NASA Perseverance rover 200 MHZ CPU costs $200K
Listen, I know we're all complaining about the fact that CPUs and GPUs, components in general are expensive. But wait until you hear this one. NASA Perseverance rover uses a processor that runs at 200 MHz, and it did cost roughly $200K USD.
Obviously, it's a CPU that needs to be able to run in a somewhat stringent environment. But more details on it, have surfaced on the web. The technology of the on-board computer Rover Compute Element (RCE for short) is reduced for performance, far below that of normal desktop PCs.
The chip has a size of 130 mm 2 and a computing power of 240 to 366 MIPS, the processor requires five watts. It has 10.4 million transistors and is manufactured by BAE Systems using the 0.25-micrometer process. According to the manufacturer, the CPU, which costs around $ 200,000, is already in over 250 spacecraft. If the RCE fails, an identical backup system switches on in the Mars rover.
RAD750
The RAD750 processor works with clock rates from 110 to 200 MHz. In addition, the on-board computer has 256 MB of RAM, 2 GB of flash memory and a so-called warm electronics box to maintain a constant system temperature. However, it has a decisive advantage over other systems: robustness. The RCE withstands temperatures from -55 ° C to +125 ° C. In addition, the processor is not only extremely robust against extreme temperatures, but it also withstands radiation levels that would put conventional systems out of action. To put it into perspective: The RAD750 can withstand radiation of up to 10,000 Gray (Gy for short) - 6 Gy means death for humans.
NASA developers already fear that the system will crash in about 15 years due to external circumstances. In addition, the VxWorks operating system working in Perseverance would have to be supplied with new patches at some point. It remains to be seen how long the system will withstand the extremely difficult circumstances on Mars. A similar system of the Mars rover Curiosity has been running for almost ten years.
Senior Member
Posts: 769
Joined: 2016-10-04
"A similar system has been running on Curiosity for nearly 10 years"
Yep, and so will my 1080Ti if thing don't change.
Seems I have to say the same for the 5700XT

Senior Member
Posts: 8235
Joined: 2020-08-03
hwunboxed : "we still would have recommended nasa used a ryzen"
Senior Member
Posts: 769
Joined: 2016-10-04
Consider the Space shuttle (Atlantis etc) computing power was less than 1% that of a Xbox 360 CPU.
Until 1991 used 512kb RAM which was upgraded to 1Mb afterwards until their retirement.
Originally back in the 1970s used 32 gauges, four cathode-ray tubes and a variety of electro-mechanical devices.
Even the new Orion capsule is less powerful than a mobile phone. Is using 2 IBM PowerPC 750X single core processor from 2002!!!!
Soyuz until the 2003 upgrade used a 6kb RAM and computer from the 60s!!!!
The computers used for the lunar landings had 4Kb RAM!!!!!
While Voyager 1 & 2 are running today on a CDP1802 CPU, 70Kb RAM and they communicate to earth with 160 bits per second rate from 13 and 11 billion miles away respectively.
It puts everything in perspective.
FYI SpaceX is not cheapening on computing power.
Falcon 9 is using 3 dual cores, dozens of PowerPC microcontrollers.
Crew Dragon several Tegra 2 for the tablets, touch screens. It has a lot of computing power to even play CP2077.

Senior Member
Posts: 7285
Joined: 2008-03-06
All fine and dandy, but the crucial, most important thing is reliability.
Maybe the CPU is made on that specific node just to give the circuitry more density on trace paths for redundancy and transmission.
New technology is a "convoluted mess" older technology can be refined and honed to perfection, thus achieving reliability.
Convoluted mess - on a tech channel (sorry, I am still looking for it ) an tech engineer confessed that even that everything is well though and designed, there are shortcuts, workarounds and trade secrets. Sh!t works, but don't send that in space, it has a huge probability of failure.
So, NASA wanted the most boring and trustworthy, reliable CPU out there.
Maybe I am wrong and talking crap. Maybe not.
What say you?
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2020-10-02
So, it can run in crisis, but no Crysis.