AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT review
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT review
Crucial P2 500 GB NVMe M2 SSD review
ASUS STRIX B550-I Gaming review
Kioxia Exceria 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD review
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - June 2020
ASUS ROG Strix Z490-E Gaming review
MSI MEG Z490 Godlike review
Preview: AMD VEGA GPU Architecture
It is time to talk through a few mysteries from the AMD VEGA graphics processor architecture, join us in a preview architecture breakdown of what is to be expected with AMD VEGA graphics processors.
Read the editorial right here.
Preview: Desktop Kaby Lake Core i5 7600K CPU - 12/17/2016 12:31 PM
We look at the Intel Core i5 7600K processor, a respin from Intel based on the 14nm node; these processors are more energy friendly. For this review we look at the performance of this processor in a w...
Preview: AMD Radeon R9 NANO - 08/27/2015 01:56 PM
At the launch of the Radeon R9 Fury and Fury X AMD also announced something that caught the interest of many, a small form factor yet high-end graphics card aimed at powerful small game and HTPCs, yes...
Alex13
Senior Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: 2003-12-15
Senior Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: 2003-12-15
#5378485 Posted on: 01/05/2017 06:03 PM
I hope you're wrong for the simple reason that one company dominating leads to anti consumer practices. Lack of competition has led to nvidia managing to turn the 300$ mid size chip to a 600-700$ "high end" product, and intel spends a decade selling quad cores as high end CPU's with minor improvements and no real progress being made (especially single thread performance) (and inflating prices nvidia style, tho less aggressively - relatively speaking). We need a good AMD on both GPU/CPU fronts, even if they dont manage to get the top ultimate enthusiast tier performance product out there, as long as they become relevant again and keep those 2 (interl/nvidia) honest from now on.
I think it is safe to say no matter what AMD comes up with Nvidia will have something better.
I hope you're wrong for the simple reason that one company dominating leads to anti consumer practices. Lack of competition has led to nvidia managing to turn the 300$ mid size chip to a 600-700$ "high end" product, and intel spends a decade selling quad cores as high end CPU's with minor improvements and no real progress being made (especially single thread performance) (and inflating prices nvidia style, tho less aggressively - relatively speaking). We need a good AMD on both GPU/CPU fronts, even if they dont manage to get the top ultimate enthusiast tier performance product out there, as long as they become relevant again and keep those 2 (interl/nvidia) honest from now on.
Mannerheim
Senior Member
Posts: 4794
Joined: 2004-01-24
Senior Member
Posts: 4794
Joined: 2004-01-24
#5378489 Posted on: 01/05/2017 06:08 PM
What is even more sad is by the time high-end VEGA is released the Titan X would have been out for over a year and AMD still probably will not be able to compete !
I can't see how they could ever catch-up at this point.
only 0.00001% of people has afford to buy titan X. So its a fail in that.
What is even more sad is by the time high-end VEGA is released the Titan X would have been out for over a year and AMD still probably will not be able to compete !
I can't see how they could ever catch-up at this point.
only 0.00001% of people has afford to buy titan X. So its a fail in that.
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 2810
Joined: 2008-10-13
Senior Member
Posts: 2810
Joined: 2008-10-13
#5378496 Posted on: 01/05/2017 06:22 PM
People said that when the Original Titan launched, GTX 780 as well.
Then 290x dropped. And lets not act like the Fury X didnt stay within reach of the 980ti and even beat Titan X at higher resolutions or non nvidia games at times before Vram limitations.
Besides these are non even finished retail samples and you are saying AMD is already dead.
I think it is safe to say no matter what AMD comes up with Nvidia will have something better.
People said that when the Original Titan launched, GTX 780 as well.
Then 290x dropped. And lets not act like the Fury X didnt stay within reach of the 980ti and even beat Titan X at higher resolutions or non nvidia games at times before Vram limitations.
Besides these are non even finished retail samples and you are saying AMD is already dead.
haste
Senior Member
Posts: 976
Joined: 2006-09-30
Senior Member
Posts: 976
Joined: 2006-09-30
#5378501 Posted on: 01/05/2017 06:28 PM
Well I'm kinda puzzled now. Is that really all? They didn't even show the card? Just GPU with HBMs? For me this is even bigger disappointment than the NVIDIA Keynote.
I guess everybody understands what this means. AMD is now whole year behind NVIDIA in enthusiast segment.
Also... If those sealed PCs were running this 500mm2 GPU, with performance very similar to GTX1080, that would be really sad.
Well I'm kinda puzzled now. Is that really all? They didn't even show the card? Just GPU with HBMs? For me this is even bigger disappointment than the NVIDIA Keynote.
I guess everybody understands what this means. AMD is now whole year behind NVIDIA in enthusiast segment.
Also... If those sealed PCs were running this 500mm2 GPU, with performance very similar to GTX1080, that would be really sad.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: 2013-11-09
I think it is safe to say no matter what AMD comes up with Nvidia will have something better.