Beelink SER6 (Ryzen 9 6800H) mini PC review
Be Quiet! Pure Power 12 M - 850W ATX 3.0 PSU review
Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
PC version Star Wars: Battlefront needs at least 8GB system RAM
EA has shared the PC system requirements for Star Wars: Battlefront. According to them your PC will at the very least need a Core i3 processor, 8GB RAM system memory and a GeForce GTX 660 or Radeon HD 7850 or better graphics card.
EA actually recommend processors in the Skylake series (for unknown reasons), according to the list you'd need at least a Core i3-6300T while the Core i5 6600 is recommended. 8GB RAM is required, recommended is 16 GB.
| Requirements | Minimum | Recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core i3-6300T or equivalent | Intel Core i5-6600 or equivalent |
| RAM Memory | 8GB | 16GB |
| GPU (Nvidia) | GeForce GTX 660 2GB | GeForce GTX 970 4GB |
| GPU (AMD) | HD 7850 2GB | Radeon R9 290 4GB |
| Storage | At least 40GB | At least 40GB |
| Operating System | Windows 7 or later | Windows 10 |
Star Wars Battlefront is an upcoming action video game based on the Star Wars franchise. The third major release in the Star Wars: Battlefront series, it is being developed by EA DICE and will be published by Electronic Arts. It is scheduled for release on November 17, 2015 in North America and Brazil, November 19, 2015 in Australia and November 20, 2015 in Europe for Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 4, and Xbox One.
PC version of 'Grand Theft Auto V' rumored for March release - 01/10/2014 10:16 AM
Executive Brazilian retailer, Nuveem stated that 'Grand Theft Auto V' is expected to be released for the PC on March 12. In an interview with Codigo Fonte; Thiago Diniz, director of digital distribu...
PC version of Assassins Creed 3 should be just fine - 11/14/2012 11:11 AM
In a Reddit IAMA discussion, Ubisoft's employees have revealed some interesting new information about the PC version of Assassin's Creed 3. According to Gabe Graziani, Ubisoft's Community Developer...
Crysis 3 PC version will get extra visuals - 05/09/2012 10:40 AM
In a recent interview to Spong, Crytek's Rasmus Hojengaard stated that Crysis 3 PC version will get some extra Visual Goodies when it arrives next year. SPOnG: Were PC players concerned with the move...
Alan Wake PC version Launch Trailer - 02/15/2012 01:52 PM
Alan Wake for PC will launch on Feb 16, and Remedy has already confirmed that PC port will include better graphics, proper controls. Alan Wake boxed version will launch on March 2. ...
How Crytek doomed Crysis 2's PC version - 03/24/2011 12:13 PM
DarReviews has published an interesting article called 'How Crytek doomed Crysis 2's PC version'. Here's an excerpt: For starters, the game doesn't support DX11. Although Crytek stated that they will...
xeph
Senior Member
Posts: 370
Joined: 2015-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 370
Joined: 2015-08-03
#5168914 Posted on: 10/06/2015 08:29 PM
i somehow think that ill be fine with just my 8gb
i somehow think that ill be fine with just my 8gb
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8372
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8372
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5168916 Posted on: 10/06/2015 08:37 PM
lol @ people surprised that requirements go up. "OMG OMG OMG, you mean...as time goes on...i need to upgrade my PC?!!! BLASPHEMY! BURN THEM AT THE STAKE!!!"
lol @ people surprised that requirements go up. "OMG OMG OMG, you mean...as time goes on...i need to upgrade my PC?!!! BLASPHEMY! BURN THEM AT THE STAKE!!!"
DeskStar
Senior Member
Posts: 1307
Joined: 2011-01-11
Senior Member
Posts: 1307
Joined: 2011-01-11
#5168917 Posted on: 10/06/2015 08:39 PM
Damn.
Good thing ram is on the cheap side right now.
Has been for quite a few years. I guess it just depended on how much of how fast you wanted spend the extra dollars on.
I have been prepared for some time now for games to start using up more and more RAM. I always use up more than 10-12gb when gaming and usually a mecca, metric, crap ton if I have DSR on forcing 4-8k in games/benchies. I have simply destroyed the 6,144mb of RAM on my GPU's that is for sure.
Here's looking to DX12 and its' ability to properly allocate resources and exploit hardware closer to the metal.......
Damn.
Good thing ram is on the cheap side right now.
Has been for quite a few years. I guess it just depended on how much of how fast you wanted spend the extra dollars on.
I have been prepared for some time now for games to start using up more and more RAM. I always use up more than 10-12gb when gaming and usually a mecca, metric, crap ton if I have DSR on forcing 4-8k in games/benchies. I have simply destroyed the 6,144mb of RAM on my GPU's that is for sure.
Here's looking to DX12 and its' ability to properly allocate resources and exploit hardware closer to the metal.......
Megabiv
Senior Member
Posts: 798
Joined: 2006-09-14
Senior Member
Posts: 798
Joined: 2006-09-14
#5168931 Posted on: 10/06/2015 08:57 PM
Aye, for those with older systems yeah sure but I wouldn't build a system for anyone these days without at least 8GB since it's a nice boost above the 4GB threshold (in case of using any ram hungry programs) and it's stupidly cheap (by PC component standards) that it's like a no brainer.
I've always had the mentality of RAM that I'd prefer to have more and need less than have less and need more. This rang true the most when i had my Q6600 setup with 4GB of RAM which was great for XP but started to die a death in Vista x64 and when I looked to upgrade to 8GB DDR2 the prices had sky rocketed almost higher than DDR3 equivalents. Wish I'd just gone for 8GB right at the start.
It's a non issue anyway, if you can only afford 4GB RAM, you aren't building a gaming PC in the first place
Aye, for those with older systems yeah sure but I wouldn't build a system for anyone these days without at least 8GB since it's a nice boost above the 4GB threshold (in case of using any ram hungry programs) and it's stupidly cheap (by PC component standards) that it's like a no brainer.
I've always had the mentality of RAM that I'd prefer to have more and need less than have less and need more. This rang true the most when i had my Q6600 setup with 4GB of RAM which was great for XP but started to die a death in Vista x64 and when I looked to upgrade to 8GB DDR2 the prices had sky rocketed almost higher than DDR3 equivalents. Wish I'd just gone for 8GB right at the start.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 205
Joined: 2011-12-13
Ahhh, then a 8 core, 32gb, 4 card system should suffice.... Patiently waits for Beta...