Crucial P1 M.2 1000GB SSD Review
Corsair Force Series MP510 M.2 SSD Review
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Armor 8G review
ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 8GB review
Guru3D PC Buyers Guide Autumn 2018
TeamGroup MP32 M2 NVMe 480GB SSD Review
Terra Master F4-220 4 bay NAS review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING OC 11G review
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: PC graphics benchmark review
Seagate Fast SSD 1TB review
Nvidia Profits Tripled In Q4 2016
Nvidia is happy alright, the graphics chip (or should we say parralel computing) company increased its net profit to $ 655 million (614 million euros). That's a tripled compared to the same quarter a year earlier.
The news reaches us thjroug figures of the fourth financial quarter for 2016. Revenues grew to $ 2.17 billion, an increase of 55 percent compared with a year earlier. Revenues from Nvidia's data center division, which manufactures chips for include Amazon, Microsoft and Alibaba also has tripled which summed up towards 926 million USD in revenues.
Nvidia speaks of record figures. "Our GPU platform is increasingly being used for artificial intelligence, cloud computers, gaming and self-propelled vehicles," said Nvidia founder Jen-Hsun Huang.
The company has reached all of its goals that quarter in terms of gaming, visualization, data centers and self-propelled vehicles. Exact figures on some departments have not been shared.
Nvidia Prevents Reselling Bundled Games By Forcing GeForce Experience - 02/03/2017 12:51 PM
Right, this is going to be a complicated story to explain. As you guys know I have been rather critical towards what Nvidia is doing with GeForce Experience. At first it was intended to be a platform ...
Nvidia Pascal GP100 Die Shot Photo - 08/25/2016 10:05 AM
Over at the Hot Chips symposium Nvidia has been sharing a thing or two with media. Quite interesting is a new photo series of the GP100. Now do not confuse GP100 with the GP102 that is housed in the N...
Nvidia Pascal GP104-400 GPU photo surfaces and shows GDDR5X Memory - 04/25/2016 09:45 AM
Yet another PCB photo appeared with on it, a GPU seated. This time it is the GP104-400-A1 GPU which which would be the 3rd Pascal GPU surfacing, and kind of seems to cinfirm a 980 Ti succesor, the ...
NVIDIA partners halt GeForce GTX 970, 980, 980Ti production and GPU Pascal codenames surface - 04/13/2016 09:25 AM
In anticipation of upcoming Pascal products in the coming month or two, at least that's what hwbattle is reporting this morning. As we get closer to the actual launch more and more tiny little detai...
Nvidia Pascal Consumer card announced during Computex - 04/11/2016 02:48 PM
But they will launch later ... Nvidia is to announce its consumer grade Pascal graphics cards at Computex 2016 from May 31-June 4, graphics card manufacturers include Asus, Gigabyte and MSI. They wou...
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 1917
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 1917
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5390946 Posted on: 02/10/2017 03:01 PM
Nvidia should not make a same mistakes Intel currently makes. Intel slacked far too long, and result is now AMD will introduce a better product at lower price. Might be a substential kick for them, i doubt Vega will be much better then Pascal ( i will be disgusted if AMD wont at least match the gtx 1080 performance ) otherwise we will see next nvidia card gtx 1180 at 1500$ per piece. Disgusting.
Nvidia should not make a same mistakes Intel currently makes. Intel slacked far too long, and result is now AMD will introduce a better product at lower price. Might be a substential kick for them, i doubt Vega will be much better then Pascal ( i will be disgusted if AMD wont at least match the gtx 1080 performance ) otherwise we will see next nvidia card gtx 1180 at 1500$ per piece. Disgusting.
xIcarus
Senior Member
Posts: 927
Joined: 2010-08-24
Senior Member
Posts: 927
Joined: 2010-08-24
#5390955 Posted on: 02/10/2017 03:13 PM
Pascal release was very successful for Nvidia. Great performance of GTX1070 / GTX1080 finally justified people buying 1440@144hz panels. And while all this happening AMD has literally nothing to offer.
AMD stood still while people were throwing money at Nvidia.
Well normally I would argue that the 1070 and upper aren't a significant portion of the market, but last gen the 970 was the most popular gaming card.
AMD do have the 480 which is really a better choice in that segment (they've evolved really well from launch and they will probably ontinue to do so) - however they're not only losing sales from the high-end, but from the entry-level as well. The 460 is not a bad card but the 1050Ti is simply murder at the same price as the 4GB 460. It's not even remotely a competition.
The only cards AMD are massively selling right now are the 470 and 480, where the 1060 also competes (and is doing an ok job). The rest of the lineup simply goes to Nvidia.
Pascal release was very successful for Nvidia. Great performance of GTX1070 / GTX1080 finally justified people buying 1440@144hz panels. And while all this happening AMD has literally nothing to offer.
AMD stood still while people were throwing money at Nvidia.
Well normally I would argue that the 1070 and upper aren't a significant portion of the market, but last gen the 970 was the most popular gaming card.
AMD do have the 480 which is really a better choice in that segment (they've evolved really well from launch and they will probably ontinue to do so) - however they're not only losing sales from the high-end, but from the entry-level as well. The 460 is not a bad card but the 1050Ti is simply murder at the same price as the 4GB 460. It's not even remotely a competition.
The only cards AMD are massively selling right now are the 470 and 480, where the 1060 also competes (and is doing an ok job). The rest of the lineup simply goes to Nvidia.
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5101
Joined: 2003-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 5101
Joined: 2003-09-15
#5390956 Posted on: 02/10/2017 03:15 PM
Not suprised. Enjoying my card.
Not suprised. Enjoying my card.
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: 2010-11-16
Senior Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: 2010-11-16
#5390957 Posted on: 02/10/2017 03:21 PM
Insane profits and all around growth.
Nvidia is 60 billion $ company as of today.
Three years ago when GTX 780 Ti launched, Nvidia's total enterprise value was only 6 billion.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/enterprisevalue.asp
Insane profits and all around growth.
Nvidia is 60 billion $ company as of today.
Three years ago when GTX 780 Ti launched, Nvidia's total enterprise value was only 6 billion.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/enterprisevalue.asp
buhehe
Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 2016-07-25
Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 2016-07-25
#5390973 Posted on: 02/10/2017 03:38 PM
That's a nice looking crystal ball you have there
Nvidia should not make a same mistakes Intel currently makes. Intel slacked far too long, and result is now AMD will introduce a better product at lower price
That's a nice looking crystal ball you have there
nz3777
Senior Member
Posts: 2260
Joined: 2014-01-21
Senior Member
Posts: 2260
Joined: 2014-01-21
#5390988 Posted on: 02/10/2017 03:57 PM
I am not surprised at all,Team Green has been calling the shot's for some time now and I do not see that changing anytime soon! My last Amd gpu was a Radeon 6970 I have not looked back since then, the only card I was considering at the time was a R9 290X, and I still like the 295x2- Beast of a card! I do wonder howcome both Nvidia does not make dual-gpu video card's anymore?
Looking at old Gpu benchmark's is not as fun as before,It was like porn to me. Haha
I am not surprised at all,Team Green has been calling the shot's for some time now and I do not see that changing anytime soon! My last Amd gpu was a Radeon 6970 I have not looked back since then, the only card I was considering at the time was a R9 290X, and I still like the 295x2- Beast of a card! I do wonder howcome both Nvidia does not make dual-gpu video card's anymore?
Looking at old Gpu benchmark's is not as fun as before,It was like porn to me. Haha
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 3231
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 3231
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5390991 Posted on: 02/10/2017 04:05 PM
Pascal release was very successful for Nvidia. Great performance of GTX1070 / GTX1080 finally justified people buying 1440@144hz panels. And while all this happening AMD has literally nothing to offer.
AMD stood still while people were throwing money at Nvidia.
Very presumptuous of you. We enthusiasts are a relatively small crowd. I highly doubt that Nvidia's growth came from the 1070 and 1080 - the 1070, though fairly priced, is still expensive, and the 1080 is really a niche market. There are more likely causes for Nvidia's success, such as the 1050Ti, 1060, mobile platforms, maybe Nintendo Switch, but most of all, servers (which likely make up more of their revenue than all their other sales combined). Also, AMD wasn't standing still, they were (and still are) in the process of getting the 490 released. Pascal was released at a pretty inconvenient time for them.
Regardless, I'd say Nvidia did earn their success. Pascal is the best thing they released since their Tesla architecture, and they're a very solid competitor in ARM.
Pascal release was very successful for Nvidia. Great performance of GTX1070 / GTX1080 finally justified people buying 1440@144hz panels. And while all this happening AMD has literally nothing to offer.
AMD stood still while people were throwing money at Nvidia.
Very presumptuous of you. We enthusiasts are a relatively small crowd. I highly doubt that Nvidia's growth came from the 1070 and 1080 - the 1070, though fairly priced, is still expensive, and the 1080 is really a niche market. There are more likely causes for Nvidia's success, such as the 1050Ti, 1060, mobile platforms, maybe Nintendo Switch, but most of all, servers (which likely make up more of their revenue than all their other sales combined). Also, AMD wasn't standing still, they were (and still are) in the process of getting the 490 released. Pascal was released at a pretty inconvenient time for them.
Regardless, I'd say Nvidia did earn their success. Pascal is the best thing they released since their Tesla architecture, and they're a very solid competitor in ARM.
chronek
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 2016-09-19
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 2016-09-19
#5390997 Posted on: 02/10/2017 04:09 PM
Now you know whay NVidia inccreased their gpu prices (when production cost goes lower) they do it just for happy announcment of doubled, tripled, quadrupled, tredecupled profit... Everything just for announce...
Now you know whay NVidia inccreased their gpu prices (when production cost goes lower) they do it just for happy announcment of doubled, tripled, quadrupled, tredecupled profit... Everything just for announce...
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 6967
Joined: 2014-09-27
Senior Member
Posts: 6967
Joined: 2014-09-27
#5391008 Posted on: 02/10/2017 04:37 PM
I'm glad for that actually. I don't like a lot of their practices, but NVIDIA has been a small company showing that with the proper talent you can do miracles.
I'm glad for that actually. I don't like a lot of their practices, but NVIDIA has been a small company showing that with the proper talent you can do miracles.
chronek
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 2016-09-19
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 2016-09-19
#5391018 Posted on: 02/10/2017 04:52 PM
i hope you know that their success is only because no competition over last years, they are alone on market (amd bought ati but gpu is not their main product and other corps leaved long time ago, nvidia dictate everything)
I'm glad for that actually. I don't like a lot of their practices, but NVIDIA has been a small company showing that with the proper talent you can do miracles.
i hope you know that their success is only because no competition over last years, they are alone on market (amd bought ati but gpu is not their main product and other corps leaved long time ago, nvidia dictate everything)
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 11565
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 11565
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5391035 Posted on: 02/10/2017 05:15 PM
Now you know whay NVidia inccreased their gpu prices (when production cost goes lower) they do it just for happy announcment of doubled, tripled, quadrupled, tredecupled profit... Everything just for announce...
When did production costs go lower? Architectures are more expensive than ever to develop. 16nmFF was the first die shrink that didn't bring cost savings per transistor.
Very presumptuous of you. We enthusiasts are a relatively small crowd. I highly doubt that Nvidia's growth came from the 1070 and 1080 - the 1070, though fairly priced, is still expensive, and the 1080 is really a niche market. There are more likely causes for Nvidia's success, such as the 1050Ti, 1060, mobile platforms, maybe Nintendo Switch, but most of all, servers (which likely make up more of their revenue than all their other sales combined). Also, AMD wasn't standing still, they were (and still are) in the process of getting the 490 released. Pascal was released at a pretty inconvenient time for them.
Regardless, I'd say Nvidia did earn their success. Pascal is the best thing they released since their Tesla architecture, and they're a very solid competitor in ARM.
Gaming makes up the most of their revenue, $1.348B. Datacenters were only $296M. GTX1070 only trails the 1060 by .68% marketshare on steam where as the 1080 is 2% lower. When you consider the margins on the 1070, I think it's a safe bet that a huge chunk of their profit is coming from it. I don't know whether AMD having a card in that price range would have made much of a difference though - it didn't really seem to matter with Maxwell despite the fact that the 970 was arguably the lesser card.
i hope you know that their success is only because no competition over last years, they are alone on market (amd bought ati but gpu is not their main product and other corps leaved long time ago, nvidia dictate everything)
AMD is far more competitive in graphics than they are in CPUs. Fury X was basically right on the heels of a 980Ti and at various price points AMD actually beats Nvidia. So I'm not sure why you think Nvidia has no competition.
Now you know whay NVidia inccreased their gpu prices (when production cost goes lower) they do it just for happy announcment of doubled, tripled, quadrupled, tredecupled profit... Everything just for announce...
When did production costs go lower? Architectures are more expensive than ever to develop. 16nmFF was the first die shrink that didn't bring cost savings per transistor.
Very presumptuous of you. We enthusiasts are a relatively small crowd. I highly doubt that Nvidia's growth came from the 1070 and 1080 - the 1070, though fairly priced, is still expensive, and the 1080 is really a niche market. There are more likely causes for Nvidia's success, such as the 1050Ti, 1060, mobile platforms, maybe Nintendo Switch, but most of all, servers (which likely make up more of their revenue than all their other sales combined). Also, AMD wasn't standing still, they were (and still are) in the process of getting the 490 released. Pascal was released at a pretty inconvenient time for them.
Regardless, I'd say Nvidia did earn their success. Pascal is the best thing they released since their Tesla architecture, and they're a very solid competitor in ARM.
Gaming makes up the most of their revenue, $1.348B. Datacenters were only $296M. GTX1070 only trails the 1060 by .68% marketshare on steam where as the 1080 is 2% lower. When you consider the margins on the 1070, I think it's a safe bet that a huge chunk of their profit is coming from it. I don't know whether AMD having a card in that price range would have made much of a difference though - it didn't really seem to matter with Maxwell despite the fact that the 970 was arguably the lesser card.
i hope you know that their success is only because no competition over last years, they are alone on market (amd bought ati but gpu is not their main product and other corps leaved long time ago, nvidia dictate everything)
AMD is far more competitive in graphics than they are in CPUs. Fury X was basically right on the heels of a 980Ti and at various price points AMD actually beats Nvidia. So I'm not sure why you think Nvidia has no competition.
riot83
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-02-13
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-02-13
#5391036 Posted on: 02/10/2017 05:17 PM
Very presumptuous of you. We enthusiasts are a relatively small crowd. I highly doubt that Nvidia's growth came from the 1070 and 1080 - the 1070, though fairly priced, is still expensive, and the 1080 is really a niche market. There are more likely causes for Nvidia's success, such as the 1050Ti, 1060, mobile platforms, maybe Nintendo Switch, but most of all, servers (which likely make up more of their revenue than all their other sales combined). Also, AMD wasn't standing still, they were (and still are) in the process of getting the 490 released. Pascal was released at a pretty inconvenient time for them.
Regardless, I'd say Nvidia did earn their success. Pascal is the best thing they released since their Tesla architecture, and they're a very solid competitor in ARM.
Actually it is the highend that is bringing in the most money:
https://www.jonpeddie.com/press-releases/details/pc-gaming-hardware-market-minting-billions
Very presumptuous of you. We enthusiasts are a relatively small crowd. I highly doubt that Nvidia's growth came from the 1070 and 1080 - the 1070, though fairly priced, is still expensive, and the 1080 is really a niche market. There are more likely causes for Nvidia's success, such as the 1050Ti, 1060, mobile platforms, maybe Nintendo Switch, but most of all, servers (which likely make up more of their revenue than all their other sales combined). Also, AMD wasn't standing still, they were (and still are) in the process of getting the 490 released. Pascal was released at a pretty inconvenient time for them.
Regardless, I'd say Nvidia did earn their success. Pascal is the best thing they released since their Tesla architecture, and they're a very solid competitor in ARM.
Actually it is the highend that is bringing in the most money:
https://www.jonpeddie.com/press-releases/details/pc-gaming-hardware-market-minting-billions
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 6967
Joined: 2014-09-27
Senior Member
Posts: 6967
Joined: 2014-09-27
#5391044 Posted on: 02/10/2017 05:32 PM
There is competition just fine actually. This is the first year that AMD didn't have a $400+ contender, and it's starting to look that it happened because their next top end is going to be here almost a year earlier than NVIDIA's. This is not at all like the CPU race.
NVIDIA is making a lot of money because they had the brains to invest in using GPUs for other tasks, most notably deep learning. They are getting crazy amounts of money from that, and CUDA is the de facto standard for the academia.
i hope you know that their success is only because no competition over last years, they are alone on market (amd bought ati but gpu is not their main product and other corps leaved long time ago, nvidia dictate everything)
There is competition just fine actually. This is the first year that AMD didn't have a $400+ contender, and it's starting to look that it happened because their next top end is going to be here almost a year earlier than NVIDIA's. This is not at all like the CPU race.
NVIDIA is making a lot of money because they had the brains to invest in using GPUs for other tasks, most notably deep learning. They are getting crazy amounts of money from that, and CUDA is the de facto standard for the academia.
fry178
Senior Member
Posts: 865
Joined: 2012-04-30
Senior Member
Posts: 865
Joined: 2012-04-30
#5391057 Posted on: 02/10/2017 05:54 PM
@chronek
****ty when you can't validate that statement.
please go back 10y, or even to 4600TI days, and check prices for all of the top 2 models until last year, and compare to price for 1070/1080.
from exceptions , i dont see a big difference in prices.
2002: 4600ti sells for 400$
2017: 1080 sells for 600$
thats + 14$/per year, yeah, Nv really milking us here...
and im even ignoring things like changes in cost/inflation etc...
@chronek
****ty when you can't validate that statement.
please go back 10y, or even to 4600TI days, and check prices for all of the top 2 models until last year, and compare to price for 1070/1080.
from exceptions , i dont see a big difference in prices.
2002: 4600ti sells for 400$
2017: 1080 sells for 600$
thats + 14$/per year, yeah, Nv really milking us here...
and im even ignoring things like changes in cost/inflation etc...
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 4214
Joined: 2011-01-02
Pascal release was very successful for Nvidia. Great performance of GTX1070 / GTX1080 finally justified people buying 1440@144hz panels. And while all this happening AMD has literally nothing to offer.
AMD stood still while people were throwing money at Nvidia.