Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
QNAP Launches QNA-UC5G1T USB 3.0 to 5GbE Adapter
QNAP launched the QNA-UC5G1T USB 3.0 to 5GbE adapter, allowing users to add 5GbE/2.5GbE/1GbE/100MbE connectivity to their computers and NAS via USB 3.0. Users can upgrade their network speed with the QNA-UC5G1T using an existing CAT 5e cable.
"Both home and business users require higher bandwidth to take advantage of high-performance systems and faster internet speeds. The handy QNA-UC5G1T adapter can be easily paired with QNAP's 10GbE switch to create a high-speed network environment at home or in the office to greatly improve network speed and application performance," said Jason Hsu, Product Manager of QNAP, adding "the QNA-UC5G1T is also useful for adding Ethernet connectivity to modern laptops that lack in-built network ports."The QNA-UC5G1T can be connected to other devices using a USB Type-A or Type-C cable. It is palm-sized and passively cooled for easy and prolonged use.
- Windows 10, 8.1, 8, 7 requires a driver.
- Current versions of macOS do not support the QNA-UC5G1T. Click here to manually install the Aquantia AQC11U driver.
- Linux: Supports Linux core 3.10, 3.12, 3.2, 4.2, and 4.4. Requires the Aquantia AQC11U driver.
- QNAP NAS: QTS 4.3.6 (or later) is required.
Key specifications
- Controller: AQuantia AQC111U
- I/O: 1 x USB 3.0 Type-C; 1 x 5GbE/NBASE-T port
- 0.2M USB 3.0 Type-C to Type-A cable
Availability
The QNA-UC5G1T USB 3.0 to 5GbE adapter is now available.
QNAP Launches TS-332X 3-bay 10GbE NAS with 10GbE - 09/04/2018 08:44 AM
QNAP released a new quad-core 3-bay NAS - the TS-332X - that allows for building a RAID 5 array for balancing capacity and protection with the fewest disks. ...
QNAP Launches QWA-AC2600 Wireless Adapter for NAS - 05/25/2018 07:39 AM
QNAP released the new QWA-AC2600 wireless adapter that can provide increased flexibility in NAS deployment and potential NAS applications. The QWA-AC2600 is a 2.4/5 GHz dual band dual concurrent (DBDC...
QNAP launches QM2 (Quad M2) PCIe Cards to Enhance NAS Performance - 05/22/2018 05:38 PM
QNAP extended the lineup of QM2 PCIe expansion cards with new models that support up to four M.2 SSDs slots on a single card. QM2 cards support either M.2 SATA SSDs or M.2 PCIe NVMe SSDs to enable SSD...
QNAP launches new TS-832X NAS family with 2 10GbE SFP + ports - 05/16/2018 08:22 AM
QNAP released the new TS-832X 8-bay quad-core NAS with two built-in 10GbE SFP ports, providing users with a budget-friendly, high-speed network storage solution. It is also an ARM-based NAS that suppo...
QNAP Launches TVS-882BR Blu-ray NAS Series - 06/08/2017 12:48 PM
QNAP launched the TVS-882BR Blu-ray NAS series (TVS-882BR and TVS-882BRT3 models). The TVS-882BRT3 also features four Thunderbolt 3 ports....
TheBigSmooth
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2019-04-03
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2019-04-03
#5671934 Posted on: 05/22/2019 05:26 PM
No, it shouldnt. USB uses the CPU so that should be the only hit but there should be no difference in noticeable performance. I just hate that companies arent going all in for 10GbE I wont upgrade my router or anything till everything is 10GbE. ive had 1GbE since 2005....
Does USB ethernet adapters have a lag comparing to standard Ethernet connection?
No, it shouldnt. USB uses the CPU so that should be the only hit but there should be no difference in noticeable performance. I just hate that companies arent going all in for 10GbE I wont upgrade my router or anything till everything is 10GbE. ive had 1GbE since 2005....
sverek
Junior Member
Posts: 6073
Joined: 2011-01-02
Junior Member
Posts: 6073
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5672117 Posted on: 05/23/2019 02:06 AM
Thanks.
Are you missing something by not going up to 10GbE? I have 100mbit connection (provider and lan) and never thought I'd need more speed. Just letting heavy data download overnight.
No, it shouldnt. USB uses the CPU so that should be the only hit but there should be no difference in noticeable performance. I just hate that companies arent going all in for 10GbE I wont upgrade my router or anything till everything is 10GbE. ive had 1GbE since 2005....
Thanks.
Are you missing something by not going up to 10GbE? I have 100mbit connection (provider and lan) and never thought I'd need more speed. Just letting heavy data download overnight.
holystarlight
Senior Member
Posts: 791
Joined: 2007-10-14
Senior Member
Posts: 791
Joined: 2007-10-14
#5672408 Posted on: 05/23/2019 07:42 PM
well they cant over USB 3.0, the requirements for full 10GB nic is at least Thunderbolt 2, and Network cards for PCs are cheap but decent 10GB switches are still pricey for it to be mainstream.
No, it shouldnt. USB uses the CPU so that should be the only hit but there should be no difference in noticeable performance. I just hate that companies arent going all in for 10GbE I wont upgrade my router or anything till everything is 10GbE. ive had 1GbE since 2005....
well they cant over USB 3.0, the requirements for full 10GB nic is at least Thunderbolt 2, and Network cards for PCs are cheap but decent 10GB switches are still pricey for it to be mainstream.
StevieSleep
Member
Posts: 34
Joined: 2018-10-02
Member
Posts: 34
Joined: 2018-10-02
#5672554 Posted on: 05/24/2019 06:03 AM
Having had my fair share of laggy USB peripherals I sincerely doubt your assessment is correct. I don't know enough about the subject, but having had pricey accessories that would show input lag of over 200ms your "NO" should come with some caveats.
On a separate note, why go 10GbE? Besides the fact that you can get it now if you're willing to pay for it. It's not worth it for the average consumer.
10GbE would easily overwhelm a SATA SSD, so without NVME or RAID everywhere it would be pointless for storage transfer.
Considering the price decrease for RAM, you could use apps that keep all they crap in memory, but apart from a smaller delay when doing extremely heavy loads you wouldn't notice anything.
From what I know, the only thing the "average" person might be doing that would benefit from 10G is high res video editing, but that's already stretching the definition of "average" to the breaking point.
No, it shouldnt. USB uses the CPU so that should be the only hit but there should be no difference in noticeable performance. I just hate that companies arent going all in for 10GbE I wont upgrade my router or anything till everything is 10GbE. ive had 1GbE since 2005....
Having had my fair share of laggy USB peripherals I sincerely doubt your assessment is correct. I don't know enough about the subject, but having had pricey accessories that would show input lag of over 200ms your "NO" should come with some caveats.
On a separate note, why go 10GbE? Besides the fact that you can get it now if you're willing to pay for it. It's not worth it for the average consumer.
10GbE would easily overwhelm a SATA SSD, so without NVME or RAID everywhere it would be pointless for storage transfer.
Considering the price decrease for RAM, you could use apps that keep all they crap in memory, but apart from a smaller delay when doing extremely heavy loads you wouldn't notice anything.
From what I know, the only thing the "average" person might be doing that would benefit from 10G is high res video editing, but that's already stretching the definition of "average" to the breaking point.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 6073
Joined: 2011-01-02
Does USB ethernet adapters have a lag comparing to standard Ethernet connection?