AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review
Nvidia G-Sync could be ASUS exclusive for a while
Nvidia's G-SYNC is likely going to be exclusive to ASUS until late 2014. At least that what is speculated. G-Sync is both a software and a hardware solution that will solve screen tearing and stuttering. A daughter hardware board is placed into a G-Sync enabled monitor which will do something very interesting. It is now reported that ASUS signed an exclusive deal with Nvidia. Something I would not be happy about.
Admittedly I doubt the claim Swedish website sweclockers makes by reporting that the first wave G-Sync will be introduced in monitors with a 120 to 144 Hz refresh rate. The first screen was already announced by ASUS, which is the VG248QE with a price tag of roughly 300 EUR (which might go upwards now).
This means that other manufacturers will have to wait until Q3/Q4 of 2013 before they can integrate it into their monitors. In the end if this information is right it will be a bad deal for the consumers as exclusivity drives prices upwards, which is exactly something you do not want to happen with new technology. If all this is true, then this is a very poor decision that has been made. It would irritate the other manufacturers like BenQ, Philips and Viewsonic, and next to that the exclusivity will halt sales and adoption rate for sure as people want diversity and not the option of just one monitor brand. So let's hope this was just a false rumor. More info on G-Sync can be found here.
ASUS Announces Adoption of NVIDIA G-SYNC Technology - 10/21/2013 10:06 AM
ASUS is excited to announce that it will adopt NVIDIA G-SYNC technology into its next generation monitor lineup. NVIDIA G-SYNC, a significant innovation in display technology, provides an excellent ga...
NVIDIA G-Sync explained (article) - 10/21/2013 10:06 AM
On Friday NVIDIA announced G-Sync, and considering the little details available out there I wanted to write a quick follow-up on this new technology, as it really is a big announcement - a really big ...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX Holiday game bundle announced - 10/18/2013 01:28 PM
VIDIA has a proud heritage on the PC platform – ‘The Way It’s Meant To Be Played’ is synonymous with PC gamers around the globe. Some of this season’s...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX Battlebox Program for 4K Gaming - 10/01/2013 04:23 PM
NVIDIA is pleased to announce we’re working with system builders around EMEAI to help introduce a new breed of elite gaming PCs, called the GeForce GTX Battlebox. Designed to deliver the fa...
NVIDIA GeForce 320.49 now WHQL Certified Drivers - 07/02/2013 07:48 AM
We've been serving the Beta driver for a few days already, but the download of NVIDIA GeForce 320.49 has now been WHQL Certified. Download the GeForce 320.49 WHQL Driver as released by NVIDIA. Thi...
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 12778
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 12778
Joined: 2003-05-24
#4693056 Posted on: 11/05/2013 01:23 AM
Cause alot of people use vsync cause they dont care to see tearing, and vsync i has alot of draw backs. and g sync if it does what says has none of the draw backs. IF it works as they state they will go to bank on this cause Vsync needs to be replaced with somthing better
And alot people dont do sli to make 120hz monitors worth the money
I am at Radeon side about 6years, cos I dont like NV marketing and politics, started with physx. This is great innovation by NV, but AMD have great new innovations too, Mantle, true sound, and is cheaper, so my Q is: why do you need G-sync if you play on 2xAMDs games at 100hz/100 fps constatnt? or perhaps 120hz/120fps constant 
I stick on AMD side next 1-2 years absolutely, and waiting for 2x290x in Slovakia, my favorit is Gygabite with their great 3xfans, I cant waaaait, where are the cards?
I stick on AMD side next 1-2 years absolutely, and waiting for 2x290x in Slovakia, my favorit is Gygabite with their great 3xfans, I cant waaaait, where are the cards? Cause alot of people use vsync cause they dont care to see tearing, and vsync i has alot of draw backs. and g sync if it does what says has none of the draw backs. IF it works as they state they will go to bank on this cause Vsync needs to be replaced with somthing better
And alot people dont do sli to make 120hz monitors worth the money
Sharky
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Joined: 2013-01-07
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Joined: 2013-01-07
#4693061 Posted on: 11/05/2013 01:24 AM
Looking forward to G-sync, but I'd more than likely get one from BenQ when I upgrade end of the year. Smooth gaming even with frame drops and being stutter free sounds awesome.
Looking forward to G-sync, but I'd more than likely get one from BenQ when I upgrade end of the year. Smooth gaming even with frame drops and being stutter free sounds awesome.
Kaerar
Senior Member
Posts: 366
Joined: 2003-10-26
Senior Member
Posts: 366
Joined: 2003-10-26
#4693232 Posted on: 11/05/2013 06:42 AM
Not if it's limited to Asus you won't
Looking forward to G-sync, but I'd more than likely get one from BenQ when I upgrade end of the year. Smooth gaming even with frame drops and being stutter free sounds awesome.
Not if it's limited to Asus you won't
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2013-11-03
I am at Radeon side about 6years, cos I dont like NV marketing and politics, started with physx. This is great innovation by NV, but AMD have great new innovations too, Mantle, true sound, and is cheaper, so my Q is: why do you need G-sync if you play on 2xAMDs games at 100hz/100 fps constatnt? or perhaps 120hz/120fps constant