DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
More Photos of Radeon R9 Nano Surface + launch date
We covered similar photos from Elmy a couple of time now, he posted some new ones though. Below the fold you can now check some new ones of the Radeon R9 Nano which according to the latest rumors will launch Thursday, 27th August, 2015 with reviews and channel availibility roughly a week later
AMD states that that the card will be faster than the Radeon R9 290X yet offering 90% higher performance-per-Watt with a 50% higher performance-per-Watt than the Radeon R9 Fury X.
Meanwhile AMD also released some presentation slides indicative of performane:
Check his older photos here and here.
« Phanteks Launches Enthoo Evolv ITX Special Edition · More Photos of Radeon R9 Nano Surface + launch date
· AMD Showcases Graphics, Energy Efficient Computing and Die-Stacking Innovation »
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 12901
Joined: 2003-05-24
Senior Member
Posts: 12901
Joined: 2003-05-24
#5147421 Posted on: 08/26/2015 12:16 AM
I like the performance/watt it has
I like the performance/watt it has
CalculuS
Senior Member
Posts: 3165
Joined: 2014-07-28
Senior Member
Posts: 3165
Joined: 2014-07-28
#5147422 Posted on: 08/26/2015 12:18 AM
I'm excited to see what the price is going to be about this. Its either gonna be priced amazingly or awful.
I'm excited to see what the price is going to be about this. Its either gonna be priced amazingly or awful.
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 1191
Joined: 2013-02-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1191
Joined: 2013-02-22
#5147638 Posted on: 08/26/2015 09:46 AM
I don't think I elieve the specs in the link it shows the the nano with the same specs as the fury x only it's about 100w less either it's fake or am has done something amazing at the fab level of the chip.
I don't think I elieve the specs in the link it shows the the nano with the same specs as the fury x only it's about 100w less either it's fake or am has done something amazing at the fab level of the chip.
Isbre
Senior Member
Posts: 196
Joined: 2011-04-09
Senior Member
Posts: 196
Joined: 2011-04-09
#5147677 Posted on: 08/26/2015 10:50 AM
They have actually confirmed the specs too. wow. Probably more lies again. I really hope for all our sakes they are not doing just that. Sorry but I'm not very optimistic anymore when it comes to AMD promises.
But then again, that will have to be not far from the truth. That little cooler cant handle much more really.
They have actually confirmed the specs too. wow. Probably more lies again. I really hope for all our sakes they are not doing just that. Sorry but I'm not very optimistic anymore when it comes to AMD promises.
But then again, that will have to be not far from the truth. That little cooler cant handle much more really.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 152
Joined: 2013-11-26
I hope this little one will bring some much needed customers to AMD. Go, go, Red Team! We need competition on the market