MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Marketing slides confirm Core i9-10900K, i7-10700K and i5-10600K
Well, it's not exactly a secret as to what to expect with Comet lake for Desktop, the difference however is that some leaked slides that do seem to originate from intel confirm some processors and core counts.
So here is the thing, over the weekend some slides of top three Comet lake models have appeared in Intel's upcoming line of desktop processors. The images partially confirm previously leaked specifications. The slides posted by VideoCardz confirm that the Core i9 gets ten cores. The i7 and i5 have eight and six cores, respectively. The three processors all have hyperthreading. The top model goes up to 5.3GHz with Thermal Velocity Boost.
The flagship proc would be the Core i9-10900K with ten cores and hyperthreading, where a single core would go up to 5.3 GHz with Thermal Velocity Boost. All cores clock looks to be 4.9 GHz would be possible, although this is not confirmed in the slides. A Core i7-10700K with eight cores and sixteen threads would lock in at of 5.1 GHz on a single core. There is also an unlocked Core i5 from the party and the 10600K. The six cores and twelve threads will run a maximum of 4.8 GHz. Intel reportedly announced the processors on April 30. Currently, the processor deck would show to be something like this:
| CPU | Cores / Threads | Base Clock | Single Core Turbo | Max Turbo 3.0 | All Core Turbo | Thermal Velocity Boost | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| i9-10900K | 10C / 20T | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 5.3 / 4.9 GHz | 125W |
| i9-10900KF | 10C / 20T | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 5.3 / 4.9 GHz | 125W |
| i9-10900 | 10C / 20T | 2.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | 5.2 / 4.6 GHz | 65W |
| i9-10900F | 10C / 20T | 2.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | 5.2 / 4.6 GHz | 65W |
| i7-10700K | 8C / 16T | 3.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz | TBA | 125W |
| i7-10700KF | 8C / 16T | 3.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz | TBA | 125W |
| i7-10700 | 8C / 16T | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i7-10700F | 8C / 16T | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i5-10600K | 6C / 12T | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz | TBA | 4.5 GHz | TBA | 125W |
| i5-10600KF | 6C / 12T | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz | TBA | 4.5 GHz | TBA | 125W |
| i5-10600 | 6C / 12T | 3.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz | TBA | 4.4 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i5-10500 | 6C / 12T | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | TBA | 4.2 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i5-10400 | 6C / 12T | 2.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz | TBA | 4.0 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i5-10400F | 6C / 12T | 2.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz | TBA | 4.0 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i3-10320 | 4C / 8T | 3.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | TBA | 4.4 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i3-10300 | 4C / 8T | 3.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz | TBA | 4.2 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i3-10100 | 4C / 8T | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz | TBA | 4.1 GHz | TBA | 65W |
Xe GPU marketing managers Chris Hook and Heather Lennon leave Intel - 11/28/2019 03:10 PM
You've heard us writing about Chris Hook a couple of times already, he followed Raja Koduri towards Intel and was responsible for all AMD Marketing GPU related, with a similar position at Intel. At...
Intel snatches more AMD staff for its Xe GPU team, Heather Lennon from AMD RTG Digital Marketing - 04/09/2019 08:33 AM
Ever since a year or so, it's been a bit of a mud-fight among Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA. It pretty much started when Raja Koduri from AMD (leader of the AMD RTG team) made a move towards Intel to develo...
Intel Core i7-9750H and GeForce GTX 1650 Perfs leaks though marketing material - 04/08/2019 11:56 AM
In the Asia region, a number of presentation slides have leaked, they originate from MSI and shows some numbers based on a laptop with the pending Core i7-9750H and GeForce GTX 1650....
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Marketing Materials Appear - has 4 GB GDDR5 - 02/26/2019 05:32 PM
Little is save on the web, and it appears that some marketing collateral has appeared on the RT and Tensor'less GeForce GTX 1650, which is rumored to launch next month. Judging from the leak, the ca...
MoH marketing director explains 'Taliban' removal - 10/18/2010 10:19 AM
Medal of Honor is available now and there may still be people who have some questions regarding the name change of 'Taliban' to the slightly more politically correct 'Opposing Force' (a term largely u...
NiColaoS
Senior Member
Posts: 643
Joined: 2011-01-17
Senior Member
Posts: 643
Joined: 2011-01-17
#5777280 Posted on: 04/07/2020 09:09 PM
Even the i5 10400 which is dirt cheap has hyper threading, 6+6 cores. Especially if they will release an i5 10400F, we're talking about 170 euros. Not bad at all. My only problem to make the jump is the M/b. I have Z390 with an i7 9700K. I'd like a Z490 with an i7 10700KF. And even a dirt cheap PC with an i5 10400F with onboard graphics for movies/series/YouTube/Browsing etc. And both PCs with DDR4 at 2933Mhz.
Now I work my PC dual channel and while the pair is rated at 3,2Ghz, I run it at 2,67Ghz CL 14-14-34-1T-374 with 1,250V instead of 1,350V ( 3,2Ghz ).
Im sure tdp is useless when it comes to Intel, thats a 200W 10core cpu that costs more than 500Eur while 8core is nothing but a 9900k with a different name. But hey, there is also a overpriced 6core that have HT now, what a joke.
Even the i5 10400 which is dirt cheap has hyper threading, 6+6 cores. Especially if they will release an i5 10400F, we're talking about 170 euros. Not bad at all. My only problem to make the jump is the M/b. I have Z390 with an i7 9700K. I'd like a Z490 with an i7 10700KF. And even a dirt cheap PC with an i5 10400F with onboard graphics for movies/series/YouTube/Browsing etc. And both PCs with DDR4 at 2933Mhz.
Now I work my PC dual channel and while the pair is rated at 3,2Ghz, I run it at 2,67Ghz CL 14-14-34-1T-374 with 1,250V instead of 1,350V ( 3,2Ghz ).
NiColaoS
Senior Member
Posts: 643
Joined: 2011-01-17
Senior Member
Posts: 643
Joined: 2011-01-17
#5777283 Posted on: 04/07/2020 09:16 PM
Yeah sorry about that, I jumped to some conclusions. Can definitely relate though, I jumped from a 4.9GHz 2600k and can't say I've seen any improvement in heavily cpu-bottlenecked games (in my case old MMOs basically). Multithreaded stuff went through the roof as expected.
I'd say upgrading starts being worth it for games if you're still on 4 cores without hyperthreading. Basically the i5s from a few gens ago (7600k) are starting to suffer from what I gather.
It's fair to say after the legendrary Sandy Bridge, the single thread improvement is not noticable to the average joe.
Yeah sorry about that, I jumped to some conclusions. Can definitely relate though, I jumped from a 4.9GHz 2600k and can't say I've seen any improvement in heavily cpu-bottlenecked games (in my case old MMOs basically). Multithreaded stuff went through the roof as expected.
I'd say upgrading starts being worth it for games if you're still on 4 cores without hyperthreading. Basically the i5s from a few gens ago (7600k) are starting to suffer from what I gather.
It's fair to say after the legendrary Sandy Bridge, the single thread improvement is not noticable to the average joe.
Dazz
Senior Member
Posts: 909
Joined: 2001-08-12
Senior Member
Posts: 909
Joined: 2001-08-12
#5777316 Posted on: 04/07/2020 11:06 PM
Whats with all the turbo names, single core turbo, max turbo 3.0 then Thermal Velocity Boost it's just gibberish for the sake of gibberish if max core is 5.3GHz then thats it's max turbo why bother including 5.1 and 5.2GHz it's just max crap slapped on a box just for the hell of it.
Whats with all the turbo names, single core turbo, max turbo 3.0 then Thermal Velocity Boost it's just gibberish for the sake of gibberish if max core is 5.3GHz then thats it's max turbo why bother including 5.1 and 5.2GHz it's just max crap slapped on a box just for the hell of it.
Venix
Senior Member
Posts: 1534
Joined: 2016-08-01
Senior Member
Posts: 1534
Joined: 2016-08-01
#5777359 Posted on: 04/08/2020 07:31 AM
Did you forget the fx 9590 ?
the 8 core .....or 4 module cpu ...what ever does not matter if it was real 8 core or not but it was consuming 200 watts and was pumped to 5ghz .... anyone notice any similarity there ?
Intel is doing what AMD did for long time with videocards, trying to keep relevant by increasing TDP to the roof.. AMD failed - sales very bad, Intel will too.
Did you forget the fx 9590 ?
the 8 core .....or 4 module cpu ...what ever does not matter if it was real 8 core or not but it was consuming 200 watts and was pumped to 5ghz .... anyone notice any similarity there ?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 954
Joined: 2010-08-24
Yeah sorry about that, I jumped to some conclusions. Can definitely relate though, I jumped from a 4.9GHz 2600k and can't say I've seen any improvement in heavily cpu-bottlenecked games (in my case old MMOs basically). Multithreaded stuff went through the roof as expected.
I'd say upgrading starts being worth it for games if you're still on 4 cores without hyperthreading. Basically the i5s from a few gens ago (7600k) are starting to suffer from what I gather.