Nvidia reports record sales and profit, with gaming income increasing by 85%.
Nvidia reported record quarterly sales of $6.5 billion in the second quarter of fiscal year 2022, the company's most recent quarter to report. That is a 15% increase over the previous quarter and a 68 percent increase over the same period the previous year. As is the first time the American corporation has made this much money in a single quarter. Profits of around USD 2.37 billion were earned on total sales of USD 2.37 billion.
In part, this is due to a record turnover in the gaming area, which has contributed to the positive results. When compared to the same quarter last year, more than USD 3 billion was earned in that region, representing an increase of more than 85 percent. This is most likely due to the fact that the costs and availability of RTX cards are steadily normalizing. The data center and professional visualization departments have also never been able to achieve such a high turnover.
The category 'OEM and others' has had the greatest growth in sales as compared to the previous year. This contains goods for other manufacturers, as well as products from CPM Corporation. This is the common denominator that Nvidia uses to group together items that are linked to crypto mining. Mining cards and other similar products accounted for more than half of the $409 million in sales in the OEM and other categories. Nvidia expects to generate nearly twice as much from cryptocurrency products as it does from traditional products. Despite the positive results, and perhaps as a result of the disappointing CPM income, Nvidia's share price has decreased by a few percentage points since the release of the quarterly results last week.
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Released For professionals - 08/11/2021 08:24 AM
The new NVIDIA RTX A2000—our most compact, power-efficient GPU for a wide range of standard and small-form-factor workstations—makes it easier to access RTX from anywhere....
AOC launches AGON PRO AG254FG with 360 Hz and Nvidia Reflex - 07/29/2021 05:14 PM
AOC rebrands its entire gaming segment to AGON by AOC and launches a whole new category for the esports and pro players with the latest technologies including 360 Hz refresh rate, 1 ms GtG response ti...
Battlefield 2042 will get DLSS and Nvidia Reflex support (but not raytracing?) - 06/30/2021 09:01 AM
EA announced that Nvidia will be their PC launch partner for Battlefield 2042, thus supporting DLSS and Nvidia Reflex, which would significantly improve the gaming experience for GeForce RTX graphics ...
ViewSonic Reveals ELITE Gaming Monitor Lineup with NVIDIA Reflex Technology - 06/03/2021 08:09 AM
ViewSonic, unveils ELITE professional gaming monitors armed with the latest NVIDIA Reflex and G-Sync technology. Delivering maximized latency improvements for high-velocity, graphics-intensive games, ...
EVGA X17 and X15 Gaming Mice Have NVIDIA Reflex Analyzer Support - 06/02/2021 01:34 PM
EVGA X17 / X15 Gaming Mice now support the revolutionary NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer, giving competitive gamers an accurate measurement of system latency for the first time....
Senior Member
Posts: 2353
Joined: 2018-04-10
I don't follow you!
Its him who compared Intel's yearly 20B with Nvidia's Quarterly 2.4. Calling it "shockingly low,".
To which I pointed out YEARLY.
And you said yes he said yearly.
He still insisted it's low. To which I added historical numbers.
And then you asked if I was saying that Intel has been on decline. In NV thread.
I get him, I don't get you at all LOL
EDIT: LOL you ninja

Oh, I completely missed the fact he was talking about Intel in his post, where he talked about 20B! My bad, I thought he was on topic and said Nvidia made 20B in 2020.
Nobody should be comparing apples to oranges, I'm with you. And yes, I ninja'd it because I felt like I was being an arse.
Senior Member
Posts: 6483
Joined: 2012-11-10
I didn't insist anything...
I acknowledge that there's a big difference between quarterly and yearly, though, considering Nvidia's demand (don't forget the server space, where they are doing very well), I would have expected higher from them.
What is up with people this week getting so fussy and argumentative?
Senior Member
Posts: 2353
Joined: 2018-04-10
Overall, we can all agree that Nvidia is closing the gap on Intel.
Love you all, you're a good bunch.
Senior Member
Posts: 2227
Joined: 2017-08-18
Included in the nVidia info, nVidia states that 80% of its Ampere GPUs went to gaming purchases--as opposed to miners, I suppose.
https://wccftech.com/nvidia-80-of-q2-ampere-shipments-were-to-gamers-confident-in-arm-deal-success/
Of course, nVidia doesn't say *how many* Ampere GPUs they've sold. But at least this clears up the "miners are buying all the new GPUs" myth that we see repeated so often with no supporting evidence...

nVidia CFO:
"Gaming revenue was up 85 percent from a year ago and up 11 percent sequentially, reflecting higher sales in GeForce GPUs and game-console SOCs. We continued to benefit from strong sales of our GeForce RTXTM 30 Series based on the NVIDIA Ampere architecture. We have introduced Low Hash Rate (LHR) GeForce GPUs with limited Ethereum mining capability and increased the supply of Cryptocurrency Mining Processors (CMP) in an effort to direct GeForce to gamers and CMP to miners. Over 80 percent of our Ampere architecture- based GeForce GPU shipments in the quarter were LHR GPUs. CMP is included in OEM."
Seems to boil down to yields, imo, for both the RTX-3k and the RDNA2 GPU shortages from nVidia and AMD, respectively. What really is annoying about these shortages is that both AMD and nVidia are loath to supply any specific information concerning these GPU shortages for the past 7/8 months. We get little more than evasion and obfuscation.
not just yields as those are better than ever before for both red and green (advantage red), but really just the folks lower down the supply chain dealing with covid (some using that 4 excuse for increase).
Senior Member
Posts: 8185
Joined: 2010-11-16
I don't follow you!
Its him who compared Intel's yearly 20B with Nvidia's Quarterly 2.4. Calling it "shockingly low,".
To which I pointed out YEARLY.
And you said yes he said yearly.
He still insisted it's low. To which I added historical numbers.
And then you asked if I was saying that Intel has been on decline. In NV thread.
I get him, I don't get you at all LOL
EDIT: LOL you ninja