Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Cougar Terminator gaming chair review
G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled

New Downloads
HWiNFO Download v7.42
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4257
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta4 Download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.88
GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.2 WHQL download
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1


New Forum Topics
New Details Emerge on AMDs A620 Chipset: What We Know So Far NVIDIA GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver Download & Discussion NVIDIA's Upcoming RTX 4070 Graphics Card to Cost $599 Entertainment Software Association (ESA) Cancels E3 2023 Event due to Lack of Industry Support Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Release Discovery 22.12.2 WHQL Review: Cougar Terminator gaming chair The AMD Ryzen All In One Thread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2 QNAP Issues Urgent Warning to Customers Regarding Critical Linux Vulnerability ASUS Launches Next-Generation Chromebox 5 (CN67) for Unmatched Performance and Sleek Design MSI AB / RTSS development news thread




Guru3D.com » News » MLC SSDs just as reliable as SLC anno 2016 says Google

MLC SSDs just as reliable as SLC anno 2016 says Google

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 02/29/2016 09:43 AM | source: | 8 comment(s)
MLC SSDs just as reliable as SLC anno 2016 says Google

If there is one party that makes use of a lot of NAND based storage, well .. it's Google in their data-centers of course. They published the results of a study on production lifecycle data, SSD reliability and guess what SSDs fail differently than HDDs.

ZDNet has the skinny on this one in a preliminary article; FAST 2016 paper Flash Reliability in Production: The Expected and the Unexpected, (the paper is not available online until Friday) by Professor Bianca Schroeder of the University of Toronto, and Raghav Lagisetty and Arif Merchant of Google, covers:

  • Millions of drive days over 6 years
  • 10 different drive models
  • 3 different flash types: MLC, eMLC and SLC
  • Enterprise and consumer drives

KEY CONCLUSIONS

  • Ignore Uncorrectable Bit Error Rate (UBER) specs. A meaningless number.
  • Good news: Raw Bit Error Rate (RBER) increases slower than expected from wearout and is not correlated with UBER or other failures.
  • High-end SLC drives are no more reliable that MLC drives.
  • Bad news: SSDs fail at a lower rate than disks, but UBER rate is higher (see below for what this means).
  • SSD age, not usage, affects reliability.
  • Bad blocks in new SSDs are common, and drives with a large number of bad blocks are much more likely to lose hundreds of other blocks, most likely due to die or chip failure.
  • 30-80 percent of SSDs develop at least one bad block and 2-7 percent develop at least one bad chip in the first four years of deployment.

Two standout conclusions from the study. First, that MLC drives are as reliable as the more costly SLC "enteprise" drives. This mirrors hard drive experience, where consumer SATA drives have been found to be as reliable as expensive SAS and Fibre Channel drives.

One of the major reasons that "enterprise" SSDs are more expensive is due to greater over-provisioning. SSDs are over-provisioned for two main reasons: to allow for ample bad block replacement caused by flash wearout; and, to ensure that garbage collection does not cause write slowdowns.

The paper's second major conclusion, that age, not use, correlates with increasing error rates, means that over-provisioning for fear of flash wearout is not needed. None of the drives in the study came anywhere near their write limits, even the 3,000 writes specified for the MLC drives.

But it isn't all good news. SSD UBER rates are higher than disk rates, which means that backing up SSDs is even more important than it is with disks. The SSD is less likely to fail during its normal life, but more likely to lose data.







« Rumor haz it: Battlefield 5 will be themed after WW1 released in October · MLC SSDs just as reliable as SLC anno 2016 says Google · Shuttle Announces Skylake based DH110 4K Ultra HD Slim PC »

2 pages 1 2


bemaniac
Senior Member



Posts: 324
Joined: 2009-03-17

#5237637 Posted on: 02/29/2016 03:52 PM
do you mean mlc just as reliable as slc?

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 45920
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5237639 Posted on: 02/29/2016 03:54 PM
Whoops !

slyphnier
Senior Member



Posts: 813
Joined: 2009-11-30

#5237705 Posted on: 02/29/2016 06:24 PM
SSD age, not usage, affects reliability.
this claim ... i wonder how they test it ...
its hard to believe they purchase some SSD just to store it

last time i read that ssd only can retain/hold data 3-4 months for enterprise while consumer ssd can hold around 1 year

now another cons of SSD...
i think we still need more time before completely ditching tradiotional hdd and move to SSD completely

and if that limitation of memory-chip, then it might as well will never replacing traditional hdd

Reddoguk
Senior Member



Posts: 2531
Joined: 2010-05-26

#5237768 Posted on: 02/29/2016 09:03 PM
"30-80 percent of SSDs develop at least one bad block and 2-7 percent develop at least one bad chip in the first four years of deployment".

WTH does that even mean? Such a wide difference between 30% and 80%.

Is it different brands some 30 some 80% or what.

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 14046
Joined: 2004-05-16

#5237778 Posted on: 02/29/2016 09:29 PM
"30-80 percent of SSDs develop at least one bad block and 2-7 percent develop at least one bad chip in the first four years of deployment".

WTH does that even mean? Such a wide difference between 30% and 80%.

Is it different brands some 30 some 80% or what.

80% of devices develop a bad block 30% of the time.

lol, no idea

2 pages 1 2


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023