Microsoft warns it will halt mainstream support for Windows 7
Microsoft has issued a warning that they will halt mainstream support for Windows 7 in six months. After that timeframe the OS will go into extended support, this also applies to Office 2010 SP1 and all Windows Server 2008 versions. These all have mainstream support, including the five-year period of free updates such as security patches and new functionality.
The products are now entering the phase of extended support, which only entails free security updates, no new functionality is added. Further extensions and patches may be but these would have to be paid for.
Mainstream support for Windows 7 Starter, Home Premium, Ultimate, Professional and Enterprise stops on January 13, 2015. The N-variants and Service Pack 1 installation are irrelevant to the expiry of the deadline. The extended support from Microsoft will halt at on 14 January 2020.
Office 2010 Service Pack 1 mainstream support ends October 14, 2014, Windows Server 2008 similar and thus Windows 7, January 13, 2015.
The next version of Windows that will come to a grinding hlat support wise is Windows Vista, it reached EOL on April 11th, 2017. Support for Windows 8 halts completely on January 10, 2023
Windows 'Threshold Microsoft's plan to win over Windows 7 users - 07/02/2014 09:06 AM
Over at ZDnet Mary Jo wrote an intersting article on Microsoft's main goals with 'Threshold,' the next major version of Windows, is to win over Windows 7 hold-outs. According her this update arriv...
Microsoft might disable Live Tiles in a Future Windows Desktop versions - 07/01/2014 08:32 AM
Microsoft would be planning the remove the Live Tiles start screen from Windows for PCs in a future version of Windows. The Windows version for tablets and hybrids would still keep that function of co...
No Microsoft Start Menu for Windows 8 until 2015 - 06/02/2014 04:47 PM
Uh-oh ... In a report from it is mentioned that it's looking like Microsoft's new 'mini' Start Menu for Windows 8.x won't be part of Windows 8.1 Update 2 as originally planned. Right now it looks...
Microsoft warns against registry hack that allows Windows XP updates - 05/28/2014 08:51 AM
Officially, Microsoft stopped releasing automatic public updates for Windows XP over a month ago after over 12 years. Now a registry hack has been found that, when placed in the OS, allows it to con...
Microsoft Releases the 12-inch Surface Pro 3 - 05/21/2014 07:20 AM
Microsoft introduced the Surface Pro 3, a new laptop-replacement tablet with a 12" Full HD screen. Today we announced Surface Pro 3. It’s the tablet that can replace your laptop. Acc...
Senior Member
Posts: 17868
Joined: 2012-05-18
Windows 8.1 is vista2? Right..
If you can't cope with "new" GUI that doesn't automatically make it Vista2, have some common sense people. Win7 actually looks more like Vista then anything else, Imo Win7 should be that Vista2.
Senior Member
Posts: 4196
Joined: 2004-09-28
Windows 8.1 is vista2? Right..
If you can't cope with "new" GUI that doesn't automatically make it Vista2, have some common sense people. Win7 actually looks more like Vista then anything else, Imo Win7 should be that Vista2.
Very well said. I doubt that Windows 8 had the driver issues that Vista had either. I wonder how many people complained about the switch from Windows 3.11 that didn't have the start menu to Windows 95 which introduced it?
Senior Member
Posts: 1249
Joined: 2013-02-22
windows 7 already works well and as long as its secure im happy.
Senior Member
Posts: 2515
Joined: 2011-05-19
I'n going to hold my breath!
Senior Member
Posts: 4196
Joined: 2004-09-28
This has to do with Windows 7 installs without SP1 only. Besides, next year will mean the OS is 6 years old at that point. No big deal and besides, added new stuff would not do businesses any good. (You do not want to start adding stuff and breaking things that worked already on the existing OS installation.)
Edit: Basically, we need to get over ourselves, Microsoft is not a charity.
My guess is they would straight up replace the servers at that point. (An 11 year old server would need replacing anyways.)
Well yes very true. Even upgrading to Server 2008 would probably require replacing the server as well.