Borderlands 3: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Swiftech H240 X3 AIO review
Promo: URCDKey Autumn Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Corsair HS35 Stereo Gaming Headset Review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming X review
Gears of War 5: PC graphics performance benchmark review
XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT THICC II Ultra review
ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Formula review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Gaming X review
NEC EA244UHD 23.8" has 4k IPS Panel
NEC announced the release of a new 23.8" sized screen that sits in their EA series. Under SKU code EA244UHD the product offers a 4k 3840 x 2160 resolution and an AH-IPS panel. The screen looks to be using a very similar panel to the Dell UP2414Q which is already available. It offers a wide colour gamut with 99.3% Adobe RGB coverage, 94.8% NTSC and 100% sRGB thanks to it's GB-r-LED backlight system.
In other specs it also offers a 6ms G2G response time, 1000:1 contrast ratio, 350 cd/m2 brightness and 178/178 viewing angles. The panel offers a 1.07b colour depth with a 4.3 trillion colour palette.
- 4K resolution (3840 x 2160) offers a massive amount desktop space, four times full HD resolution
- LED backlight technology provides for industry-leading low power consumption and less hazardous materials
- Fully adjustable quick-release stand, including height-adjust (130mm), pivot, tilt and swivel capabilities, adds flexibility and comfort to your viewing preferences
- Full connectivity, including DisplayPort, HDMI and DVI-D inputs
- Touch-sensitive OSD controls are integrated into the bezel, making display adjustments easier than ever
- Human sensor and ambient light sensor automatically detect your work conditions to determine the proper display brightness, thereby conserving power
- ECO Mode allows for up to 56% more power conservation (vs. typical power settings), reducing your energy costs
There are DisplayPort (x2), HDMI, HDMI/MHL, DVI-D Single Link (x2) video connections available and also a USB 3.0 hub (1 up/ 3 down). The stand offers a full range of tilt, height, swivel and rotate adjustments. There is Picture By Picture provided as well, integrated speakers, an ambient light sensor, human motion sensor, touch sensitive OSD control buttons.
The screen is listed on NEC's US website at a retail price of $1349 USD, and on the UK site at £1295 GBP (inc VAT).
Dictator93
Senior Member
Posts: 276
Joined: 2009-03-25
Senior Member
Posts: 276
Joined: 2009-03-25
#4868741 Posted on: 07/09/2014 10:36 AM
Can't you adjust windows ICON scaling for 200%?
I have seen a few 4K Monitors mostly 28inch + and the Scaling with Windows sucks so how will it work at 23-24 inches seems kinda crazy and broken to me.
Can't you adjust windows ICON scaling for 200%?
riardon
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2014-05-03
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2014-05-03
#4868750 Posted on: 07/09/2014 10:54 AM
Why they make so ugly monitors? They manage to make nice performance but they fail miserably in design. I see many monitors even if they sell as premium they look terrible like its 20 years old or smth. Really ugly.
Why they make so ugly monitors? They manage to make nice performance but they fail miserably in design. I see many monitors even if they sell as premium they look terrible like its 20 years old or smth. Really ugly.
Ven0m
Senior Member
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2005-08-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2005-08-12
#4868754 Posted on: 07/09/2014 11:03 AM
Scaling works pretty much fine in most apps that I tried. Also in this case you're going for 200% scaling, so even legacy apps will look ok as you'd get each pixel upscaled to 2x2 square, so there will be no blur.
I have seen a few 4K Monitors mostly 28inch + and the Scaling with Windows sucks so how will it work at 23-24 inches seems kinda crazy and broken to me.
Scaling works pretty much fine in most apps that I tried. Also in this case you're going for 200% scaling, so even legacy apps will look ok as you'd get each pixel upscaled to 2x2 square, so there will be no blur.
Lane
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
#4868862 Posted on: 07/09/2014 01:13 PM
Actually, the problem is not windows but only some particulary old appliccations who have not been updated and dont have an UI done for thoses resolution / dont scale well. ( winzip, winrar, well this type of thing .)
Professionally wise it is not much a problem as software are easely scalable and with modifiable CUI ( Custom User Interface for CAD etc )..
Now i fear a little beat what you gain on place is taked back by the scaling needed on a 24" monitor size. But maybe it look really good in term of sharpness.
But yes they will need some time for see everyone really rethink a bit their softwares UI for 4K resolution.
I have seen a few 4K Monitors mostly 28inch + and the Scaling with Windows sucks so how will it work at 23-24 inches seems kinda crazy and broken to me.
Actually, the problem is not windows but only some particulary old appliccations who have not been updated and dont have an UI done for thoses resolution / dont scale well. ( winzip, winrar, well this type of thing .)
Professionally wise it is not much a problem as software are easely scalable and with modifiable CUI ( Custom User Interface for CAD etc )..
Now i fear a little beat what you gain on place is taked back by the scaling needed on a 24" monitor size. But maybe it look really good in term of sharpness.
But yes they will need some time for see everyone really rethink a bit their softwares UI for 4K resolution.
Anarion
Senior Member
Posts: 13503
Joined: 2005-08-13
Senior Member
Posts: 13503
Joined: 2005-08-13
#4868894 Posted on: 07/09/2014 01:59 PM
It sucks in Windows 7... but works quite well in W8.1.
I have seen a few 4K Monitors mostly 28inch + and the Scaling with Windows sucks so how will it work at 23-24 inches seems kinda crazy and broken to me.
It sucks in Windows 7... but works quite well in W8.1.
David Lake
Senior Member
Posts: 680
Joined: 2008-03-03
Senior Member
Posts: 680
Joined: 2008-03-03
#4868964 Posted on: 07/09/2014 03:13 PM
16:9 sucks, the very second Dell release a 3840x2400 IPS I will be all over it!
16:9 sucks, the very second Dell release a 3840x2400 IPS I will be all over it!
D4rKy21
Senior Member
Posts: 724
Joined: 2007-10-08
Senior Member
Posts: 724
Joined: 2007-10-08
#4868994 Posted on: 07/09/2014 03:52 PM
With a respons time of a drunken monkey no thx.
With a respons time of a drunken monkey no thx.
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9529
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 9529
Joined: 2003-05-24
#4869144 Posted on: 07/09/2014 05:56 PM
NEC announced the release of a new 23.8" sized screen that sits in their EA series. under SKU code EA244UHD the product offers a 4k 3840 x 2160 resolution and an AH-IPS panel. The screen looks t...
NEC EA244UHD 23.8" has 4k IPS Panel
i am intrested 4k 24" monitor as anything bigger and i might as well just use my hdtv.
NEC announced the release of a new 23.8" sized screen that sits in their EA series. under SKU code EA244UHD the product offers a 4k 3840 x 2160 resolution and an AH-IPS panel. The screen looks t...
NEC EA244UHD 23.8" has 4k IPS Panel
i am intrested 4k 24" monitor as anything bigger and i might as well just use my hdtv.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12312
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12312
Joined: 2004-05-16
#4869147 Posted on: 07/09/2014 05:59 PM
Idk what apps you tried but in my experience the DPI scaling has been awful on 4K.
Scaling works pretty much fine in most apps that I tried. Also in this case you're going for 200% scaling, so even legacy apps will look ok as you'd get each pixel upscaled to 2x2 square, so there will be no blur.
Idk what apps you tried but in my experience the DPI scaling has been awful on 4K.
Ven0m
Senior Member
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2005-08-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2005-08-12
#4869171 Posted on: 07/09/2014 06:29 PM
With 150% scaling it may be not the best, also getting .Net 4.5.2 helps with some .Net apps, as prior to that version, there was a bug with Windows.Forms controls scaling. Anyway what I tried and worked perfect, in alphabetical order:
- Battlefield 4
- Diablo 3 in native screen resolution
- Firefox, with all the pages I tried (I haven't tested Flash)
- Notepad++
- Office 2013
- Paint.Net
- Spotify
- SQL Server Management Studio
- Visual Studio 2013
- Windows 8.1 in general
- All Modern UI (Metro) apps
What works poorly:
- Chrome, at least the build I tried at that time was just bad no high-dpi stuff at all, reverting to big pixels
- Diablo 3 required compatibility settings to get it to work at lower res and was showing huge cursor
And that's it. I don't really use much more stuff.
The trick is to use 200% scaling and proper settings to make legacy apps look ok, but I didn't really have to deal with it.
If I could trade my 24" screen for 4k one without huge lag, I'd do it right away.
Idk what apps you tried but in my experience the DPI scaling has been awful on 4K.
With 150% scaling it may be not the best, also getting .Net 4.5.2 helps with some .Net apps, as prior to that version, there was a bug with Windows.Forms controls scaling. Anyway what I tried and worked perfect, in alphabetical order:
- Battlefield 4
- Diablo 3 in native screen resolution
- Firefox, with all the pages I tried (I haven't tested Flash)
- Notepad++
- Office 2013
- Paint.Net
- Spotify
- SQL Server Management Studio
- Visual Studio 2013
- Windows 8.1 in general
- All Modern UI (Metro) apps
What works poorly:
- Chrome, at least the build I tried at that time was just bad no high-dpi stuff at all, reverting to big pixels
- Diablo 3 required compatibility settings to get it to work at lower res and was showing huge cursor
And that's it. I don't really use much more stuff.
The trick is to use 200% scaling and proper settings to make legacy apps look ok, but I didn't really have to deal with it.
If I could trade my 24" screen for 4k one without huge lag, I'd do it right away.
NAMEk
Senior Member
Posts: 654
Joined: 2006-05-26
Senior Member
Posts: 654
Joined: 2006-05-26
#4869220 Posted on: 07/09/2014 07:36 PM
1000:1 doesn't worth the price.
1000:1 doesn't worth the price.
Tree Dude
Senior Member
Posts: 532
Joined: 2005-10-09
Senior Member
Posts: 532
Joined: 2005-10-09
#4869276 Posted on: 07/09/2014 08:42 PM
It's an IPS panel. You give up the ultra fast response of a TN panel for way better colors. But I'd hardly call 6ms "drunken monkey" speed.
That is a true contrast ratio. When you see a monitor with a 1 million to 1 ratio, it's artificially raised by the dynamic back lighting. If you turn that off (which you should if you are gaming) the true ratio will be around 1000:1 in most cases. Besides you should look for color accuracy more than contrast ratio, that is the number that actually means anything.
I personally think 1080p is just fine for me. But I have always been a more mid-range kinda gamer.
With a respons time of a drunken monkey no thx.
It's an IPS panel. You give up the ultra fast response of a TN panel for way better colors. But I'd hardly call 6ms "drunken monkey" speed.
1000:1 doesn't worth the price.
That is a true contrast ratio. When you see a monitor with a 1 million to 1 ratio, it's artificially raised by the dynamic back lighting. If you turn that off (which you should if you are gaming) the true ratio will be around 1000:1 in most cases. Besides you should look for color accuracy more than contrast ratio, that is the number that actually means anything.
I personally think 1080p is just fine for me. But I have always been a more mid-range kinda gamer.
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9195
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9195
Joined: 2006-02-14
#4869525 Posted on: 07/10/2014 01:41 AM
That is a true contrast ratio. When you see a monitor with a 1 million to 1 ratio, it's artificially raised by the dynamic back lighting. If you turn that off (which you should if you are gaming) the true ratio will be around 1000:1 in most cases. Besides you should look for color accuracy more than contrast ratio, that is the number that actually means anything.
Not only that: There is no standard test for contrast ratio. Every company does their own thing and essentially just say whatever the hell they want. Two monitors from different companies rated at 1000:1 could be worlds apart.
That is a true contrast ratio. When you see a monitor with a 1 million to 1 ratio, it's artificially raised by the dynamic back lighting. If you turn that off (which you should if you are gaming) the true ratio will be around 1000:1 in most cases. Besides you should look for color accuracy more than contrast ratio, that is the number that actually means anything.
Not only that: There is no standard test for contrast ratio. Every company does their own thing and essentially just say whatever the hell they want. Two monitors from different companies rated at 1000:1 could be worlds apart.
---TK---
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Joined: 2005-12-10
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Joined: 2005-12-10
#4869543 Posted on: 07/10/2014 01:58 AM
not at that price no thanks, I`ll be on 1440 for a while yet.
not at that price no thanks, I`ll be on 1440 for a while yet.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 340
Joined: 2012-06-12
I have seen a few 4K Monitors mostly 28inch + and the Scaling with Windows sucks so how will it work at 23-24 inches seems kinda crazy and broken to me.