Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Fractal Design Focus 2 chassis review
Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.27.168
Download Intel network driver package 27.6
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.8.1 driver download
Prime95 download version 30.8 build 16
Memtest86 9.5 download
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1743
GeForce 516.94 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.4
FurMark Download v1.31
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.3222


New Forum Topics
ASUS Recalls 10,000 ROG Maximus Z690 Hero Motherboards Due to Potential Fire Hazard Display Driver Uninstaller Thread NZXT N7 Z690, a beautiful motherboard with full cover AMD Ryzen 7950X, 7900X, 7700X and 7600X Zen4 processors pricing at Canada etailer Review: F1 2022: PC graphics performance analysis Windows power plan settings explorer utility Fine Utilise Power of RadeonPRO Software & SweetFX Part 2 Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. AMD's Possible Delay Ryzen 7000 to September 27th might be BIOS related In 2024, 1TB DDR5 RAM will be available, followed by DDR5-7200 RAM in 2025 says Samsung




Guru3D.com » News » Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online

Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 01/14/2013 11:07 AM | source: | 30 comment(s)
Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online

A couple of photo's and specification details have surfaced on the web with the topic, Samsung Galaxy S IV, yes Sir. The parts and specs explained are preliminary but Samsung seems to be pursuing the Big.LITTLE route. A photo surfaced showing more info alright. Behind closed doors at CES Samsung has been showing the 5" AMOLED screen based phone that handles a resolution of 1920x1080 pixels. The new generation screens should be more energy efficient. The Exynos 5 Octa SoC is likely to be used with the Galaxy S IV, that is an octa-core processor.

Apparently the Exynos 5 Octa does not have an embedded MALI chip for graphics anymore, yet the has bee swapped out for a graphics processor from the PowerVR line of products. Likely the PowerVR SGX544MP3 with it's GPU cores clocked at 533MHz.

Anyway, have a look at the photo's of some leaked slides courtesy of Anand and Beyond3D:



Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online




« Enermax Fulmo GT HTPX chassis tested and reviewed · Preliminary Specs Samsung Galaxy S IV online · Apple Drops to 11-Month Low on Reports of IPhone Cutbacks »

6 pages 1 2 3 4 5 6


CronoGraal
Senior Member



Posts: 4194
Joined: 2006-10-11

#4500440 Posted on: 01/14/2013 05:58 PM
1080p on 5"? Overkiiiiiillll. I'm fine with 720p on screens up to 7" considering what standards are these days. A few years from now maybe 1080p would make more sense on a 5" screen, but not at the moment.


Right? I don't understand the craze for insane resolutions. Yeah images designed for that resolution will look really nice, and yeah that's a pretty good DPI, but it's pointless if graphics have to be upscaled to fit as opposed to designed for that size to begin with.

k1net1cs
Senior Member



Posts: 3783
Joined: 2010-11-14

#4500446 Posted on: 01/14/2013 06:05 PM
pfff.and plastic body?

Yeah.
Nokia 3310 wants to have a go at any iPhones. 2 out of 3.

nick0323
Senior Member



Posts: 1011
Joined: 2010-02-24

#4500454 Posted on: 01/14/2013 06:17 PM
Amazing how Samsung have cheap plastic cases whilst HTC have decent cases yet Samsung sell more...oh wait money in marketing and 90% noobs.

Ryu5uzaku
Senior Member



Posts: 7214
Joined: 2006-09-24

#4500456 Posted on: 01/14/2013 06:18 PM
pfff.and plastic body?


plastic body is just fine :o np

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 13806
Joined: 2004-05-16

#4500473 Posted on: 01/14/2013 06:38 PM
Mostly because I'm afraid they'll do a ****ty job as it stands. I'm afraid the processing power they pack in won't be remotely close to enough to support squat at that resolution. Games at 720p look and run like crap on phones right now for that reason. As far as videos go, most the content available is unfortunately still 720p, that's not going to change anytime soon regardless of what resolution phones are. Also, mobile websites are going to have to update to be prepared for 1080p handhelds, otherwise nothing will look right by default.


Right? I don't understand the craze for insane resolutions. Yeah images designed for that resolution will look really nice, and yeah that's a pretty good DPI, but it's pointless if graphics have to be upscaled to fit as opposed to designed for that size to begin with.


Content scaling is definitely a problem at the moment but it won't get resolved unless the hardware is there. No one is going to develop high resolution icons if there is nothing for it to work on. It's actually something that Apple has a huge leg up on as they've been preparing for this switch for sometime.

The reason I like this new craze of resolutions is because beforehand displays especially in mobile parts where something that most OEMs looked for in price savings. Look at any laptop sold from 2006-2012 and the displays are a joke, some of them don't even support 720p all the way to 15 inches. It's laughable at best. Now that Apple went "OH HERE BAM" and has the marketing behind it to let people know it's worth buying, other companies are forced to compete and make higher quality displays.

Now as far as DPI goes, were pretty much at the point of diminishing returns and the display manufacturers will have to focus elsewhere - at least I hope they will. Although they probably won't, seeing as only Apple seems to care about display calibration/contrast/etc in consumer level products.

As far as performance goes at these resolutions, it's not even really a problem. The processor in the Nexus 10 (Mali-T604) can outperform pretty much every tablet out at a significantly higher resolution. Apple found ways to increase performance even over that.

So yeah, I'd rather them hit limits now and force content to adjust quickly then take their time over a few years slowly building higher res devices.

Amazing how Samsung have cheap plastic cases whilst HTC have decent cases yet Samsung sell more...oh wait money in marketing and 90% noobs.


I'd rather have plastic. My sisters aluminum iPad has a huge dent in it after a single fall. My Nexus 7 has nothing. In fact my Galaxy Nexus which I've had since launch and has taken a few falls only has a couple scuffs. Plus plastic is lighter and doesn't need to be designed around.

Oh and yeah I'm pretty confident that the majority of people don't buy a phone because of it's body.

6 pages 1 2 3 4 5 6


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022