft applications can run Natively on ARM.

What, so MS decide what runs natively, and what doesn't ?
They must have gimped it somehow..... ;)

vbetts
Moderator



Posts: 15107
Joined: 2006-07-04

#5531843 Posted on: 03/26/2018 07:03 PM
What, so MS decide what runs natively, and what doesn't ?
They must have gimped it somehow..... ;)
No, the developer has to include arm support if they want arm support.

Evildead666
Senior Member



Posts: 1302
Joined: 2003-09-14

#5531847 Posted on: 03/26/2018 07:10 PM
No, the developer has to include arm support if they want arm support.

So google didn't include ARM support ? I find that strange....or i'm not understanding it right. :)

vbetts
Moderator



Posts: 15107
Joined: 2006-07-04

#5531848 Posted on: 03/26/2018 07:12 PM
So google didn't include ARM support ? I find that strange....or i'm not understanding it right. :)

Probably not an executable ARM version for Windows yet. Could possibly release one sooner or later, but this kind of seems like the only product like it...

Evildead666
Senior Member



Posts: 1302
Joined: 2003-09-14

#5531856 Posted on: 03/26/2018 07:28 PM
I would bet that somehow Edge will be the only browser 'optimized' for WinARM, but then again, i'm jaded like that ;)

I really don't see this taking off, Atom chips were supposed to be low power, and actually work really well when configured properly.

(Sort of off topic below):
I just recouped a Acer Aspire E11, dual core atom with N2840. Changed the 2GB of Kingston RAM for 8GB of RAM, and replaced the something-rpm 500GB HDD with a 120GB mSATA SSD (in a 2.5" adaptor) and I am so surprised at how responsive and fast it is.
It seems better than my old Athlon x2 laptop with SSD and 4/8GB RAM.
Will have to run some tests on it to compare it and the WinARM stuff, like PC Mark 8 and such.... I have Win10 installed via USB key, and btw, it still activates for free. No need for a licence.
I did a fresh install of Win10, as it wouldn't let me upgrade. Kept the partition layout though, so the key might be hidden in one of the OEM partitions, but I doubt it.

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021