Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Corsair Void RGB Elite Wireless Headset review
Team Group PD400 Portable SSD review
AMD Athlon 3000G review
Team Group T-Force Delta Max 1 TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2019
ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore review
Toshiba RC500 500GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Promo: URcdkey Black Friday Windows 10 Pro for $12
Nvidia DGX-1 With Tesla V100 Spotted in GeekBench With Staggering Numbers
Back in May Nvidia announced its Testla Volta V100 processor with Tensor architecture. The companies TSMC’s 12nm finfet process bakes graphics processor has 5120 shader processors activated out of a total of 5376 cores. Scores surfaced in geekbench, and they are impressive.
So a fully enabled GV100 GPU actually consists of six GPCs, 84 Volta SMs, 42 TPCs (each including two SMs), and eight 512-bit memory controllers (4096 bits total). Each SM has 64 FP32 Cores, 64 INT32 Cores, 32 FP64 Cores, and 8 new Tensor Cores. Each SM also includes four texture units.
With 84 SMs, a full GV100 GPU thus has a total of 5376 FP32 cores, 5376 INT32 cores, 2688 FP64 cores, 672 Tensor Cores, and 336 texture units. Each memory controller is attached to 768 KB of L2 cache, and each HBM2 DRAM stack is controlled by a pair of memory controllers. The full GV100 GPU includes a total of 6144 KB of L2 cache. The figure in above table shows a full GV100 GPU with 84 SMs (different products can use different configurations of GV100). The Tesla V100 accelerator uses 80 SMs.
Now then, the Nvidia DGX-1 unit with Tesla V100 Spotted in GeekBench has 5,120 shader processors. For the record, a DGX-1 setup currently costs roughlt 129K and houses eight Tesla V100 cards, two Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 processors, 512GB DDR4, four 1.92TB SSDs in RAID 0 and a power supply of more than three kilowatt. So let's call it what it is, a super computer in a box.
An entry was spotted in Geekbench 4, both with OpenCL and CUDA APIs. Where Tesla P100 systems scores up-to 320,000 points, the DGX-1 reached 481,504 points at OpenCL and 746,537 points using the CUDA API. The numbers are just staggering.
Via: hardware.info, wccftech
Nvidia drops 3 and 4-way SLI mode starting with GeForce 1000 series - 06/09/2016 04:34 PM
We already shared a thing or two on this topic in the Pascal GPU reviews. Initially Nvidia would allow 3 and 4-way SLI mode with a enthusiast driver key. As it seems though, Nvidia is abandoning that ...
NVIDIA Demos Zero Latency Display Running at 1700Hz - 04/08/2016 07:34 AM
Nvidia is demonstrating a display that holds a true refresh-rate of 1700Hz. It is a prototype called zero latency display and it can display imagery stable even when shaking the screen, handy for VR....
Nvidia demos prototype lightfield VR glasses - 01/25/2016 03:32 PM
At the Virtual Reality exhibit in LA Nvidia is showing a prototype of their vr-glasses in development based on lightfield technology. The company is working together with Stanford university on this p...
Nvidia drops Samsung and uses TSMC for Pascal - 09/17/2015 07:53 AM
So we already mentioned would very likely be made on TSMC 16nm FiNFET. The target release date for this GPU is 2016. The product would be released as GP100 and will be the succesor to the GM200 series...
Nvidia Disables Overclocking for Series 900 Mobile GPUs - 02/12/2015 05:53 PM
Nvidia once again managed to irritate a lot of people, this time the latest driver update disables overclocking for the mobile Series 900. Until recently these parts could be overclocked....
Netherwind
Senior Member
Posts: 6924
Joined: 2009-11-13
Senior Member
Posts: 6924
Joined: 2009-11-13
#5472960 Posted on: 09/18/2017 09:31 AM
Great chip, but very unlikely to see a gaming card based on it anytime soon.
It's simply way too expensive to manufacture. A Volta gaming card would be 1600 $ minimum.
Stick to your 1070, 1080 and 1080Ti or whatever else you (we) have, because those are the only toys to play with until probably late 2018
We still need something to run those 4K/120Hz monitors that are being released
A 1080Ti (or even two) simply won't cut it.
Great chip, but very unlikely to see a gaming card based on it anytime soon.
It's simply way too expensive to manufacture. A Volta gaming card would be 1600 $ minimum.
Stick to your 1070, 1080 and 1080Ti or whatever else you (we) have, because those are the only toys to play with until probably late 2018
We still need something to run those 4K/120Hz monitors that are being released
A 1080Ti (or even two) simply won't cut it.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 3202
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 3202
Joined: 2008-09-07
#5472967 Posted on: 09/18/2017 09:46 AM
I want OLED, HDR, HLG, Dolby-Vision and 0 latency - no point buying a new monitor unless I got that on board. No point at all.
Kinda tired of incremental upgrades - I want it all, and am willing to wait patiently for it.
This whole round of CPU and GPU that's been going on since...Sandybridge? hasn't really had much of difference. I'm liking the future and I welcome it, but until then, this is mostly posturing by CPU and GPU manufacturers.
Except for this.
This looks like things are changing, but the cost is the big no-no for me, and the lack of OLED - yet teevee OLED's drop like 60% in the first year, which is amazing (LG B7 range is a steal right now!) and hopefully will push more companies to offer smaller panels for desktop usage, the demand is there for a 24-27 inch OLED desktop 4K HDR monitor, just waiting for it to happen...
We still need something to run those 4K/120Hz monitors that are being released A 1080Ti (or even two) simply won't cut it.
A 1080Ti (or even two) simply won't cut it.I want OLED, HDR, HLG, Dolby-Vision and 0 latency - no point buying a new monitor unless I got that on board. No point at all.
Kinda tired of incremental upgrades - I want it all, and am willing to wait patiently for it.
This whole round of CPU and GPU that's been going on since...Sandybridge? hasn't really had much of difference. I'm liking the future and I welcome it, but until then, this is mostly posturing by CPU and GPU manufacturers.
Except for this.
This looks like things are changing, but the cost is the big no-no for me, and the lack of OLED - yet teevee OLED's drop like 60% in the first year, which is amazing (LG B7 range is a steal right now!) and hopefully will push more companies to offer smaller panels for desktop usage, the demand is there for a 24-27 inch OLED desktop 4K HDR monitor, just waiting for it to happen...
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 916
Joined: 2013-02-22
Senior Member
Posts: 916
Joined: 2013-02-22
#5472974 Posted on: 09/18/2017 11:23 AM
It's just a matter of time before a gaming variant of this comes out with maybe gddr5x/6 or 2 stacks of hbm2 And without the tensor core stuff
It's just a matter of time before a gaming variant of this comes out with maybe gddr5x/6 or 2 stacks of hbm2 And without the tensor core stuff
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1688
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1688
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5472975 Posted on: 09/18/2017 11:28 AM
Great chip, but very unlikely to see a gaming card based on it anytime soon.
It's simply way too expensive to manufacture. A Volta gaming card would be 1600 $ minimum.
Stick to your 1070, 1080 and 1080Ti or whatever else you (we) have, because those are the only toys to play with until probably late 2018
Yeah. Since Vega can only compete with Pascal up to 1080 and can't even challenge 1080Ti, unless there's some very special case, Nvidia folks ought not to be in any hurry and pressure to replace the Pascal consumer line. They can take their time to ponder their options and choose the best approach for both themselves (financially) and the consumers (since GPUs have always been showing generational progress, unlike CPUs).
Great chip, but very unlikely to see a gaming card based on it anytime soon.
It's simply way too expensive to manufacture. A Volta gaming card would be 1600 $ minimum.
Stick to your 1070, 1080 and 1080Ti or whatever else you (we) have, because those are the only toys to play with until probably late 2018
Yeah. Since Vega can only compete with Pascal up to 1080 and can't even challenge 1080Ti, unless there's some very special case, Nvidia folks ought not to be in any hurry and pressure to replace the Pascal consumer line. They can take their time to ponder their options and choose the best approach for both themselves (financially) and the consumers (since GPUs have always been showing generational progress, unlike CPUs).
pharma
Senior Member
Posts: 1108
Joined: 2003-09-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1108
Joined: 2003-09-10
#5472979 Posted on: 09/18/2017 11:55 AM
Impressive. Things to take away is even if a system has multiples GPUs, Geekbench benchmark is using only one GPU. So each line in the table is using one GPU even though it might have multiple GPU's inside, i.e., one V100 vs one P100.
Currently the highest RX Vega entry in Geekbench 4 compute OpenCL result is 204,593.
For detail on each table entry: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/compute?dir=desc&sort=score
Impressive. Things to take away is even if a system has multiples GPUs, Geekbench benchmark is using only one GPU. So each line in the table is using one GPU even though it might have multiple GPU's inside, i.e., one V100 vs one P100.
Currently the highest RX Vega entry in Geekbench 4 compute OpenCL result is 204,593.
For detail on each table entry: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/compute?dir=desc&sort=score
allesclar
Senior Member
Posts: 5632
Joined: 2004-09-04
Senior Member
Posts: 5632
Joined: 2004-09-04
#5472982 Posted on: 09/18/2017 12:06 PM
impressive but can it fold
impressive but can it fold
The Edge
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: 2012-05-02
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: 2012-05-02
#5473018 Posted on: 09/18/2017 01:55 PM
I want OLED, HDR, HLG, Dolby-Vision and 0 latency - no point buying a new monitor unless I got that on board. No point at all.
Kinda tired of incremental upgrades - I want it all, and am willing to wait patiently for it.
This whole round of CPU and GPU that's been going on since...Sandybridge? hasn't really had much of difference. I'm liking the future and I welcome it, but until then, this is mostly posturing by CPU and GPU manufacturers.
Except for this.
This looks like things are changing, but the cost is the big no-no for me, and the lack of OLED - yet teevee OLED's drop like 60% in the first year, which is amazing (LG B7 range is a steal right now!) and hopefully will push more companies to offer smaller panels for desktop usage, the demand is there for a 24-27 inch OLED desktop 4K HDR monitor, just waiting for it to happen...
Doubt we will see OLED in PC monitors anytime soon. The static desktop image would destroy the panel in a few months. Especially something like start panel...
I want OLED, HDR, HLG, Dolby-Vision and 0 latency - no point buying a new monitor unless I got that on board. No point at all.
Kinda tired of incremental upgrades - I want it all, and am willing to wait patiently for it.
This whole round of CPU and GPU that's been going on since...Sandybridge? hasn't really had much of difference. I'm liking the future and I welcome it, but until then, this is mostly posturing by CPU and GPU manufacturers.
Except for this.
This looks like things are changing, but the cost is the big no-no for me, and the lack of OLED - yet teevee OLED's drop like 60% in the first year, which is amazing (LG B7 range is a steal right now!) and hopefully will push more companies to offer smaller panels for desktop usage, the demand is there for a 24-27 inch OLED desktop 4K HDR monitor, just waiting for it to happen...
Doubt we will see OLED in PC monitors anytime soon. The static desktop image would destroy the panel in a few months. Especially something like start panel...
rm082e
Senior Member
Posts: 521
Joined: 2014-12-11
Senior Member
Posts: 521
Joined: 2014-12-11
#5473033 Posted on: 09/18/2017 03:03 PM
Glad to hear there is at least some indication the next step will be another big one. I'm hoping I can replace my 970 sli with a single card that's more powerful, for relatively cheap ($200-$250).
Glad to hear there is at least some indication the next step will be another big one. I'm hoping I can replace my 970 sli with a single card that's more powerful, for relatively cheap ($200-$250).
baasgene
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: 2015-07-02
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: 2015-07-02
#5473037 Posted on: 09/18/2017 03:08 PM
True unfortunately, it's rather easy to preserve Oled though I am using a LG E6 as a desktop and have no burn in. The secret is to make it so that your screen saver comes on within 3 minutes, and don't use the thing for browsing marathons. Even if you let a static image stay on for an hour or so just use the tv normally and the image retention goes away, but obviously permanent damage will start to set in after many multiple hours.
But most standard human beings probably won't give a **** and just let the thing burn and then they complain afterwards. I don't see OLED as a viable monitor ever because of that.
Doubt we will see OLED in PC monitors anytime soon. The static desktop image would destroy the panel in a few months. Especially something like start panel...
True unfortunately, it's rather easy to preserve Oled though I am using a LG E6 as a desktop and have no burn in. The secret is to make it so that your screen saver comes on within 3 minutes, and don't use the thing for browsing marathons. Even if you let a static image stay on for an hour or so just use the tv normally and the image retention goes away, but obviously permanent damage will start to set in after many multiple hours.
But most standard human beings probably won't give a **** and just let the thing burn and then they complain afterwards. I don't see OLED as a viable monitor ever because of that.
Ryu5uzaku
Senior Member
Posts: 6775
Joined: 2006-09-24
Senior Member
Posts: 6775
Joined: 2006-09-24
#5473052 Posted on: 09/18/2017 03:52 PM
So is that the score of the whole system DGX-1? I am confused. I have no clue what those other system stats are. Of course this should be faster tho.
So is that the score of the whole system DGX-1? I am confused. I have no clue what those other system stats are. Of course this should be faster tho.
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9744
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 9744
Joined: 2003-05-24
#5473062 Posted on: 09/18/2017 04:22 PM
seeing as we been wating 10+ years for it i sure it will 10+ before it happens, if they dont find some other tech that better in that time that actual see the light of day to replaced led/lcd, I will setter for seeing 32/40" oled TV i dont use my TV as PC moniotr often, I only switch to it when I want to play one my games on 32" instead of 23", next TV will be 40" which biggest i manage so long as its got low profiles frame., current samsung 40" are 2" wider then them LNA32550A.
As for V100 that is a righteous score, When and IF the next 11xx series comes out and if based on this? 1160 or what ever it called, would be the card i get and sit on till it dies like did with my 9800GT
1080p/1440p done with ease keeping 60fps on high, with 25% or more power to spare would be ideal card to me 9800gt fit the right up till it died, atlest for 1080p this probably wishful thinking though, 1440p monitor will be next monitor 4k monitor not happening gpu are not ready, and TV are pretty much 1080p or 4k so when I get new tv it will be 4k.
Doubt we will see OLED in PC monitors anytime soon. The static desktop image would destroy the panel in a few months. Especially something like start panel...
seeing as we been wating 10+ years for it i sure it will 10+ before it happens, if they dont find some other tech that better in that time that actual see the light of day to replaced led/lcd, I will setter for seeing 32/40" oled TV i dont use my TV as PC moniotr often, I only switch to it when I want to play one my games on 32" instead of 23", next TV will be 40" which biggest i manage so long as its got low profiles frame., current samsung 40" are 2" wider then them LNA32550A.
As for V100 that is a righteous score, When and IF the next 11xx series comes out and if based on this? 1160 or what ever it called, would be the card i get and sit on till it dies like did with my 9800GT
1080p/1440p done with ease keeping 60fps on high, with 25% or more power to spare would be ideal card to me 9800gt fit the right up till it died, atlest for 1080p this probably wishful thinking though, 1440p monitor will be next monitor 4k monitor not happening gpu are not ready, and TV are pretty much 1080p or 4k so when I get new tv it will be 4k.
Ricepudding
Senior Member
Posts: 492
Joined: 2017-02-17
Senior Member
Posts: 492
Joined: 2017-02-17
#5473071 Posted on: 09/18/2017 04:59 PM
seeing as we been wating 10+ years for it i sure it will 10+ before it happens, if they dont find some other tech that better in that time that actual see the light of day to replaced led/lcd, I will setter for seeing 32/40" oled TV i dont use my TV as PC moniotr often, I only switch to it when I want to play one my games on 32" instead of 23", next TV will be 40" which biggest i manage so long as its got low profiles frame., current samsung 40" are 2" wider then them LNA32550A.
As for V100 that is a righteous score, When and IF the next 11xx series comes out and if based on this? 1160 or what ever it called, would be the card i get and sit on till it dies like did with my 9800GT
1080p/1440p done with ease keeping 60fps on high, with 25% or more power to spare would be ideal card to me 9800gt fit the right up till it died, atlest for 1080p this probably wishful thinking though, 1440p monitor will be next monitor 4k monitor not happening gpu are not ready, and TV are pretty much 1080p or 4k so when I get new tv it will be 4k.
OLED still has some teething issues too with it burning out a lot faster than say LCD and LED, so yeah might be awhile... i'm quite intent with IPS back bleeding has gone down a lot in recent years which is nice.
But yeah, this are good results considering this isn't even the "full" v100 but a slightly cut down version. we might see the 1160 be as strong as the 1080 depending on how they cut down the cards... with the 1170 being as strong as the 1080ti and the 1180 being the new king chip (around 20-30% stronger than the current 1080ti) (guessing we would have to wait another 9-12 months for the 1180ti). Might be able to finally replace my 980ti with a worthwhile upgrade with the 1180
True unfortunately, it's rather easy to preserve Oled though I am using a LG E6 as a desktop and have no burn in. The secret is to make it so that your screen saver comes on within 3 minutes, and don't use the thing for browsing marathons. Even if you let a static image stay on for an hour or so just use the tv normally and the image retention goes away, but obviously permanent damage will start to set in after many multiple hours.
But most standard human beings probably won't give a **** and just let the thing burn and then they complain afterwards. I don't see OLED as a viable monitor ever because of that.
Until they fix this if it can be fixed i don't see myself going OLED, i can game on my pc for many hours at a time, so having it burn out due to that would just be a huge waste of money on my part... might be fine for general use or whatever but i don't think it is good for anyone currently who spends a good 4-6 hours straight a day on the PC with this thing being on the whole time. can see it burning out quite quickly... be interesting to know if this issue can be fixed or if this is just a fault in design and we should be waiting for new technology to replace it
seeing as we been wating 10+ years for it i sure it will 10+ before it happens, if they dont find some other tech that better in that time that actual see the light of day to replaced led/lcd, I will setter for seeing 32/40" oled TV i dont use my TV as PC moniotr often, I only switch to it when I want to play one my games on 32" instead of 23", next TV will be 40" which biggest i manage so long as its got low profiles frame., current samsung 40" are 2" wider then them LNA32550A.
As for V100 that is a righteous score, When and IF the next 11xx series comes out and if based on this? 1160 or what ever it called, would be the card i get and sit on till it dies like did with my 9800GT
1080p/1440p done with ease keeping 60fps on high, with 25% or more power to spare would be ideal card to me 9800gt fit the right up till it died, atlest for 1080p this probably wishful thinking though, 1440p monitor will be next monitor 4k monitor not happening gpu are not ready, and TV are pretty much 1080p or 4k so when I get new tv it will be 4k.
OLED still has some teething issues too with it burning out a lot faster than say LCD and LED, so yeah might be awhile... i'm quite intent with IPS back bleeding has gone down a lot in recent years which is nice.
But yeah, this are good results considering this isn't even the "full" v100 but a slightly cut down version. we might see the 1160 be as strong as the 1080 depending on how they cut down the cards... with the 1170 being as strong as the 1080ti and the 1180 being the new king chip (around 20-30% stronger than the current 1080ti) (guessing we would have to wait another 9-12 months for the 1180ti). Might be able to finally replace my 980ti with a worthwhile upgrade with the 1180
True unfortunately, it's rather easy to preserve Oled though I am using a LG E6 as a desktop and have no burn in. The secret is to make it so that your screen saver comes on within 3 minutes, and don't use the thing for browsing marathons. Even if you let a static image stay on for an hour or so just use the tv normally and the image retention goes away, but obviously permanent damage will start to set in after many multiple hours.
But most standard human beings probably won't give a **** and just let the thing burn and then they complain afterwards. I don't see OLED as a viable monitor ever because of that.
Until they fix this if it can be fixed i don't see myself going OLED, i can game on my pc for many hours at a time, so having it burn out due to that would just be a huge waste of money on my part... might be fine for general use or whatever but i don't think it is good for anyone currently who spends a good 4-6 hours straight a day on the PC with this thing being on the whole time. can see it burning out quite quickly... be interesting to know if this issue can be fixed or if this is just a fault in design and we should be waiting for new technology to replace it
Amx85
Senior Member
Posts: 331
Joined: 2016-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 331
Joined: 2016-09-28
#5473093 Posted on: 09/18/2017 05:51 PM
sorry but i don´t believe on Geekbench numbers, they can put any number in its page remenber EPYC numbers and Iphone numbers, so afar from reallity, sorry Geekbench your maketing does´nt impress me
grettings
sorry but i don´t believe on Geekbench numbers, they can put any number in its page remenber EPYC numbers and Iphone numbers, so afar from reallity, sorry Geekbench your maketing does´nt impress me
grettings
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9744
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 9744
Joined: 2003-05-24
#5473094 Posted on: 09/18/2017 05:54 PM
I dont know about that maybe for Monitors ? but majority of ALL 4k/HD tv that use IPS have some nasty back bleeding, and some these have some truely horrible contrast ratios. I still prefer TN over IPS and I rather have VA over IPS. some the VA panels samsung uses have some truely nice blacks almost void of any clouding can say same of the IPS panels sony uses in some of the 4k tvs
lower Response times are must the 2ms on my monitor is not good enough and 5ms my HDTV has is really noticeable over my 2ms monitor. and backbleeding are huge no no's to me which ISP still seem to suffer from more then other panels. back bleeding and high response times run ruin the better colors they have as far as concerned.
we can hope the 1160 so numbers close to 1070/1080, special if manage to reduce the power consumption too
'm quite intent with IPS back bleeding has gone down a lot in recent years which is nice.
I dont know about that maybe for Monitors ? but majority of ALL 4k/HD tv that use IPS have some nasty back bleeding, and some these have some truely horrible contrast ratios. I still prefer TN over IPS and I rather have VA over IPS. some the VA panels samsung uses have some truely nice blacks almost void of any clouding can say same of the IPS panels sony uses in some of the 4k tvs
lower Response times are must the 2ms on my monitor is not good enough and 5ms my HDTV has is really noticeable over my 2ms monitor. and backbleeding are huge no no's to me which ISP still seem to suffer from more then other panels. back bleeding and high response times run ruin the better colors they have as far as concerned.
we can hope the 1160 so numbers close to 1070/1080, special if manage to reduce the power consumption too
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 688
Joined: 2008-07-16
Great chip, but very unlikely to see a gaming card based on it anytime soon.
It's simply way too expensive to manufacture. A Volta gaming card would be 1600 $ minimum.
Stick to your 1070, 1080 and 1080Ti or whatever else you (we) have, because those are the only toys to play with until probably late 2018