ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
QNIX QX320QHD 32" Monitor has 2560 x 1440 pixels
QNIX launched the QX320QHD, a new 32" sized screen in their range. The QX320QHD offers a similar set of features and specs to the QX2710 we tested recently, although that may well mean some of the claims are a little "adventurous". Regardless the 32" screen offers a 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Their spec sheets list the screen with an AUO A-HVA panel (IPS-type), but the other listed specs suggest it is more likely to be an AMVA panel, like that used in the BenQ BL3200PT. As far as we know, AUO aren't currently manufacturing a 32" AHVA panel, so it looks likely that it is in fact the same AMVA panel (M320DVN01.0) as the BenQ alternative.
The screen also offers a 5ms G2G response time, 3000:1 contrast ratio, 300 cd/m2 brightness and 178/178 viewing angles. It is W-LED backlit with a standard sRGB gamut. Connectivity wise there are DL-DVI, DisplayPort and HDMI available and so being a multi-input monitor it is extremely unlikely that it can be overclocked very much if at all. The spec lists overclocking as a feature, but we saw from that QX2710 that while you can happily run the screen up to 120Hz refresh rate and display an image, frames are dropped making it all rather pointless.
- 32" 2560x1440 QHD / 50W Low power consumption.
- AH-VA Matte Panel / 30Hz Virtual 4K(3840x2160) support / LowBlueLight mode / Flicker Free(at brightness 35%~100%)
- Color reproduction range S-RGB 100%
- Overclockable (Customer's Graphic card must support overclocking)
- 5W+5W Built-in speaker / Space-efficiency using walls(200X100 VESA holes)
The spec also lists "virtual 4k" support, again a little pointless we thought in practice, a Low Blue Light mode (which didn't do anything on the QX2710) and a Flicker free backlight (which wasn't actually PWM-free on the QX2710!). There is a fully adjustable stand with tilt, height, swivel and rotate offered and it is also VESA compliant. There are integrated 2x 5W stereo speakers included and audio connections.
rflair
Moderator
Posts: 4556
Joined: 2004-11-20
Moderator
Posts: 4556
Joined: 2004-11-20
#4867051 Posted on: 07/07/2014 11:30 AM
Input lag is just to much on this monitor, 20ms+.
If they release a DVI-D only version that is capable of 100Hz+ I would consider one.
Input lag is just to much on this monitor, 20ms+.
If they release a DVI-D only version that is capable of 100Hz+ I would consider one.
Lane
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
#4867052 Posted on: 07/07/2014 11:32 AM
Looks nice, any reason it isn't 1600p though as opposed to 1440p?
16:9 instead of 16:10 dimensions.
Input lag is just to much on this monitor, 20ms+.
If they release a DVI-D only version that is capable of 100Hz+ I would consider one.
If exactly the same of the Benq one, yes ( 23ms, 5.4ms pixel response time + 17ms signal processing ).
But will need wait a test, because electronic should be quite different. ( maybe better, maybe not )
Looks nice, any reason it isn't 1600p though as opposed to 1440p?
16:9 instead of 16:10 dimensions.
Input lag is just to much on this monitor, 20ms+.
If they release a DVI-D only version that is capable of 100Hz+ I would consider one.
If exactly the same of the Benq one, yes ( 23ms, 5.4ms pixel response time + 17ms signal processing ).
But will need wait a test, because electronic should be quite different. ( maybe better, maybe not )
miffywiffy
Senior Member
Posts: 558
Joined: 2007-10-29
Senior Member
Posts: 558
Joined: 2007-10-29
#4867082 Posted on: 07/07/2014 12:41 PM
Why do people only focus on resolution?
All these monitors are such ****, colour reproduction is terrible and the uniformity of the panel is poor I bet.
I like the dell IPS panels, still got my 30inch one and it beats every one of these monitors by miles. Rather have 60hrz and an actual good picture than a 120hrz+ gimmick.
Why do people only focus on resolution?
All these monitors are such ****, colour reproduction is terrible and the uniformity of the panel is poor I bet.
I like the dell IPS panels, still got my 30inch one and it beats every one of these monitors by miles. Rather have 60hrz and an actual good picture than a 120hrz+ gimmick.
Lane
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
#4867091 Posted on: 07/07/2014 12:52 PM
Why do people only focus on resolution?
All these monitors are such ****, colour reproduction is terrible and the uniformity of the panel is poor I bet.
I like the dell IPS panels, still got my 30inch one and it beats every one of these monitors by miles. Rather have 60hrz and an actual good picture than a 120hrz+ gimmick.
Let say you get what you pay for the price, the panels are in general the same, but the color are not callibrated and checked are they should be. Then ofc, the stand, the cover of the monitor will be of less quality, or even electronic.
You can buy for way cheaper monitors who use the exact same panel of the Dell 30" ( the U3014 who is certainly one, if not the best monitor available yet ).. and you will end with a non calibrated monitor, no RGB mode, no 100% sRGB etc ...
Ofc, there's too the question on what the monitor is aimed ( and possibly for some feature what hardware you get ), some will put color accuracy over all, some will put the 120hz, some will put the input features etc.
Why do people only focus on resolution?
All these monitors are such ****, colour reproduction is terrible and the uniformity of the panel is poor I bet.
I like the dell IPS panels, still got my 30inch one and it beats every one of these monitors by miles. Rather have 60hrz and an actual good picture than a 120hrz+ gimmick.
Let say you get what you pay for the price, the panels are in general the same, but the color are not callibrated and checked are they should be. Then ofc, the stand, the cover of the monitor will be of less quality, or even electronic.
You can buy for way cheaper monitors who use the exact same panel of the Dell 30" ( the U3014 who is certainly one, if not the best monitor available yet ).. and you will end with a non calibrated monitor, no RGB mode, no 100% sRGB etc ...
Ofc, there's too the question on what the monitor is aimed ( and possibly for some feature what hardware you get ), some will put color accuracy over all, some will put the 120hz, some will put the input features etc.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3120
Joined: 2008-01-06
Looks nice, any reason it isn't 1600p though as opposed to 1440p?