TRENDnet 5-port Unmanaged 2.5G Switch review
Powercolor RX 6700 XT Hellhound Spectral White review
Resident Evil Village: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Enermax LIQMAX III aRGB 240mm review
PCIe Resizable BAR Performance AMD and NVIDIA benchmarks
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2021
Intel Core i7 11700KF processor review
Acer Predator Apollo and Predator Talos DRAM Review
ASUS TUF Z590-Plus WIFI review
ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D OC review
Nvidia looking into problem high IDLE power usage vs high refreshrate
The IDLE power consumption of Nvidia graphics cards in combination with a GSYNC monitor with a high refresh-rate is much higher compared to regular monitors. Nvidia confirmed the problem and is working on a solution.
During testing of a Asus PG279Q Ryan Shrout from PC Perspective discovered this abnormal behaviour. The 27"-in GSYNC monitor at 165 Hz made his test system use much more power in Idle opposed to your regular PC at a 60Hz refresh-rate.
The power consumption differences in IDLE are massive, at 60 Hz the PC utilizes 74 Watts, yet at 165Hz his PC started using 201 Watts in IDLE, yes that's just displaying your idle Windows desktop.Once you look at the graphics card (in this case a GeForce GTX 980 Ti) the problem becomes abundantly clear, ay 60 Hz the card will have a baseclock of 135 MHz and with 120Hz or higher, the cards kicks in and remains at 885 MHz. The problem only seems to be focusing at GSYNC monitors. Disabling GSYNC does not change the power consumption at 144 Hz.
NVIDIA is looking into this and has found the problem. They will issue a fix with a driver future update.
NVIDIA launches new Bullets or Blade bundle - 10/06/2015 07:24 PM
Gamers that purchase a GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 980 or 970 GPU , or 970M or above notebook will be able to pick up a from copy of either Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege or Assassin's Creed Syndicate for f...
Nvidia launches Quadro M6000 and Quadro VCA 2015 renderserver - 03/20/2015 01:57 PM
Shortly after the GTX Titan X launch Nvidia now releases the Quadro M600 based on the same GM200 GPU, also with 12 GB of vram. Nvidia also is launching a Quadro VCA 2015 renderserver....
JPR AMD Climbs 11% in GPU Shipments in Q2, Intel up 4% NVIDIA Lower - 08/19/2014 09:03 AM
Jon Peddie Research (JPR) announced estimated graphics chip shipments and suppliers' market share for 2014 2Q. Graphics chips are without doubt one of the most powerful, exciting, and essential compo...
NVIDIA Launches K5200, K4200, K2200, K620 and K420 Professional GPU Lineup - 08/12/2014 09:46 PM
NVIDIA today unveiled its next generation of NVIDIA Quadro GPUs -- providing new tools and technologies to meet the visual computing needs of the world's leading designers, artists and scientists. Th...
NVIDIA Launches NVLINK - High-Speed GPU Interconnect - 03/25/2014 07:33 PM
NVIDIA announced that it plans to integrate a high-speed interconnect, called NVIDIA NVLink, into its future GPUs, enabling GPUs and CPUs to share data five to 12 times faster than they can today. Thi...
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 12182
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 12182
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5185883 Posted on: 11/09/2015 03:38 PM
Have you checked if you actually go back to 144Hz during gaming?
I turned down the refresh rate to 120Hz, but my XB270HU showed it to stick to 120Hz Gsync even if I turn on a game (BF4 for instance). I then switched back to 144Hz on desktop too to get what I bought my hardware for during playing. At least the monitor's OSD states it doesn't go up to 144Hz and sticks to 120Hz, as I don't have a high speed camera I can't really check
Noticed this on my system a while back. Changing the desktop resolution to 120hz fixed it for me. Now I idle at 135mhz instead of the 900mhz it idled at 144hz.
Have you checked if you actually go back to 144Hz during gaming?
I turned down the refresh rate to 120Hz, but my XB270HU showed it to stick to 120Hz Gsync even if I turn on a game (BF4 for instance). I then switched back to 144Hz on desktop too to get what I bought my hardware for during playing. At least the monitor's OSD states it doesn't go up to 144Hz and sticks to 120Hz, as I don't have a high speed camera I can't really check
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 10140
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 10140
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5185927 Posted on: 11/09/2015 04:25 PM
Have you checked if you actually go back to 144Hz during gaming?
I turned down the refresh rate to 120Hz, but my XB270HU showed it to stick to 120Hz Gsync even if I turn on a game (BF4 for instance). I then switched back to 144Hz on desktop too to get what I bought my hardware for during playing. At least the monitor's OSD states it doesn't go up to 144Hz and sticks to 120Hz, as I don't have a high speed camera I can't really check
Did you select 'prefer max refresh rate' in Nv CP? I heard this fix working for others, that if monitor is set to 120hz, it will stick to that at idle but use higher in gaming.
Have you checked if you actually go back to 144Hz during gaming?
I turned down the refresh rate to 120Hz, but my XB270HU showed it to stick to 120Hz Gsync even if I turn on a game (BF4 for instance). I then switched back to 144Hz on desktop too to get what I bought my hardware for during playing. At least the monitor's OSD states it doesn't go up to 144Hz and sticks to 120Hz, as I don't have a high speed camera I can't really check
Did you select 'prefer max refresh rate' in Nv CP? I heard this fix working for others, that if monitor is set to 120hz, it will stick to that at idle but use higher in gaming.
Szaby59
Member
Posts: 84
Joined: 2014-07-23
Member
Posts: 84
Joined: 2014-07-23
#5185932 Posted on: 11/09/2015 04:32 PM
AMD should do the same with the R9 Fury/X/Nano Display Corruption issue
AMD should do the same with the R9 Fury/X/Nano Display Corruption issue
Forebode
Junior Member
Posts: 17
Joined: 2015-09-04
Junior Member
Posts: 17
Joined: 2015-09-04
#5185935 Posted on: 11/09/2015 04:36 PM
The IDLE power consumption of Nvidia graphics cards in combination with a GSYNC monitor with a high refresh-rate is much higher compared to regular monitors. Nvidia confirmed the problem and is workin...
This just proves that Nvidia doesn't read it's own forums. This problem was reported awhile ago. Users were using the vBios tweaker to change the power states. Or setting their performance rates to be a lower refreshrate on the desktop.
Yes, higher refreshrate requires more power, but it should be double or triple the power of 60hz idle, Not full.
The IDLE power consumption of Nvidia graphics cards in combination with a GSYNC monitor with a high refresh-rate is much higher compared to regular monitors. Nvidia confirmed the problem and is workin...
This just proves that Nvidia doesn't read it's own forums. This problem was reported awhile ago. Users were using the vBios tweaker to change the power states. Or setting their performance rates to be a lower refreshrate on the desktop.
Yes, higher refreshrate requires more power, but it should be double or triple the power of 60hz idle, Not full.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 7747
Joined: 2005-12-06
Noticed this on my system a while back. Changing the desktop resolution to 120hz fixed it for me. Now I idle at 135mhz instead of the 900mhz it idled at 144hz.