Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.24.193
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1994
GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24


New Forum Topics
Help my Gtx 970 fan wont slow down AMD reaffirms that the 5.5+ GHz of the Ryzen 7000 in the presentations was achieved without overclocking Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. MSI Gaming Reveals Symbols to Help Identify MEG, MPG, and MAG Series 512.95 - Clean Version The AMD Ryzen All In One Thread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2 EVGA Z690 Dark Kingpin ¿Wich cooler choose? Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC NVIDIA GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download & Discussion




Guru3D.com » News » MSI adds ZEN3 support to Series 400 Chipsets, even with 16 MB BIOS

MSI adds ZEN3 support to Series 400 Chipsets, even with 16 MB BIOS

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 05/28/2020 08:58 AM | source: reddit.com | 50 comment(s)
MSI adds ZEN3 support to Series 400 Chipsets, even with 16 MB BIOS

AMD planned they would only offer ZEN3 support for Series 500 motherboard chipsets, the reversed that decision and stated 32MB BIOS ready motherboards can support ZEN3. Now MSI mentions Zen 3 support on its AMD 400-series Chipset Motherboards with 16MB ROMs.

Yeah, not confusing at all eh? But it's sufficient to say there will be wide support from motherboard manufacturers on the Series 400 chipset platform for ZEN3. Eric van Beurden over at MSI in a presentation confirmed that with the non-MAX motherboards (16MB BIOS) will get Zen 3 support as well as MAX (32MB BIOS) versions with a 'selective BIOS' option.

 



MSI adds ZEN3 support to Series 400 Chipsets, even with 16 MB BIOS MSI adds ZEN3 support to Series 400 Chipsets, even with 16 MB BIOS




« MSI Announces Optix MAG274R Gaming Monitor for E-Sports · MSI adds ZEN3 support to Series 400 Chipsets, even with 16 MB BIOS · White limited edition model of the Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 Plus »

Related Stories

MSI adds GeForce RTX 29070 SUPER to Trident X Plus - 04/02/2020 08:26 AM
MSI announced the new Trident X Plus series model "Trident X Plus 9SD-831JP" which adopts a slim compact housing and the option of an included GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER....

MSI Adds Slim PRO 24X 7M All-in-One PC - 06/04/2018 08:25 AM
The AOI PRO 24X Series is equipped with IPS Grade Panel and narrow bezel design which not only instantly optimizes the screen colors and brightness to ensure that you enjoy every scene at its best, bu...

MSI adds latest AMD BIOS Updates for MSI AM4 motherboards - 05/21/2018 08:13 AM
MSI released updated BIOSed to support AMD 2nd Generation Ryzen Desktop Processors, which also includes security updates since recent public disclosures have brought to the forefront the importance ...

MSI Adds Intel TXE 3.0 Security update to it's motherboards - 10/30/2017 06:01 PM
In order to avoid severe security vulnerabilities for the platforms, MSI motherboards now support the latest Intel Trusted Execution Engine (TXE) 3.0 for safer system protection....

MSI Adds Radeon RX 550 2GT LP OC - 06/27/2017 07:58 AM
And the LP in there would be for low Profile. The entry level card is based on Polaris 12 and has 512 Shader processors.  These cards feature a 128-bit bus, require no external power connectors, an...


10 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


Clouseau
Senior Member



Posts: 2785
Joined: 2011-05-17

#5793433 Posted on: 05/28/2020 07:09 PM
If people did not watch the Gamers Nexus videos or read up on it, 16MB roms were around not because they were cheap but because pre-matisse Ryzens could not address anything above 16MB...in fact if they were put into a board with a 32MB rom and no special tricks applied, the pre-matisse Ryzen would/could not boot. So the boards that have 32MB roms and support pre-matisse Ryzens divide up the rom in such a way that the other half of the rom does not exist for them.

EspHack
Senior Member



Posts: 2728
Joined: 2010-01-03

#5793469 Posted on: 05/28/2020 08:47 PM
When people talk about memories not less than GBs why mobo vendors miserly embed 16 MB BIOS ROMs which were the norms of 2000s ?

I still can't find a straight answer to that

heck why are they even called "rom" at this point? okey the cpu for some reason can't address more than 16mb, so lets partition a 4gb "rom" into whatever many parts it would need to work, done.

I'm looking for something along the lines of "bios rom chips are not normal nand flash, they are incredibly specialized, resilient, low latency, and cost like $10 per megabyte" as a reason for these ridiculously small sizes, but all we get is non answers like "oh yeah 32mb costs way more, so they use 16mb!"

I mean its not like cpu cache, which is very easy to understand why they are as small as they are, this on the other hand just looks like planned obsolescence

Astyanax
Senior Member



Posts: 13297
Joined: 2018-03-21

#5793556 Posted on: 05/29/2020 12:47 AM
but because pre-matisse Ryzens could not address anything above 16MB




Fender178
Senior Member



Posts: 4186
Joined: 2004-09-28

#5793567 Posted on: 05/29/2020 01:26 AM
16MB BIOS ROM are more than enough for storing few KB of AGESA microcode.. The space is "wasted" by 3rd party chipset firmwares, useless functions and graphics effects and of corse ad-hoc system tuning code (eg: overclocking functions, fans tuning) and basic BIOS program.
I disagree because fan control is very important in my mind and the same thing goes for overclocking because you don't want to alienate your customers by getting rid of features for new CPUs. Also why would they make 32mb and beyond boards then? There are boards out there that had to get rid of fan control to support newer CPUs. I think the graphics could be simplified while keeping the pretty menus. This is why the make lower chipset boards with less features because they know those users aren't going try and overclock their CPUs with them.

Cooe
Member



Posts: 39
Joined: 2017-03-03

#5793598 Posted on: 05/29/2020 04:20 AM

Except it's totally not. Zen & Zen+ CPU's can only address a 16MB BIOS. That is hard FACT. Also, AMD NEVER said the Zen 3 support was only coming to 400 series boards with 32MB BIOS chips! Did none of you, including Hilbert, read the actual dang press release? They said they were going to make standard 16MB BIOS boards work in the original announcement by making beta BIOS forks that dropped support for all pre-Ryzen 3000 CPU's. That's LITERALLY what the damn announcement was all about. This article is seriously embarrassing for this site tbh...

10 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022