Patriot Viper V765 Keyboard Review
Combo deal: Office 2016 Pro and W10 for $34
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: RTX and DLSS Update
ASUS RT-AX88U (AX6000) router review
The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
URCDkey Spring Sale(up to 86% off) Windows 10 Pro $11
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming X review
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 VENTUS XS 6G OC review
Palit GeForce GTX 1660 StormX OC review
Corsair Crystal 680X PC Chassis Review
Nvidia Turing: Mobile RTX graphics chips 2050/2060/2070 announced during CES
Over at the pending CES in Las Vegas Nvidia might be introducing first mobile offspring based on the Turing graphics architecture. If correct then the first Turing notebooks could already be available in about two months.
Nvidia would plan to launch the first laptop with a Turing graphics unit but with availability in February. Initially, there would be two revisions, GeForce RTX 2070 as a temporary mobile flagship and then a lower clocked Max-Q variant. As Max-Q, Nvidia refers to graphics cards with lower power consumption and lower power, but in notebooks allow a more compact cooling and flatter design.
GeForce 2060, 2050 Ti and 2050 are also mentioned, the prefix (GTX/RTX) remains unclear. For while the 2070 versions of the RTX-exclusive features raytracing and DLSS support, the smaller chips could not have dedicated RT and tensor cores.
A possible RTX 2060 also surfaced in a benchmark. The graphics cards of the new series appear in benchmarks and databases, all models are listed , in addition also supplemented by smaller variants. These are in the RTX 2060 in the normal and Max-Q variant. With over 19,000 points in 3DMark, the RTX 2060 is expected to rank between GTX 1070 and 1070 Max-Q.
NVIDIA to release GTX 1060 SKU with faster GDDR5X Graphics Memory - 10/19/2018 07:18 PM
It is with certainty that we can say that AMD will release a 12nm fabbed version of Polaris, likely called Radeon RX 590. With that knowledge in mind NVIDIA will be releasing a refresh GeForce GTX 106...
Review: Nvidia Turing architecture - GeForce RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti - 09/14/2018 02:00 PM
As time closes in on the actual performance reviews, today we'll be taking an architectural deep dive into the Turing graphics processors, and of course, we can share with you all specifications, y...
Nvidia Talks About Higher OC clocks on the Founder 2080 cards - also PCB Photo - 08/21/2018 04:39 PM
NVIDIA just posted a blog post, and it is a rather unusual one. In the blog post, they pretty much state that they've always had an issue with the founders' edition cards, to reach higher boost cloc...
NVIDIA Teases Heavily in Riddle Video - Deciphered - it is GeForce GTX 2080 - 08/14/2018 07:39 AM
NVIDIA has released a new video, a bit of a teaser called be for the game. If you look deeper and closer at the video it is FILLED with hints, and unofficially, it reveals the name of the to be releas...
NVIDIA Tweet Indicates New Volume Stock availability for GeForce graphics cards - 05/10/2018 12:19 PM
One more news-item from the NVIDIA front, the Nvidia team on twitter posted a tweet that suggests there is a large amount of graphics cards (stock) inbound. Which is good news, as prices should come ...
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 8453
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 8453
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5615657 Posted on: 12/10/2018 12:15 PM
RTX 2050? Why would they put tensor and RT cores on a budget card like that? I guess it will most likely be a GTX card.
RTX 2050? Why would they put tensor and RT cores on a budget card like that? I guess it will most likely be a GTX card.
Corrupt^
Senior Member
Posts: 6861
Joined: 2005-12-02
Senior Member
Posts: 6861
Joined: 2005-12-02
#5615658 Posted on: 12/10/2018 12:17 PM
Oh neat, € 4000 laptops...
Oh neat, € 4000 laptops...
sammarbella
Senior Member
Posts: 3928
Joined: 2014-12-09
Senior Member
Posts: 3928
Joined: 2014-12-09
#5615692 Posted on: 12/10/2018 01:21 PM
I bet they will cost less than 15'' Apple MacBook Pro with Radeon Pro Vega 16 upgrade (3050 US$) or Radeon Pro Vega 20 (3150 US$) and will perform better for gaming.
Oh neat, € 4000 laptops...
I bet they will cost less than 15'' Apple MacBook Pro with Radeon Pro Vega 16 upgrade (3050 US$) or Radeon Pro Vega 20 (3150 US$) and will perform better for gaming.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 3723
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 3723
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5615761 Posted on: 12/10/2018 03:05 PM
I thought the 2070 was supposed to be the lowest-end raytracing-capable GPU? If so, I think having the RTX 2060 is a bit confusing/misleading. As far as I'm concerned, non-RT GPUs should stick with GT(X).
I thought the 2070 was supposed to be the lowest-end raytracing-capable GPU? If so, I think having the RTX 2060 is a bit confusing/misleading. As far as I'm concerned, non-RT GPUs should stick with GT(X).
tunejunky
Senior Member
Posts: 800
Joined: 2017-08-18
Senior Member
Posts: 800
Joined: 2017-08-18
#5615806 Posted on: 12/10/2018 04:09 PM
but there's more...
as i teased last week Re: Alienware's upcoming "M" series, ability to change/upgrade full, fat Turing, or go Max-Q with enhanced cooling (also an option).
but yeah vendors are excited to have current cpu/gpu combos for sale again. 10xx lasted so long (3 Intel generations for mobile) vendors had seen sales dip at the high margin (enthusiast mobile).
but there's more...
as i teased last week Re: Alienware's upcoming "M" series, ability to change/upgrade full, fat Turing, or go Max-Q with enhanced cooling (also an option).
but yeah vendors are excited to have current cpu/gpu combos for sale again. 10xx lasted so long (3 Intel generations for mobile) vendors had seen sales dip at the high margin (enthusiast mobile).
tunejunky
Senior Member
Posts: 800
Joined: 2017-08-18
Senior Member
Posts: 800
Joined: 2017-08-18
#5615807 Posted on: 12/10/2018 04:10 PM
then you're in good luck, you will be happy.
Let's see if the 30xx series from AMD can compete with the 2050/60, that's the real question for me, don't want to drop freesync or pay a few hundred extra just to gey gsync.
then you're in good luck, you will be happy.
H83
Senior Member
Posts: 2590
Joined: 2009-09-08
Senior Member
Posts: 2590
Joined: 2009-09-08
#5615812 Posted on: 12/10/2018 04:23 PM
Don´t tell me you don´t like Nvidia´s misleading marketing regarding mobile chips... Of course there´s a (small) chance that the 2060 is just a cut down 2070 with reduced RT capacity.
I thought the 2070 was supposed to be the lowest-end raytracing-capable GPU? If so, I think having the RTX 2060 is a bit confusing/misleading. As far as I'm concerned, non-RT GPUs should stick with GT(X).
Don´t tell me you don´t like Nvidia´s misleading marketing regarding mobile chips... Of course there´s a (small) chance that the 2060 is just a cut down 2070 with reduced RT capacity.
tensai28
Senior Member
Posts: 1393
Joined: 2013-10-31
Senior Member
Posts: 1393
Joined: 2013-10-31
#5615817 Posted on: 12/10/2018 04:38 PM
Just a repeat of what I've been saying all this time since the launch of the rtx series. The only card that makes any sense this new generation is the 2080ti.
Just a repeat of what I've been saying all this time since the launch of the rtx series. The only card that makes any sense this new generation is the 2080ti.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 3723
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 3723
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5615840 Posted on: 12/10/2018 05:31 PM
Huh? The 2080Ti is the one that makes the least sense so far (well, excluding Titans, but they have never made sense). The 2080Ti is disproportionately way too expensive and it doesn't handle raytracing a whole lot better than the 2080.
Just a repeat of what I've been saying all this time since the launch of the rtx series. The only card that makes any sense this new generation is the 2080ti.
Huh? The 2080Ti is the one that makes the least sense so far (well, excluding Titans, but they have never made sense). The 2080Ti is disproportionately way too expensive and it doesn't handle raytracing a whole lot better than the 2080.
tensai28
Senior Member
Posts: 1393
Joined: 2013-10-31
Senior Member
Posts: 1393
Joined: 2013-10-31
#5615841 Posted on: 12/10/2018 05:34 PM
I'm not talking about price. Outperforms the highest pascal card and has rediculusly good vr performance. Can't say the same about anything lower.
Huh? The 2080Ti is the one that makes the least sense so far (well, excluding Titans, but they have never made sense). The 2080Ti is disproportionately way too expensive and it doesn't handle raytracing a whole lot better than the 2080.
I'm not talking about price. Outperforms the highest pascal card and has rediculusly good vr performance. Can't say the same about anything lower.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 3723
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 3723
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5615842 Posted on: 12/10/2018 05:34 PM
Well if you ignore price then the RTX Titan makes more sense.
I'm not talking about price.
Well if you ignore price then the RTX Titan makes more sense.
tensai28
Senior Member
Posts: 1393
Joined: 2013-10-31
Senior Member
Posts: 1393
Joined: 2013-10-31
#5615844 Posted on: 12/10/2018 05:36 PM
Check my edit above. Not going to turn this into a price discussion.
Well if you ignore price then the RTX Titan makes more sense.
Check my edit above. Not going to turn this into a price discussion.
D3M1G0D
Senior Member
Posts: 1509
Joined: 2017-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1509
Joined: 2017-03-10
#5615851 Posted on: 12/10/2018 05:45 PM
I could see Nvidia pulling another GeForce 4 MX stunt with regard to RTX. It wouldn't be the first time that they've grossly misled consumers on GPU technology.
I agree that the 2080 Ti makes the least sense. The 1080 and 1080 Ti are EOL and the RTX 2070 and RTX 2080 make for decent replacements, respectively. Can't say that about the 2080 Ti.
I thought the 2070 was supposed to be the lowest-end raytracing-capable GPU? If so, I think having the RTX 2060 is a bit confusing/misleading. As far as I'm concerned, non-RT GPUs should stick with GT(X).
I could see Nvidia pulling another GeForce 4 MX stunt with regard to RTX. It wouldn't be the first time that they've grossly misled consumers on GPU technology.
Huh? The 2080Ti is the one that makes the least sense so far (well, excluding Titans, but they have never made sense). The 2080Ti is disproportionately way too expensive and it doesn't handle raytracing a whole lot better than the 2080.
I agree that the 2080 Ti makes the least sense. The 1080 and 1080 Ti are EOL and the RTX 2070 and RTX 2080 make for decent replacements, respectively. Can't say that about the 2080 Ti.
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 8453
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 8453
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5615897 Posted on: 12/10/2018 07:50 PM
Doubt that. Things are a bit different now. The slightest deviation from a 'proper card' and they will be eaten alive by the tech press. They know everyone is hungry for a good scandal involving Nvidia, so should tread carefully now. Last thing they need is another PR disaster.
I could see Nvidia pulling another GeForce 4 MX stunt with regard to RTX. It wouldn't be the first time that they've grossly misled consumers on GPU technology..
Doubt that. Things are a bit different now. The slightest deviation from a 'proper card' and they will be eaten alive by the tech press. They know everyone is hungry for a good scandal involving Nvidia, so should tread carefully now. Last thing they need is another PR disaster.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 154
Joined: 2016-04-15
Let's see if the 30xx series from AMD can compete with the 2050/60, that's the real question for me, don't want to drop freesync or pay a few hundred extra just to gey gsync.