QLC Memory with SLC Performance: A New NAND Technology Is In the Works
SSDs with quad-level cell NAND memory are slowly getting accepted, however, there are certain disadvantages to using them. In addition to the reduced lifespan, the write speed is slower a certain extent as well.
Neo Semiconductor, claims to have developed a technology that will allow NAND memory with four bits per cell to operate at the same speeds as single-level cell ICs. The company claims in a white paper that it can attain the speeds of slc-nand at the same chip costs as qlc memory while maintaining the same size of the chip. When compared to mlc (two bits per cell), the data density per package is equivalent, albeit the researchers do not specifically specify how many bits per cell are stored.
"Technological leaps have a history of driving innovation, so the expectations for NAND flash memory becoming faster by more than one order of magnitude are high," said Andy Hsu, founder and CEO at Neo Semiconductor Inc. "Imagine the possibilities when X-NAND QLC flash memory offers higher bandwidth than conventional SLC flash memory."
Its X-NAND design divides 3D flash memory into 16-64 planes rather than the usual 4. With no increase in production costs. Sequential read and write rates may rise by a factor of 27 times and 15 times, respectively, as compared to the current state of the technology. A smaller chip surface area and lower power consumption are both required at the same time (to achieve the same capacity). Furthermore, the production costs should be at or below the level of those for qlc memory. It is not yet known how well the concept would perform in more demanding and longer-lasting jobs, but TLC and QLC chips, according to the developers, would profit from the approach.
In our believe key to this all would be endurance. Higher transfer rates in situations that benefit from them may result in more wear, which may result in lower reliability. The company says it is currently in discussions with NAND manufacturers about potential partnership opportunities and that it already has 22 patents in-house.
Senior Member
Posts: 1955
Joined: 2005-08-05
It's not due to a brand, entreprise or not, but to the type of NAND used SLC, MLC, TLC or QLC (from fast/reliable/small volume/expensive to the oposite).
For entreprise you use SLC or MLC, for home all other...
On top of that some company consider that TLC and QLC are MLC (as the M mean Multiple, T triple and Q quad) it's half lie... but still a lie as for a pro use you will found their limit earlier than a real MLC(exemple: latest Samsung Pro)
For home use TLC is fine, but i think QLC is flirting too much with the limit (already destroyed some in heavy use)...
The good point of QLC is that they make price go down, and made realistic to move from a HDD 4to to SSD 4to for (relatively of course) not too much...
People that need mlc or the write performance, know what they need to buy. People that don't need it, are maybe more stupid and buy ssd's because of the high sequential read on the package....
Senior Member
Posts: 1469
Joined: 2017-02-14
@Hilbert Hagedoorn
"In our believe key to this all would be endurance."
Well if they don't need it they may not be very informed but buying on price isn't stupid. Sometimes being uninformed works out just fine.
Senior Member
Posts: 1787
Joined: 2013-06-04
The trade-off from TLC to QLC is too big to use in daily application, but perfectly reasonable for backup storage.
For everyday usage you want something that can last at least until you need more space or can upgrade for more speed.
Storage doesn't need as much write cycles, as most of the time it will be siting quiet.