Be Quiet! Pure Power 12 M - 850W ATX 3.0 PSU review
Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Surfaces in 3DMark
I am on a trip right now so i'll have to keep it short, but 3Dmark numbers of a GeForce GTX 1080 surfaced.
The benchmarks leaked from videocardz, to be mroe specific the results hint at a GTX 1080 running on early drivers which was measured on two PCs. One was run with a Core i7-5820K processor and scored P19005 on 3DMark 11 (performance preset). The second entry was based on a Core i7-3770K processor and reached 8959 points on 3DMark FireStrike Extreme. Such scores if the 1080 are higher opposed to the GTX 980 Ti.
« Rumor: YouTube to Stream TV channels though paid subscription · NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Surfaces in 3DMark
· AMD Radeon Software Crimson Edition 16.5.1 Beta Drivers Out »
Download Nvidia GeForce 365.10 WHQL driver - 05/02/2016 05:57 PM
You can now download Nvidia GeForce 365.10 WHQL drivers. These drivers are game-ready for "Forza Motorsport 6," "Overwatch: Open Beta," "Paragon Beta," and "...
Rumor: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Ti Would get GP104 ASIC - 05/02/2016 08:06 AM
Let's call it rumor Monday today ? It looks like there will be another SKU, or let me rephrase that, there's rumor of another ASIC from NVIDIA. It would be the GP104. Earlier on we indicated the Ge...
Nvidia GP100 GPU architecture recap - full GPU has 3840 Shader processors - 04/12/2016 09:19 AM
Last week Nvidia announced the GP100 GPU powering the Tesla P100 HPC module. With more and more rumors are surfacing about GP104 as well. Since the full block diagrams are now available, we can also ...
Download Nvidia GeForce 364.72 WHQL drivers - 03/28/2016 03:17 PM
You can download the new Nvidia GeForce 364.72 WHQL driver for Windows 7 - 8.1 and 10 in 32 and 64-bit flavors. This title adds VR support and game ready support for Quantum Break, Killer Instinct, ...
Nvidia GeForce X80 and X80 Ti Pascal Specs? - 03/17/2016 08:57 AM
In our forums somebody posted the spec list shown after the break. Indicating the Pascal graphics cards would be called GeForce X80 and X80Ti....
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 17811
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 17811
Joined: 2012-05-18
#5267387 Posted on: 05/05/2016 05:42 PM
I think I get those scores in 3dmark11 now at 1418mhz, if not alittle higher.. need to double check., ok 3dmark extreme is 800points higher, but thats minimal.. 1-2fps
Overall its as expected, Im betting on at least 550$/€., oc probably up to 2000mhz.
I was going to skip this one and looks like I'll just wait for Volta / Navi.
dunno I dont regret buying 980ti now.. payed 420€ 980ti and it delivers, think it will also pull ahead where extra 16 ROPS and 20-30gb/s matter.
I think I get those scores in 3dmark11 now at 1418mhz, if not alittle higher.. need to double check., ok 3dmark extreme is 800points higher, but thats minimal.. 1-2fps

I was going to skip this one and looks like I'll just wait for Volta / Navi.

Ieldra
Senior Member
Posts: 3490
Joined: 2007-01-27
Senior Member
Posts: 3490
Joined: 2007-01-27
#5267391 Posted on: 05/05/2016 05:58 PM
I say this again, if pascal carries over the doubled fp-16 that tesla has then it will be interesting, if fp16 shaders take off in gaming it will be a big improvement vs maxwell and gcn.
On the other hand....
If the fp16 capability is enabled in geforce, that will cannibalize sales of both the new maxwell quadro and that of the tesla variants. Deep learning for cheap.
So I'm Doubtful
I say this again, if pascal carries over the doubled fp-16 that tesla has then it will be interesting, if fp16 shaders take off in gaming it will be a big improvement vs maxwell and gcn.
On the other hand....
If the fp16 capability is enabled in geforce, that will cannibalize sales of both the new maxwell quadro and that of the tesla variants. Deep learning for cheap.
So I'm Doubtful
Shadowdane
Senior Member
Posts: 1461
Joined: 2004-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 1461
Joined: 2004-02-14
#5267396 Posted on: 05/05/2016 06:04 PM
half precision (fp-16) would be a bad idea for games though... 16-bit integers just isn't enough for most shaders and would be a big step backward for color output. I for one don't want to go back to the days of 3dfx voodoo and have dithering on my display output!!
Now if we start seeing some games use double precision (fp-64) and Geforce Pascal does keep all those DP Units.. That could be pretty interesting!
half precision (fp-16) would be a bad idea for games though... 16-bit integers just isn't enough for most shaders and would be a big step backward for color output. I for one don't want to go back to the days of 3dfx voodoo and have dithering on my display output!!
Now if we start seeing some games use double precision (fp-64) and Geforce Pascal does keep all those DP Units.. That could be pretty interesting!
XenthorX
Senior Member
Posts: 4525
Joined: 2014-06-17
Senior Member
Posts: 4525
Joined: 2014-06-17
#5267400 Posted on: 05/05/2016 06:15 PM
I tried to drop my CPU core to match the benchmark, and had to go as low as 3Ghz per core. (retail is 3.3Ghz).
Here is my 3dMark11 link:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11224550
980-Ti is 1495Mhz Core, 3950Mhz Memory which is a pretty solid overclock of 37% over retail boost clock of 1090Mhz.
The Graphic score is 26 827.
From the 1080 Benchmark that leaked on ***************, 1080 delivers 27683.
It's therefore a 3% increased (again, i'm not sure of the frequency of their 5820K, i wasn't far from it with 3Ghz) over an highly overclocked 980-Ti.
I tried to drop my CPU core to match the benchmark, and had to go as low as 3Ghz per core. (retail is 3.3Ghz).
Here is my 3dMark11 link:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11224550
980-Ti is 1495Mhz Core, 3950Mhz Memory which is a pretty solid overclock of 37% over retail boost clock of 1090Mhz.
The Graphic score is 26 827.
From the 1080 Benchmark that leaked on ***************, 1080 delivers 27683.
It's therefore a 3% increased (again, i'm not sure of the frequency of their 5820K, i wasn't far from it with 3Ghz) over an highly overclocked 980-Ti.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 14013
Joined: 2004-05-16
I honestly kind of find it amusing that Nvidia might be launching these cards before AMD (I'm assuming tomorrow they won't launch, but I do expect we will be able to get them by June). When basically everyone said Nvidia wouldn't have anything until the end of this year, way after AMD.
I really think AMD showing its cards early hurt them more then helped them. Most people assumed Polaris would replace the Fury X and ended up not buying it (there were tons of threads like this on /r/amd) and now they aren't even replacing the Fury X until Vega.
Just seems like a terrible marketing decision. Imagine if Apple showed the next iPhone off 6+ months before it launched. It would be terrible for current sales. Although I guess it does throw potential buyers off Nvidia products as well. Idk. Just seems bad to me.