ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
MK809III Quad-Core Android 4.2 Mini PC TV Stick
Here's another affordable quad-core Android 4.2 mini PC TV stick for you to grab, the MK809III. Priced at just $75.99, the device is equipped with a 1.6GHz RK3188 ARM Cortex-A9 quad-core processor, a Mali-400MP4 GPU, a 2GB DDR3 RAM, an 8GB of NAND flash storage, a microSD card slot (up to 32GB), 1080p Full HD video playback support, Adobe Flash 11 support, WiFi, Bluetooth 4.0, a micro-USB port, a USB port, an HDMI connection interface and runs on Android 4.2 Jelly Bean OS.
MK809III 1.6GHz Max Android 4.2 RK3188 Quad Core Google TV Box 2GB/8GB HD 1080P Bluetooth OTG Mini PC
Main Features
- Google Android 4.2 Quad Core 1.6GHz Mini PC TV Box
- 2GB DDR3 RAM,8GB NAND FLASH ROM
- Quad Core RK3188 ARM Cortex-A9 process.1.6GHZ,Mali-400MP4 Quad-core GPU
- Built-in Bluetooth ,WiFi 802.11b/g/n 10/100Mbps With internal Antenna
- Expand Micro SD: T-Flash(Maximum support 32GB)
- Support Adobe Flash 11.X
Specification
|
Item |
Description |
|
CPU |
Rockchip RK3188 Quad core Cortex A9 1.6Ghz |
|
Ram |
DDR3 2GB |
|
Rom |
NAND Flash 8G |
|
Expand Micro SD |
T-Flash(Maximum support 32GB) |
|
Video Format |
MPEG-1/MPEG-2/MPEG-4/H.263/H.264/AVS/VC-1/RV8/RV9/RV10/VP6/VP8/Sorenson Spark/MVC 1080P@60fps (1920X1080) |
|
Audio Format |
Support: MP3/WMA/APE/FLAC/AAC/OGG/AC3/WAV |
|
Picture Format |
Support: Max.8000x8000 JPEG BMP GIF PNG |
|
BlueTooth |
Support Bluetooth V4.0 |
|
WIFI |
Support 802.11 b/g/n |
|
Output |
HDMI Port |
|
Ports |
1*Micro USB,Support OTG |
|
1*Standard USB |
|
|
1*Micro USB For power |
|
|
1*TF Card slot |
|
|
1*Physical button(for upgrading software) |
|
|
OS |
Google Android 4.2(Flash 11.X；HTML5) |
|
Dimensions / W x D x H |
105mm*40mm*10mm |
|
Net Weight |
40g |
|
Package Weight |
0.2kg |
|
Working environment |
5°C--35°C，30%--90% Humidity |
|
Storage environment |
-20°C--60°C，10%--90% Humidity |
|
Package Contain |
1 x TV Box 1 x AC Adapter 1 x USB Cable 1 x HDMI Cable 1 x User Manual |
XBEAST
Senior Member
Posts: 1600
Joined: 2009-07-27
Senior Member
Posts: 1600
Joined: 2009-07-27
#4627183 Posted on: 07/27/2013 08:50 PM
Both will work. Intel will work better in games. Situation may or may not change after next-gen consoles are released.
Both will work. Intel will work better in games. Situation may or may not change after next-gen consoles are released.
eclap
Senior Member
Posts: 31492
Joined: 2005-01-08
Senior Member
Posts: 31492
Joined: 2005-01-08
#4627185 Posted on: 07/27/2013 08:59 PM
Only AMD cpu I'd consider is an 8350, it performs about the same as any Intel processor in games from what I've seen.
Sort of wrong forum section btw.
Incorrect. It all depends on the game, in some games Intel will have a fair advantage. That being said, a fx 8320 is a great cpu for your money
Only AMD cpu I'd consider is an 8350, it performs about the same as any Intel processor in games from what I've seen.
Sort of wrong forum section btw.
Incorrect. It all depends on the game, in some games Intel will have a fair advantage. That being said, a fx 8320 is a great cpu for your money
CPC_RedDawn
Senior Member
Posts: 9784
Joined: 2008-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 9784
Joined: 2008-01-06
#4627187 Posted on: 07/27/2013 08:59 PM
It will work fine. If your on a budget go with AMD 8320 or 8350 and use the extra cash for a better GPU. Games these days rely more on the GPU than they do the CPU. Take my rig for example, I am still on the x58 platform with an i7 960 D0 @ 4.2GHz this was released in 2009 and there has been nothing released that I have seen that would warrant an upgrade as I mainly use my PC for gaming. Though since I have had this CPU I have upgraded my GPU from 4870x2 >> GTX480 >> x2 7970 Xfire >> Downgraded to single 7970 due to frame rating issues when using Xfire.
The GPU is much much more important. I would go with an 8350 get a decent cooler like a H80i or Noctua NH-D14 (if your case can hold it) and then get a decent motherboard for overclocking it. There are tons of guides on how to do this.
Then for GPU, I too would go with a single AMD offering as their drivers have improved excellently in the past 6 months and you could get a never settle deal netting you some great games. A 7870 or 7850 would do the trick, if you go 7870 make sure its the Tahiti LE version as you get more cores and better overclocking too.
Couple all this with 8GB DDR3 memory AT LEAST 1600MHz and your laughing.
It will work fine. If your on a budget go with AMD 8320 or 8350 and use the extra cash for a better GPU. Games these days rely more on the GPU than they do the CPU. Take my rig for example, I am still on the x58 platform with an i7 960 D0 @ 4.2GHz this was released in 2009 and there has been nothing released that I have seen that would warrant an upgrade as I mainly use my PC for gaming. Though since I have had this CPU I have upgraded my GPU from 4870x2 >> GTX480 >> x2 7970 Xfire >> Downgraded to single 7970 due to frame rating issues when using Xfire.
The GPU is much much more important. I would go with an 8350 get a decent cooler like a H80i or Noctua NH-D14 (if your case can hold it) and then get a decent motherboard for overclocking it. There are tons of guides on how to do this.
Then for GPU, I too would go with a single AMD offering as their drivers have improved excellently in the past 6 months and you could get a never settle deal netting you some great games. A 7870 or 7850 would do the trick, if you go 7870 make sure its the Tahiti LE version as you get more cores and better overclocking too.
Couple all this with 8GB DDR3 memory AT LEAST 1600MHz and your laughing.
SSJBillClinton
Senior Member
Posts: 766
Joined: 2011-11-26
Senior Member
Posts: 766
Joined: 2011-11-26
#4627192 Posted on: 07/27/2013 09:05 PM
Ah right, there were a couple of games I saw where Intel had a huge advantage like Natural Selection 2, but there didn't really seem to be that many to warrant spending extra on an Intel CPU if you're using your PC for just games.
Incorrect. It all depends on the game, in some games Intel will have a fair advantage. That being said, a fx 8320 is a great cpu for your money
Ah right, there were a couple of games I saw where Intel had a huge advantage like Natural Selection 2, but there didn't really seem to be that many to warrant spending extra on an Intel CPU if you're using your PC for just games.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 766
Joined: 2011-11-26
Only AMD cpu I'd consider is an 8350, it performs about the same as any Intel processor in games from what I've seen.
Sort of wrong forum section btw.