NVIDIA GeForce Ampere 3DMark Time Spy Benchmarks show it to be 30 percent faster than RTX 2080 Ti
In the category completely a rumor, news hot the web today that an alleged NVIDIA GeForce "Ampere" GPU made an appearance in 3DMark Time Spy. Not details name wise is noted down so it is assumed to be a GeForce RTX 3080 or RTX 3090.
Rumored specs have been doing rounds for a while now, but this round the 3DMark Time Spy score was dug up by by _rogame (Hardware Leaks), the card listed scored 18257 points, roughly 30 percent faster than the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition. Futuremark SystemInfo does bring a readout of the GPU clock at 1935 MHz with a memory clock at 6000 MHz. That last one is interesting as typical memory actual clocks are listed as 1750 MHz for 14 Gbps GDDR6. Please take the usual disclaimers in mind.
Rogame claims to know with 100 percent certainty that this test was run by an Nvidia employee.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Now Better Visualized with 3D Renders - 06/08/2020 09:32 AM
The bubble busted over the weekend when photos leaked of the alleged GeForce RTX 3080, the new front and back fan design is pretty unique. A Reddit user now has made some 3D renderings of the card, pr...
Here are the PC requirements for F1 2020, AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 06/04/2020 07:34 AM
Codemasters announced the minimum and recommended requirements for its annual F1 game, in this case, F1 2020. The requirements are reasonable for the times and taking into account the visual quality i...
Games will only be on Nvidia GeForce Now after developer opts-in - 05/28/2020 08:12 AM
GeForce NOW is an extension of the PC ecosystem. There is no cost for developers — games just run without difficult porting requirements — helping them reach millions of players who don’t have g...
Rumor: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and 3080 Coming Q3 2020 + Specs - 04/29/2020 02:25 PM
The rumor mill can't stop the chatter about NVIDIA's series 3000 cards, and that will probably stay that way until announced. Today yet another twitter user posted a chart, with names and specificat...
NVIDIA GeForce Now Game Streaming Service Loses Xbox Game Studios and Warner Brothers - 04/21/2020 10:42 AM
Diversification often leaves a market all splintered up, each company holding its own ground and tied exclusively towards a service. Take for example Streaming services like (initially) Netflix, now d...
Senior Member
Posts: 9786
Joined: 2008-01-06
How about you go make a thread about AMD's shitty marketing decisions and how to improve them instead of doing that here?
oh ffs... you got me to bite.
You know what would help AMD's image in the eyes of consumers?
- Stop making huge performance claims that upon release fall far short.
- Stop mentioning Intel or nVIdia in your advertising. Ever notice how they never mention AMD?
- Stop promoting deceiving news articles with headlines saying how they're crushing Intel's sales, etc ... when it turns out those numbers came from a very AMD focused retailer in germany. Such articles are flat out lies and people hate being lied to.
And most importantly....
- Stop turning every damn Intel/nVIdia thread into an AMD circle jerk. AMD fans have become the annoying protester with a megaphone trying to disrupt someone speaking. Yea, your like minded friends will high five you, but everyone else thinks you're being an idiot.
I agree with everything you said about AMD needing to change and I agree on every point you made.
Trust me I am no AMD fanboy, I want them to do well so it benefits all of us and in the end we get better products at better prices. No one likes monopolies except the companies and run them.
Why wouldn't anyone want AMD to do to Nvidia what AMD done to Intel? Hope is all we have after being let down so many times before and even that is wearing thin.
EDIT: Oh and the job thing was a joke.... maybe you didn't get it.....
Senior Member
Posts: 15355
Joined: 2018-03-21
Your delusion is on full display here.
OpenGL is preferred over vulkan in a number of cases because vulkan is far more restrictive in capability.
ATI was going just fine without AMD swooping in because they wanted to be an every chip vendor and screwing the engineering division and losing half its software division to IBM.
PS: If AMD had have agreed to jensens terms on a merger, they wouldn't have had a decade of obscure utility due to poor chip design.
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
How about you go make a thread about AMD's shitty marketing decisions and how to improve them instead of doing that here?
oh ffs... you got me to bite.
You know what would help AMD's image in the eyes of consumers?
- Stop making huge performance claims that upon release fall far short.
- Stop mentioning Intel or nVIdia in your advertising. Ever notice how they never mention AMD?
- Stop promoting deceiving news articles with headlines saying how they're crushing Intel's sales, etc ... when it turns out those numbers came from a very AMD focused retailer in germany. Such articles are flat out lies and people hate being lied to.
And most importantly....
- Stop turning every damn Intel/nVIdia thread into an AMD circle jerk. AMD fans have become the annoying protester with a megaphone trying to disrupt someone speaking. Yea, your like minded friends will high five you, but everyone else thinks you're being an idiot.
ad 1st point) AMD have not done that with RDNA and that was big improvement on so many levels in comparison to GCN, most people here can't even comprehend.
ad 2nd point) https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/cinebenchmore-coresmore-threads-it-all-doesnt-matter-says-intel.html (Not 1st and not last.)
ad 3rd) It's not only retailer. And it is not like this shop refuses to sell intel or does not have them available. Their sales data are valid as any other because they do not play favorites.
ad 4) Who prevented you or anyone other from speaking here?
- - - -
Only thing I see is that you got yourself triggered by someone's personal experience and a joke.
And I would completely ignore it if it was not for point 1 and 3 not applying to current situation. Plus 2 and 4 being false.
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Didn't they have revenue of $2B a year ($500M per quarter) while having $100M loss per quarter at that time? in Q1 2006 they made more marketing announcement than they did in entire year before, just to keep their stock price from crushing fast. So they were already about to sell.
Jensen, who committed fraud to keep nVidia afloat in bad times. And while it enabled him to get very powerful GPU out of the house, it was far from good one in terms of industry standard. And then he went around and got game developers to bend and not follow industry standard, so games would actually run on those cards.
That resulted in simple thing, death of most of other GPU manufacturers, who did follow standard and who could not benefit from implementing given features.
(Investing transistors into now useless features. And being beaten by nVidia who invested transistors into doubling performance of those few they had.)
Jensen Huang even admitted it while painting himself as an hero. He was daring, he did bet all he had (and even what he did not have) and won. But he is not someone I would trust. And without trust, there is no cooperation.
All those people who complain about not GPU competition and praise nVidia at same time...
Senior Member
Posts: 5536
Joined: 2017-11-23
Imo it is a gimmick in line with physx - even in control which everyone says is the posterchild for rtx, it only looks marginally better than screenspace reflections, and at an absurd performance hit. Dlss is just thrash, pure and simple... no one buys a 4k screen to play at sub 4k image quality. Native res or downsampling, anything else is fail.