HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB 32GB 2933 MHz review
Nvidia Turing GeForce 2080 (Ti) architecture review
Ballistix Sport AT Gaming DDR4 RGB 32GB 3000 MHz review
Seagate Barracuda Pro 14TB HDD review
ASUS ROG STRIX B450-I Gaming review
Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks
MSI MEG X399 Creation review
be quiet! Silent Base 601 review
Deepcool Gamerstorm Castle 240 RGB AIO review
Strange Brigade: PC graphics performance benchmark review
NVIDIA GTX 1070 Ti 3DMark Benchmark Results
We talked about the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for numerous times now, it was bound to happen as the first 3DMark results have arrived of the product. Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 Ti for 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme and Time Spy.
According to this early rsult set the card beats the AMD's Radeon RX Vega 56 in the Time Spy benchmark which kind of is the point for this product. In Strike Extreme the two are tight and close together. The results sets have been spotted by videocardz. It will be intersting to see what the AIB partners have to offer with the custom models, clock frequencies and final drivers.
I have added the fastest GPU score result set into the mix of our own charts, for a bit of comparison and overview. That pretty much will paint the pictures and seems spot on really. you can also really tell what Nvidia has been aiming for, a product that trumps the Vega 56. Below you can click and check the result sets from videocardz.
Download: Nvidia GeForce 387.92 WHQL driver - 10/09/2017 02:40 PM
You can now download the new Nvidia GeForce GameReady 387.92 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA. This driver is optimal for Middle-earth: Shadow of War, The Evil Within 2, and Forza Motorsport 7. Dow...
Razer Offers Blade Pro with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Graphics - 09/01/2017 08:23 AM
Razer launches an updated configuration option for the Razer Blade Pro, a Full HD display and an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 GPU. This new options aims at a lower price over the Razer Blade Pro with a GeF...
NVIDIA Gamescom Announcements - 08/22/2017 09:11 AM
At 345,000 gamers strong, Gamescom is the world’s largest gaming show making it the perfect back drop to talk about what NVIDIA and a few of our friends in game development have coming up. ...
Download: Nvidia GeForce 382.53 WHQL driver - 06/09/2017 05:49 PM
Nvidia releasedGeForce 382.53 WHQL drivers, these drives are optimized for DiRT 4 and Nex Machina. NVIDIA also added added/updated SLI profiles for Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition, Little Nightmare...
Could This Be NVIDIA Geforce GTX TITAN Volta ? - 05/23/2017 08:54 AM
Well, the rumor mill is already starting on Volta graphics cards. While highly unlikely, a new photo is spreading on the web like wildfire. The card in the photo is hinted to be Volta....
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 1847
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 1847
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5483280 Posted on: 10/19/2017 09:46 AM
How can you force an OC (clock) cap, assuming it's made on software level not hardware? If that's the case, a Flash should remove it?
All in all it beats Vega 56, so I guess that was its main purpose.
How can you force an OC (clock) cap, assuming it's made on software level not hardware? If that's the case, a Flash should remove it?
All in all it beats Vega 56, so I guess that was its main purpose.
The Goose
Senior Member
Posts: 2128
Joined: 2008-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 2128
Joined: 2008-02-25
#5483294 Posted on: 10/19/2017 10:20 AM
Well i get 6325 with my Evga 1070FTW and time spy doesn't even use boost so runs my 1070ftw card at 1607mhz for the gpu tests and yet my games use boost at 2000mhz or just below, either way....not worth the upgrade, shame they kept it in the draw so long.
Well i get 6325 with my Evga 1070FTW and time spy doesn't even use boost so runs my 1070ftw card at 1607mhz for the gpu tests and yet my games use boost at 2000mhz or just below, either way....not worth the upgrade, shame they kept it in the draw so long.
xIcarus
Senior Member
Posts: 924
Joined: 2010-08-24
Senior Member
Posts: 924
Joined: 2010-08-24
#5483296 Posted on: 10/19/2017 10:26 AM
How can you force an OC (clock) cap, assuming it's made on software level not hardware? If that's the case, a Flash should remove it?
All in all it beats Vega 56, so I guess that was its main purpose.
In theory you could only sell lower binned cards which will refuse to clock further because the hardware can't do it.
But practically, that's financial suicide. So it's surely gonna be a software barrier.
Not sure if you can handicap the card afterwards though. Works for taking out cores but I doubt you can do something about the clocks, not accurately at least.
Or perhaps it's better if we don't give them any ideas.
How can you force an OC (clock) cap, assuming it's made on software level not hardware? If that's the case, a Flash should remove it?
All in all it beats Vega 56, so I guess that was its main purpose.
In theory you could only sell lower binned cards which will refuse to clock further because the hardware can't do it.
But practically, that's financial suicide. So it's surely gonna be a software barrier.
Not sure if you can handicap the card afterwards though. Works for taking out cores but I doubt you can do something about the clocks, not accurately at least.
Or perhaps it's better if we don't give them any ideas.
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 8906
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 8906
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5483301 Posted on: 10/19/2017 10:38 AM
How can you force an OC (clock) cap, assuming it's made on software level not hardware? If that's the case, a Flash should remove it?
All in all it beats Vega 56, so I guess that was its main purpose.
In theory you could only sell lower binned cards which will refuse to clock further because the hardware can't do it.
But practically, that's financial suicide. So it's surely gonna be a software barrier.
Not sure if you can handicap the card afterwards though. Works for taking out cores but I doubt you can do something about the clocks, not accurately at least.
Or perhaps it's better if we don't give them any ideas.
Indeed it's a matter of BIOS and what's flashed onto it. Yet, as there is no real vbios editing for Pascal, it's fairly reasonable to be limited that way, and probably hard to get around unless the AIB partners start to put their own, overclocked versions out. Before that happens, there probably won't be any way to surpass the BIOS limitation.
How can you force an OC (clock) cap, assuming it's made on software level not hardware? If that's the case, a Flash should remove it?
All in all it beats Vega 56, so I guess that was its main purpose.
In theory you could only sell lower binned cards which will refuse to clock further because the hardware can't do it.
But practically, that's financial suicide. So it's surely gonna be a software barrier.
Not sure if you can handicap the card afterwards though. Works for taking out cores but I doubt you can do something about the clocks, not accurately at least.
Or perhaps it's better if we don't give them any ideas.
Indeed it's a matter of BIOS and what's flashed onto it. Yet, as there is no real vbios editing for Pascal, it's fairly reasonable to be limited that way, and probably hard to get around unless the AIB partners start to put their own, overclocked versions out. Before that happens, there probably won't be any way to surpass the BIOS limitation.
beta-sama
Senior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: 2012-11-14
Senior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: 2012-11-14
#5483315 Posted on: 10/19/2017 11:19 AM
also the screenshot shows graphics score of 6777 not 6816 as the guru3d chart does... what gives?
I have added the fastest GPU score result set into the mix of our own charts, for a bit of comparison and overview
The Goose
Senior Member
Posts: 2128
Joined: 2008-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 2128
Joined: 2008-02-25
#5483321 Posted on: 10/19/2017 11:39 AM
Timespy does use boost, it gives a valid test but it just gives a score of 0, also i use Evga precision XOC to monitor gpu and cpu so stop talking out your a$$
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/2568869 .....from an earlier test(the only test that validated today but power set to opitmal).
Dont people just hate it when they are proved wrong.
Timespy does use boost, it gives a valid test but it just gives a score of 0, also i use Evga precision XOC to monitor gpu and cpu so stop talking out your a$$
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/2568869 .....from an earlier test(the only test that validated today but power set to opitmal).
Dont people just hate it when they are proved wrong.
Ricepudding
Senior Member
Posts: 377
Joined: 2017-02-17
Senior Member
Posts: 377
Joined: 2017-02-17
#5483326 Posted on: 10/19/2017 11:51 AM
Even if the rumours are true that it can't OC i think this card still does what it is intended to do, i mean the score is only 7-8% of a GTX 1080... that being said i don't see why it couldn't overclock, nvidia has never really stopped people before even on the M series least from my experience
Even if the rumours are true that it can't OC i think this card still does what it is intended to do, i mean the score is only 7-8% of a GTX 1080... that being said i don't see why it couldn't overclock, nvidia has never really stopped people before even on the M series least from my experience
The Goose
Senior Member
Posts: 2128
Joined: 2008-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 2128
Joined: 2008-02-25
#5483329 Posted on: 10/19/2017 11:59 AM
I know the FTW is supposed to be 1797 but mine boosts to 2000....maybe the fixed bios changed that or the Fujipoly thermal pads do a better job than the bog standard pads that were fitted or maybe evga precision wasnt displaying the boost clocks on that run...but any way my point is the ti doesnt give enough boost over what i have now to warrant losing money to sell my FTW and spending even more money on the ti for a few extra fps.
I know the FTW is supposed to be 1797 but mine boosts to 2000....maybe the fixed bios changed that or the Fujipoly thermal pads do a better job than the bog standard pads that were fitted or maybe evga precision wasnt displaying the boost clocks on that run...but any way my point is the ti doesnt give enough boost over what i have now to warrant losing money to sell my FTW and spending even more money on the ti for a few extra fps.
Matt26LFC
Senior Member
Posts: 3049
Joined: 2008-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 3049
Joined: 2008-01-06
#5483337 Posted on: 10/19/2017 12:21 PM
They don't want people to buy the cheaper 1070Ti and OC it to 1080 levels, not complicated really.
Even if the rumours are true that it can't OC i think this card still does what it is intended to do, i mean the score is only 7-8% of a GTX 1080... that being said i don't see why it couldn't overclock, nvidia has never really stopped people before even on the M series least from my experience
They don't want people to buy the cheaper 1070Ti and OC it to 1080 levels, not complicated really.
robbo247
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2009-10-27
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2009-10-27
#5483341 Posted on: 10/19/2017 12:30 PM
My msi 1070 runs extreme with a score of 8722 (OVERCLOCKED THOUGH)on an old 1155 2700k ,never upgraded from 1155 as no point as already running better than the Ti and vanilla 1080 and yes timespy should run max clock as mine shows 2060mhz on gpu in afterburner in all tests apart from cpu only tests. if yours isnt something may be wrong try fresh driver install...
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/13812295
My msi 1070 runs extreme with a score of 8722 (OVERCLOCKED THOUGH)on an old 1155 2700k ,never upgraded from 1155 as no point as already running better than the Ti and vanilla 1080 and yes timespy should run max clock as mine shows 2060mhz on gpu in afterburner in all tests apart from cpu only tests. if yours isnt something may be wrong try fresh driver install...
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/13812295
Venix
Senior Member
Posts: 530
Joined: 2016-08-01
Senior Member
Posts: 530
Joined: 2016-08-01
#5483347 Posted on: 10/19/2017 01:06 PM
My msi 1070 runs extreme with a score of 8722 (OVERCLOCKED THOUGH)on an old 1155 2700k ,never upgraded from 1155 as no point as already running better than the Ti and vanilla 1080 and yes timespy should run max clock as mine shows 2060mhz on gpu in afterburner in all tests apart from cpu only tests. if yours isnt something may be wrong try fresh driver install...
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/13812295
is this your 24/7 overclock ? if yes ! damn nice score brother !
My msi 1070 runs extreme with a score of 8722 (OVERCLOCKED THOUGH)on an old 1155 2700k ,never upgraded from 1155 as no point as already running better than the Ti and vanilla 1080 and yes timespy should run max clock as mine shows 2060mhz on gpu in afterburner in all tests apart from cpu only tests. if yours isnt something may be wrong try fresh driver install...
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/13812295
is this your 24/7 overclock ? if yes ! damn nice score brother !
robbo247
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2009-10-27
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2009-10-27
#5483348 Posted on: 10/19/2017 01:25 PM
yep 24/7 apart from the mandatory downclock to 139mhz when in 2d..
yep 24/7 apart from the mandatory downclock to 139mhz when in 2d..
Venix
Senior Member
Posts: 530
Joined: 2016-08-01
Senior Member
Posts: 530
Joined: 2016-08-01
#5483350 Posted on: 10/19/2017 01:39 PM
absolutely no reason to stress the card or burn the electricity when you are on desktop
nice nice !
yep 24/7 apart from the mandatory downclock to 139mhz when in 2d..
absolutely no reason to stress the card or burn the electricity when you are on desktop
nice nice !
Koniakki
Senior Member
Posts: 2545
Joined: 2009-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 2545
Joined: 2009-09-15
#5483356 Posted on: 10/19/2017 02:01 PM
Wasn't this discussed previously, that the "OC handicap" it simply means that AIB partners cannot offer factory OC variants of the cards and all 1070Ti will have same base/boost BUT can be OC'ed manually?
Quote from Hilbert's article:
"is that the clock frequency cannot be changed by board partners (factory tweaks) by the AIB partners, e.g. all cards would be clocked the same 1607/1683 MHz base boost clock. "
And from the rough translation of Expreview:
"regardless of which you buy a GTX 1070 Ti their frequency will be fixed at 1607MHz-1683MHz , if you want to be stronger performance only Can be manual overclocking"
Or did I miss anything new? :p
Wasn't this discussed previously, that the "OC handicap" it simply means that AIB partners cannot offer factory OC variants of the cards and all 1070Ti will have same base/boost BUT can be OC'ed manually?
Quote from Hilbert's article:
"is that the clock frequency cannot be changed by board partners (factory tweaks) by the AIB partners, e.g. all cards would be clocked the same 1607/1683 MHz base boost clock. "
And from the rough translation of Expreview:
"regardless of which you buy a GTX 1070 Ti their frequency will be fixed at 1607MHz-1683MHz , if you want to be stronger performance only Can be manual overclocking"
Or did I miss anything new? :p
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 4116
Joined: 2011-01-02
Very reasonable position performance wise.
Hopefully non-OC rumors are false. I would love to have this GPU and overclock it up to GTX1080 level.
Also don't go over $429 please!