G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
NVIDIA GeForce Ampere 3DMark Time Spy Benchmarks show it to be 30 percent faster than RTX 2080 Ti
In the category completely a rumor, news hot the web today that an alleged NVIDIA GeForce "Ampere" GPU made an appearance in 3DMark Time Spy. Not details name wise is noted down so it is assumed to be a GeForce RTX 3080 or RTX 3090.
Rumored specs have been doing rounds for a while now, but this round the 3DMark Time Spy score was dug up by by _rogame (Hardware Leaks), the card listed scored 18257 points, roughly 30 percent faster than the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition. Futuremark SystemInfo does bring a readout of the GPU clock at 1935 MHz with a memory clock at 6000 MHz. That last one is interesting as typical memory actual clocks are listed as 1750 MHz for 14 Gbps GDDR6. Please take the usual disclaimers in mind.
Rogame claims to know with 100 percent certainty that this test was run by an Nvidia employee.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Now Better Visualized with 3D Renders - 06/08/2020 09:32 AM
The bubble busted over the weekend when photos leaked of the alleged GeForce RTX 3080, the new front and back fan design is pretty unique. A Reddit user now has made some 3D renderings of the card, pr...
Here are the PC requirements for F1 2020, AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 06/04/2020 07:34 AM
Codemasters announced the minimum and recommended requirements for its annual F1 game, in this case, F1 2020. The requirements are reasonable for the times and taking into account the visual quality i...
Games will only be on Nvidia GeForce Now after developer opts-in - 05/28/2020 08:12 AM
GeForce NOW is an extension of the PC ecosystem. There is no cost for developers — games just run without difficult porting requirements — helping them reach millions of players who don’t have g...
Rumor: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and 3080 Coming Q3 2020 + Specs - 04/29/2020 02:25 PM
The rumor mill can't stop the chatter about NVIDIA's series 3000 cards, and that will probably stay that way until announced. Today yet another twitter user posted a chart, with names and specificat...
NVIDIA GeForce Now Game Streaming Service Loses Xbox Game Studios and Warner Brothers - 04/21/2020 10:42 AM
Diversification often leaves a market all splintered up, each company holding its own ground and tied exclusively towards a service. Take for example Streaming services like (initially) Netflix, now d...
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 8099
Joined: 2014-09-27
Senior Member
Posts: 8099
Joined: 2014-09-27
#5803378 Posted on: 06/25/2020 08:27 PM
Same thing you accuse AMD's OGL drivers of. If you used standard features of API, it would not run for them while it would for all others.
Yeah, it works for all others. That's the thing. OpenGL allows vendor extensions. They all have them. Products can support them. ATi/AMD has a ton of extensions published, same as NVidia.
Here is the registry. Anybody can contribute.
That's how OpenGL works.
You still haven't answered how you explain your EVIL NVIDIA theory when the AMD OpenGL Linux driver is actually better than NVIDIA's.
This is one thing everyone should understand. That's what raytracing is about.
Sadly, not with current RTX, nor with next ones or RDNA2.
No, it isn't. It's not a replacement for raster techniques, that would be unfathomably stupid. But it can do things that they cannot do.
Again, why do you excuse their obvious incompetence.
Same thing you accuse AMD's OGL drivers of. If you used standard features of API, it would not run for them while it would for all others.
Yeah, it works for all others. That's the thing. OpenGL allows vendor extensions. They all have them. Products can support them. ATi/AMD has a ton of extensions published, same as NVidia.
Here is the registry. Anybody can contribute.
That's how OpenGL works.
You still haven't answered how you explain your EVIL NVIDIA theory when the AMD OpenGL Linux driver is actually better than NVIDIA's.
This is one thing everyone should understand. That's what raytracing is about.
Sadly, not with current RTX, nor with next ones or RDNA2.
No, it isn't. It's not a replacement for raster techniques, that would be unfathomably stupid. But it can do things that they cannot do.
Again, why do you excuse their obvious incompetence.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5803415 Posted on: 06/25/2020 09:34 PM
Same thing you accuse AMD's OGL drivers of. If you used standard features of API, it would not run for them while it would for all others..Yeah, it works for all others. That's the thing. OpenGL allows vendor extensions. They all have them. Products can support them. ATi/AMD has a ton of extensions published, same as NVidia.
Here is the registry. Anybody can contribute.
That's how OpenGL works.
You still haven't answered how you explain your EVIL NVIDIA theory when the AMD OpenGL Linux driver is actually better than NVIDIA's.
Except that given situation with nVidia HW design was that their HW was not capable to even do those things. (That card which saved nVidia was Riva 128. And had 8 out of 32 blend modes HW limit while DX mandated 32. That's a lot in times of fixed function HW in terms of texture manipulation capability.)
This is one thing everyone should understand. That's what raytracing is about.
Sadly, not with current RTX, nor with next ones or RDNA2.
No, it isn't. It's not a replacement for raster techniques, that would be unfathomably stupid. But it can do things that they cannot do.
Again, why do you excuse their obvious incompetence.
Who's incompetence. What's your problem. I am not even mentioning anything that can be read as excuse. It is general raytracing post about image quality. And it does not even say anything about rasterization.
Are you in your mind reading something else than what I am writing?
Same thing you accuse AMD's OGL drivers of. If you used standard features of API, it would not run for them while it would for all others..Yeah, it works for all others. That's the thing. OpenGL allows vendor extensions. They all have them. Products can support them. ATi/AMD has a ton of extensions published, same as NVidia.
Here is the registry. Anybody can contribute.
That's how OpenGL works.
You still haven't answered how you explain your EVIL NVIDIA theory when the AMD OpenGL Linux driver is actually better than NVIDIA's.
Except that given situation with nVidia HW design was that their HW was not capable to even do those things. (That card which saved nVidia was Riva 128. And had 8 out of 32 blend modes HW limit while DX mandated 32. That's a lot in times of fixed function HW in terms of texture manipulation capability.)
This is one thing everyone should understand. That's what raytracing is about.
Sadly, not with current RTX, nor with next ones or RDNA2.
No, it isn't. It's not a replacement for raster techniques, that would be unfathomably stupid. But it can do things that they cannot do.
Again, why do you excuse their obvious incompetence.
Who's incompetence. What's your problem. I am not even mentioning anything that can be read as excuse. It is general raytracing post about image quality. And it does not even say anything about rasterization.
Are you in your mind reading something else than what I am writing?
sykozis
Senior Member
Posts: 22422
Joined: 2008-07-14
Senior Member
Posts: 22422
Joined: 2008-07-14
#5803474 Posted on: 06/26/2020 01:29 AM
- Stop mentioning Intel or nVIdia in your advertising. Ever notice how they never mention AMD?
Apparently you're blind since Intel has mentioned AMD quite a bit over the last couple years.
- Stop turning every damn Intel/nVIdia thread into an AMD circle jerk. AMD fans have become the annoying protester with a megaphone trying to disrupt someone speaking. Yea, your like minded friends will high five you, but everyone else thinks you're being an idiot.
Pot, meet Kettle.....
You and many others regularly attempt to turn every AMD related thread into Intel/NVidia "circle jerks".....
- Stop mentioning Intel or nVIdia in your advertising. Ever notice how they never mention AMD?
Apparently you're blind since Intel has mentioned AMD quite a bit over the last couple years.
- Stop turning every damn Intel/nVIdia thread into an AMD circle jerk. AMD fans have become the annoying protester with a megaphone trying to disrupt someone speaking. Yea, your like minded friends will high five you, but everyone else thinks you're being an idiot.
Pot, meet Kettle.....
You and many others regularly attempt to turn every AMD related thread into Intel/NVidia "circle jerks".....
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 15378
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 15378
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5803623 Posted on: 06/26/2020 12:55 PM
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Same thing you accuse AMD's OGL drivers of. If you used standard features of API, it would not run for them while it would for all others.
This is one thing everyone should understand. That's what raytracing is about.
Sadly, not with current RTX, nor with next ones or RDNA2.
Seen some tech talk about current good practices for raytracing power distribution (AMD).
Basically one AO/GI-ray per pixel, one shadow-ray per pixel. (Showcase had one light source)
And then 1/16th to 1 reflection-ray per pixel.
That's why AMD had that ugly looking all reflective demo. To show that they can do all that's being done via raytracing on every single pixel of screen. (Not just on some particular parts.)
But that was not enough to do proper high quality photorealistic raytracing.