Corsair H115i RGB Pro XT liquid cooler review
XFX Radeon RX 5600 XT THICC 3 review
Fractal Design Define 7 XL review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - January 2020
Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GamingPro review
Team Group T-Force DarkZα 3600 MHz DDR4 review
Corsair Scimitar Elite RGB gaming mouse review
Cougar 700K Evo keyboard review
Aorus Liquid Cooler 360 review
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X review
Mozilla not happy about Microsoft moving to Chromium project
Mozilla not happy about Microsoft moving to Chromium project, the devs of the Mozilla project can smell the competition and claim by adopting Chromium, “Microsoft hands over control of even more of online life to Google”.
Last week the news surfaced that Microsoft will be replacing the Edge browser based on Edgehtml with an engine based on the Chromium engine, reports myce.
Mozilla in their argument thinks the swap to Chromium would bring Google even more control over the web and potentially make it harder for Firefox. Mozilla’s CEO, Chris Beard writes, “will Microsoft’s decision make it harder for Firefox to prosper? It could. Making Google more powerful is risky on many fronts.”
Beard fears that Google will soon have a monopoly on the internet. He writes about that, “If one product like Chromium has enough market share, then it becomes easier for web developers and businesses to decide not to worry if their services and sites work with anything other than Chromium. That’s what happened when Microsoft had a monopoly on browsers in the early 2000s before Firefox was released. And it could happen again.”
Beard also writes he understands that from Microsoft’s business point of view it’s no longer profitable to fight Google, but stresses how important it is that not a single company has control over the internet. He writes, “from a social, civic and individual empowerment perspective ceding control of fundamental online infrastructure to a single company is terrible. This is why Mozilla exists. We compete with Google not because it’s a good business opportunity. We compete with Google because the health of the internet and online life depend on competition and choice.”
Therefore, Beard calls for users that care about the web to try Firefox again for at least a week. Especially users who haven’t used the browser the last two years should notice it’s “radically better”. He concludes his call for a more diverse web with, “your use helps web developers and businesses think beyond Chrome. And this helps Firefox and Mozilla make overall life on the internet better — more choice, more security options, more competition.”
Download Mozilla Firefox 23 - 08/08/2013 06:57 AM
Mozilla has published Firefox 22, you can download it over here or wait for the automatic update if you already have Firefox. New in this release is asm.js, a feature that compiles JavaScript to assem...
Download Mozilla Firefox 22 - 06/26/2013 03:13 PM
Mozilla has published Firefox 22, you can download it over here or wait for the automatic update if you already have Firefox. New in this release is asm.js, a feature that compiles JavaScript to assem...
Mozilla shows Firefox OS Developer Preview Phone - 01/23/2013 09:06 AM
Mozilla has prepped a Developer Preview smartphone with the company's future Firefox OS. It's a pretty basic phone with a 3.5" HVGA touchscreen, a 1GHz Snapdragon S1 processor, 512MB RAM, 4GB ...
Mozilla to continue 64-bit Firefox development for Windows - 12/24/2012 09:44 AM
Earlier on we heard likewise, but Mozilla engineering manager Benjamin Smedberg announced that there's been a change of plan regarding the foundation's move to kill of the 64-bit version of Firefox...
Mozilla Stops Firefox 64-bit Development - 11/23/2012 08:30 AM
Weird, It looks like Mozilla has given up on developing Firefox 64-bit and it seems the decision is final.Citing reasons that Firefox 64-bit is a "constant source of misunderstanding and frustr...
RzrTrek
Senior Member
Posts: 2358
Joined: 2012-04-16
Senior Member
Posts: 2358
Joined: 2012-04-16
#5615862 Posted on: 12/10/2018 06:22 PM
I prefer Firefox and use it daily as my main web browser, but I think they're just salty because Microsoft chose Chromium.
I prefer Firefox and use it daily as my main web browser, but I think they're just salty because Microsoft chose Chromium.
slyphnier
Senior Member
Posts: 706
Joined: 2009-11-30
Senior Member
Posts: 706
Joined: 2009-11-30
#5615900 Posted on: 12/10/2018 07:57 PM
well in current internet world, people just pick what "easiest+smoothest" for them
just realize why u pick ur current browser? simply because it work-best for u right ?
if firefox create better browser for most people, they will jump in...
but rivaling google isnt easy ... android with default chrome browser is like windows - IE
that alone enough to survive quite time like IE
but then with chrome, google succesful creating something that most people dont hate ... not like IE
like easy sync between smartphone to pc is really convinient ... although firefox have such addons
but before using firefox, they already got and use chrome, and as for most people, they wont see any difference between 2 browser... they will use what they got in first place
i myself been switch various browser, firefox-chrome and other custom-build-browser
still main on firefox for several reasons... in past firefox addons really much better than chrome, but now both got same addons, like playstore & apps-store
well in current internet world, people just pick what "easiest+smoothest" for them
just realize why u pick ur current browser? simply because it work-best for u right ?
if firefox create better browser for most people, they will jump in...
but rivaling google isnt easy ... android with default chrome browser is like windows - IE
that alone enough to survive quite time like IE
but then with chrome, google succesful creating something that most people dont hate ... not like IE
like easy sync between smartphone to pc is really convinient ... although firefox have such addons
but before using firefox, they already got and use chrome, and as for most people, they wont see any difference between 2 browser... they will use what they got in first place
i myself been switch various browser, firefox-chrome and other custom-build-browser
still main on firefox for several reasons... in past firefox addons really much better than chrome, but now both got same addons, like playstore & apps-store
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4712
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4712
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5615907 Posted on: 12/10/2018 08:11 PM
well in current internet world, people just pick what "easiest+smoothest" for them
just realize why u pick ur current browser? simply because it work-best for u right ?
if firefox create better browser for most people, they will jump in...
People pick the path of least resistance. That doesn't mean they pick the easiest, smoothest, or best choice. Internet Explorer is a solid example of this - it survived far longer than it should have, simply because it came with Windows and had a very generic name that was easy to understand.
Firefox isn't behind Chrome because it's inferior, it's because Chrome has a multi-billion dollar corporation behind it, and itss engine appeals to others like Apple and MS. Chrome is also pre-packaged with a bunch of other programs, and is sometimes advertised when browsing Google. All of this led up to its success.
Considering how tiny Mozilla is and the lack of resources to really get Firefox out there, it's actually pretty amazing Firefox can even compete at all.
well in current internet world, people just pick what "easiest+smoothest" for them
just realize why u pick ur current browser? simply because it work-best for u right ?
if firefox create better browser for most people, they will jump in...
People pick the path of least resistance. That doesn't mean they pick the easiest, smoothest, or best choice. Internet Explorer is a solid example of this - it survived far longer than it should have, simply because it came with Windows and had a very generic name that was easy to understand.
Firefox isn't behind Chrome because it's inferior, it's because Chrome has a multi-billion dollar corporation behind it, and itss engine appeals to others like Apple and MS. Chrome is also pre-packaged with a bunch of other programs, and is sometimes advertised when browsing Google. All of this led up to its success.
Considering how tiny Mozilla is and the lack of resources to really get Firefox out there, it's actually pretty amazing Firefox can even compete at all.
Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 19465
Joined: 2010-04-21
Senior Member
Posts: 19465
Joined: 2010-04-21
#5615920 Posted on: 12/10/2018 08:45 PM
Surely the only people who will start using Edge chromium edition are already Edge users?
Surely the only people who will start using Edge chromium edition are already Edge users?
HeavyHemi
Senior Member
Posts: 6478
Joined: 2008-10-27
Senior Member
Posts: 6478
Joined: 2008-10-27
#5615923 Posted on: 12/10/2018 09:04 PM
People pick the path of least resistance. That doesn't mean they pick the easiest, smoothest, or best choice. Internet Explorer is a solid example of this - it survived far longer than it should have, simply because it came with Windows and had a very generic name that was easy to understand.
Firefox isn't behind Chrome because it's inferior, it's because Chrome has a multi-billion dollar corporation behind it, and itss engine appeals to others like Apple and MS. Chrome is also pre-packaged with a bunch of other programs, and is sometimes advertised when browsing Google. All of this led up to its success.
Considering how tiny Mozilla is and the lack of resources to really get Firefox out there, it's actually pretty amazing Firefox can even compete at all.
Well....Google agreed to pay Mozilla just under a billion dollars over three years in exchange for keeping Google as its default search engine...
Revenue US$ 562.3 million...in 2017
People pick the path of least resistance. That doesn't mean they pick the easiest, smoothest, or best choice. Internet Explorer is a solid example of this - it survived far longer than it should have, simply because it came with Windows and had a very generic name that was easy to understand.
Firefox isn't behind Chrome because it's inferior, it's because Chrome has a multi-billion dollar corporation behind it, and itss engine appeals to others like Apple and MS. Chrome is also pre-packaged with a bunch of other programs, and is sometimes advertised when browsing Google. All of this led up to its success.
Considering how tiny Mozilla is and the lack of resources to really get Firefox out there, it's actually pretty amazing Firefox can even compete at all.
Well....Google agreed to pay Mozilla just under a billion dollars over three years in exchange for keeping Google as its default search engine...
Revenue US$ 562.3 million...in 2017
D3M1G0D
Senior Member
Posts: 2074
Joined: 2017-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2074
Joined: 2017-03-10
#5615927 Posted on: 12/10/2018 09:27 PM
I don't blame Microsoft for adopting Chromium - Edge was going nowhere fast. This probably won't change much as Edge wasn't a big player anyways, but it's symbolically important - MS capitulating to Google. I can understand why Mozilla would be upset but I think this was more-or-less inevitable - Google has already won the second browser wars.
As for me, I use Chrome since I want to keep things synced across desktop and mobile. I also use a lot of Google services (my photos and videos on Google Photos, music subscription to Google Music, YouTube for videos) so I'm heavily invested in the Google ecosystem overall.
I don't blame Microsoft for adopting Chromium - Edge was going nowhere fast. This probably won't change much as Edge wasn't a big player anyways, but it's symbolically important - MS capitulating to Google. I can understand why Mozilla would be upset but I think this was more-or-less inevitable - Google has already won the second browser wars.
As for me, I use Chrome since I want to keep things synced across desktop and mobile. I also use a lot of Google services (my photos and videos on Google Photos, music subscription to Google Music, YouTube for videos) so I'm heavily invested in the Google ecosystem overall.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4712
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4712
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5615929 Posted on: 12/10/2018 09:30 PM
You can do pretty much all of that in Firefox too, it just takes slightly more work since it doesn't tend to come with any phones.
As for me, I use Chrome since I want to keep things synced across desktop and mobile. I also use a lot of Google services (my photos and videos on Google Photos, music subscription to Google Music, YouTube for videos) so I'm heavily invested in the Google ecosystem overall.
You can do pretty much all of that in Firefox too, it just takes slightly more work since it doesn't tend to come with any phones.
Order_66
Senior Member
Posts: 212
Joined: 2008-07-19
Senior Member
Posts: 212
Joined: 2008-07-19
#5615934 Posted on: 12/10/2018 09:43 PM
Not to mention the Chinese spyware integrated into opera a couple of years ago.
Boohoo, boohuh, but Opera died long time ago. I remember how it USED to be a good, fast and non-intrusive browser... Up to, like, version 5.0 (10 years ago, or so). Lately, it has become a terrible piece of bloatware.
Not to mention the Chinese spyware integrated into opera a couple of years ago.
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 9069
Joined: 2004-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 9069
Joined: 2004-05-10
#5615943 Posted on: 12/10/2018 10:13 PM
Edge will use Chrome extensions. Cool. Lets see how it turns out. As much as I hated Edge earlier on, its kind or grown on me. I dont mind using it now.. (for up to 10 minutes
). FF still my main one.
Edge will use Chrome extensions. Cool. Lets see how it turns out. As much as I hated Edge earlier on, its kind or grown on me. I dont mind using it now.. (for up to 10 minutes
). FF still my main one.
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 4778
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 4778
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5615962 Posted on: 12/10/2018 11:13 PM
maybe firefox shouldn't have sold out to the common pleb and developed towards their poweruser base instead.
maybe firefox shouldn't have sold out to the common pleb and developed towards their poweruser base instead.
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 4778
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 4778
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5615963 Posted on: 12/10/2018 11:14 PM
Bullshit.
I've tried Firefox countless times over the years, including a couple of times in the last few months, and every single time, within minutes, I've run across a website that does not work correctly, or renders so badly as to make the site unusable. I'm sorry, Firefox. Get your act together and I'll use your browser.
Bullshit.
Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 19465
Joined: 2010-04-21
Senior Member
Posts: 19465
Joined: 2010-04-21
#5615966 Posted on: 12/10/2018 11:18 PM
Link to sites that don't work under FF, if it is within minutes they should be pretty easy to find
I've tried Firefox countless times over the years, including a couple of times in the last few months, and every single time, within minutes, I've run across a website that does not work correctly, or renders so badly as to make the site unusable. I'm sorry, Firefox. Get your act together and I'll use your browser.
Link to sites that don't work under FF, if it is within minutes they should be pretty easy to find
Killian38
Senior Member
Posts: 312
Joined: 2017-09-02
Senior Member
Posts: 312
Joined: 2017-09-02
#5615968 Posted on: 12/10/2018 11:20 PM
Google does it better. I can see why it's more popular. If Google ends up owning the Net it's because no one else had what it took to beat google. Sounds like we have some butt hurt dev's from firefox that can't get their $h*t together.
netscape navigator is by far a better browser.
Google does it better. I can see why it's more popular. If Google ends up owning the Net it's because no one else had what it took to beat google. Sounds like we have some butt hurt dev's from firefox that can't get their $h*t together.
netscape navigator is by far a better browser.
sykozis
Senior Member
Posts: 21248
Joined: 2008-07-14
Senior Member
Posts: 21248
Joined: 2008-07-14
#5616004 Posted on: 12/11/2018 01:27 AM
I love how Mozilla's CEO blames MS for events of the "early 2000s".... Mozilla Foundation made the decision in 1998 to sell Netscape Corp to America Online, only to later release the Mozilla browser and then replace it with Firefox. Mozilla could have simply held onto Netscape Corporation and transitioned those users to Firefox when the browser was ready. Instead, they willingly gave up their "browser market share" to America Online who eventually ruined the Netscape browser. When you willingly sell market share, you have no right to complain about the end result....
I love how Mozilla's CEO blames MS for events of the "early 2000s".... Mozilla Foundation made the decision in 1998 to sell Netscape Corp to America Online, only to later release the Mozilla browser and then replace it with Firefox. Mozilla could have simply held onto Netscape Corporation and transitioned those users to Firefox when the browser was ready. Instead, they willingly gave up their "browser market share" to America Online who eventually ruined the Netscape browser. When you willingly sell market share, you have no right to complain about the end result....
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 847
Joined: 2002-09-14
Boohoo, boohuh, but Opera died long time ago. I remember how it USED to be a good, fast and non-intrusive browser... Up to, like, version 5.0 (10 years ago, or so). Lately, it has become a terrible piece of bloatware.