Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Hitman III: PC graphics perf benchmark review
TeamGroup CX2 1TB SATA3 SSD review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Corsair HS70 Bluetooth Headset Review

New Downloads
HWiNFO Download v6.42
Prime95 download version 30.4 build 8
CrystalDiskInfo 8.10.0 Download
SiSoft Sandra 20/20 download v30.92
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.1.1 driver download
CPU-Z download v1.95
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9168
GeForce 461.33 hotfix driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5620 beta
3DMark Download v2.16.7117 + Time Spy


New Forum Topics
Cougar launches AURIC, Semi-fanless GOLD power supply with aRGB RTSS 6.7.0 beta 1 ASRock Releases 1-liter Jupiter X300 Mini PC Weird 5700 XT problem ¿how to force windows restart when gpu_use is in idle or...? Meet the Cooler Master MasterCase 700 GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Hall Of Fame (HOF) PCB photos GeForce Hotfix Driver Version 461.33 SilverStone NJ700 power supply unit with a capacity of 700W is fanless Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.1.1 Download & Discussion




Guru3D.com » News » Possible Radeon RX Vega 3DMark Time Spy Benchmark Result

Possible Radeon RX Vega 3DMark Time Spy Benchmark Result

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 04/30/2017 03:51 PM | source: | 96 comment(s)
Possible Radeon RX Vega 3DMark Time Spy Benchmark Result

In our forums there have been posted some links towards a 3DMark TimeSpy results. Looking at the result set, that actually might be Radeon RX Vega. The result shows the card that is running Time Spy with with a score of 5950 points and a graphics score of 5721 points.

It might be Radeon RX Vega as the graphics card info in the result set shows a few familiar things. It is an undetected AMD card, is has 8GB of graphics memory and the strongest indicator of it all, the memory runs 700 MHz. In case you don’t remember, HBM memory on the Radeon R9 Fury ran at 500 MHz. With Vega having HBM2, that 700 MHz is very plausible.

The driver result set is a 22.19.384.20. The driver states, not FM approved e.g. it is a beta driver.
The score seems a bit low, the card runs 1200 MHz. If it is an engineering board we assume the clocks on the final products would be much higher. The card is tested on a X370 system with Ryzen 7 1800X processor. Perhaps we are assuming a little more than is possible and it is a Firepro card.
 

If you compare a little back and forth (Ryzen 7 1800X and out test platform only differ a few hundred points in Time Spy), you can assume a card in the GeForce GXT 1070 and when faster clocked 1080 performance bracket) at 5950 points. If you focus solely in the GPU score then 5721 points is spot on a GeForce GTX 1070.

Plese keep in mind, AMD might releasing several products based off Vega, e.g. something again a 1070, something against a 1080 and who knows something that climbs up towards the 1080 Ti. Let's hope so.

The score can be found publicly on 3DMark:
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1544741

Let’s take this entry with a huge grain of salt, and take all the right disclaimers for granted okay? 

Update, thanks to the sharp eyes of GeniusPr0 who spotted that the Devier Hardware ID for the entry is 687F:C1, and that leads to a story we covered back in December.
 

 
We also noticed that ID for a Doom Vulkan result set that was posted from an AMD event (check photo above) So yes, chances are getting much higher that this is the real thing. You can retrieve the Hardware_ID info once you place the result set into a comparison. You then will also notice that this result  set was a fresh one, created on the 12th of April.
 



Possible Radeon RX Vega 3DMark Time Spy Benchmark Result Possible Radeon RX Vega 3DMark Time Spy Benchmark Result Possible Radeon RX Vega 3DMark Time Spy Benchmark Result




« Star Citizen Reaches A Staggering $148 Million in Crowdfunding · Possible Radeon RX Vega 3DMark Time Spy Benchmark Result · EK releasing new monoblock for the ASUS ROG Strix Z270I Gaming »

Related Stories

Wanna Flash your Radeon RX 470 towards a 570? It’s possible. 480 towards 580 as well. - 04/19/2017 03:37 PM
So yesterday after posting our RX 570 and 580 reviews some questions have risen on the fact if the the 470/480 and be flashed towards the 570/580. This seems to be a correct assumption....

Six Core AMD Ryzen Processors Might Still Possible - 02/02/2017 09:02 AM
So we have posted a thing or two already about Ryzen being released as 4 and 8 core processors. AMD will release an 4 and 8-core model with and without hyper-threading. ...

New Screenshot Show Possible Windows 10 for Phones - 04/27/2015 04:12 PM
A new screen-shots of the new Samsung Ativ S with Windows Mobile build 10070 shows possible changes to the live tiles on the start-screen. The tiles design and layout appear to be very close to each o...

Possible GeForce GTX 870 specs and benchmark leaked - 08/11/2014 11:35 PM
Over at an Asian website specs leaked of what could be the pending GeForce GTX 870. A user from the forum website Coolaler posted aa GPU-Z screenshot detailing what seems to be the GeForce GTX 870....

Is it possible for the NSA to Spy through the Xbox Kinect ? - 07/17/2013 08:10 AM
Okay here's a new theory. Would it be possible for the NSA to Spy through the Xbox Kinect ? So not unlike Kinect, Skype had assured its users that "wiretaps were technically impossible" ...


20 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


ivymike10mt
Senior Member



Posts: 228
Joined: 2015-01-28

#5426411 Posted on: 04/30/2017 04:19 PM
It's looks like rebranded Fury X, rather than just a new 2017 Vega product.
I don't belive that will look their flagship product in 2017.

GeniusPr0
Senior Member



Posts: 1252
Joined: 2003-04-26

#5426414 Posted on: 04/30/2017 04:23 PM
Hi Hilbert,

Doing a score compare reveals a driver name of 687F:C1

PrMinisterGR
Senior Member



Posts: 7467
Joined: 2014-09-27

#5426415 Posted on: 04/30/2017 04:28 PM
What's interesting is that the reported driver version is the OpenCL one (22.19.384.20), instead of the D3D one.




The clock could also just be a part of extrapolating performance, a leak to measure reactions, or a ton of other things. I personally don't believe that any Vega part that goes versus the Ti/XP, will have anything less than 1.5GHz. They were promising passively cooled server parts at 1.5GHz, so...

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 40036
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5426417 Posted on: 04/30/2017 04:30 PM
Hi Hilbert,

Doing a score compare reveals a driver name of 687F:C1

That's a good spot, and the ID matches the presumed AOTS Vega leak back in December.

Anarion
Senior Member



Posts: 13692
Joined: 2005-08-13

#5426420 Posted on: 04/30/2017 04:37 PM
This could just be the cut down Vega that's supposed to compete with the 1070. Or it could be full Vega clocked lower.

People need to stop forming conclusions on these leaks. They're almost never accurate.
That would be disappointing if they need one extra year and HBM 2.0 to match GTX 1070. That would mean no competition again when NVIDIA launches Volta.

If it's noticeably cheaper and uses less power... Then it could be nice.

20 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021