MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Marketing slides confirm Core i9-10900K, i7-10700K and i5-10600K
Well, it's not exactly a secret as to what to expect with Comet lake for Desktop, the difference however is that some leaked slides that do seem to originate from intel confirm some processors and core counts.
So here is the thing, over the weekend some slides of top three Comet lake models have appeared in Intel's upcoming line of desktop processors. The images partially confirm previously leaked specifications. The slides posted by VideoCardz confirm that the Core i9 gets ten cores. The i7 and i5 have eight and six cores, respectively. The three processors all have hyperthreading. The top model goes up to 5.3GHz with Thermal Velocity Boost.
The flagship proc would be the Core i9-10900K with ten cores and hyperthreading, where a single core would go up to 5.3 GHz with Thermal Velocity Boost. All cores clock looks to be 4.9 GHz would be possible, although this is not confirmed in the slides. A Core i7-10700K with eight cores and sixteen threads would lock in at of 5.1 GHz on a single core. There is also an unlocked Core i5 from the party and the 10600K. The six cores and twelve threads will run a maximum of 4.8 GHz. Intel reportedly announced the processors on April 30. Currently, the processor deck would show to be something like this:
| CPU | Cores / Threads | Base Clock | Single Core Turbo | Max Turbo 3.0 | All Core Turbo | Thermal Velocity Boost | TDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| i9-10900K | 10C / 20T | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 5.3 / 4.9 GHz | 125W |
| i9-10900KF | 10C / 20T | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 5.3 / 4.9 GHz | 125W |
| i9-10900 | 10C / 20T | 2.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | 5.2 / 4.6 GHz | 65W |
| i9-10900F | 10C / 20T | 2.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | 5.2 / 4.6 GHz | 65W |
| i7-10700K | 8C / 16T | 3.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz | TBA | 125W |
| i7-10700KF | 8C / 16T | 3.8 GHz | 5.0 GHz | 5.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz | TBA | 125W |
| i7-10700 | 8C / 16T | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i7-10700F | 8C / 16T | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i5-10600K | 6C / 12T | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz | TBA | 4.5 GHz | TBA | 125W |
| i5-10600KF | 6C / 12T | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz | TBA | 4.5 GHz | TBA | 125W |
| i5-10600 | 6C / 12T | 3.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz | TBA | 4.4 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i5-10500 | 6C / 12T | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz | TBA | 4.2 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i5-10400 | 6C / 12T | 2.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz | TBA | 4.0 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i5-10400F | 6C / 12T | 2.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz | TBA | 4.0 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i3-10320 | 4C / 8T | 3.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz | TBA | 4.4 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i3-10300 | 4C / 8T | 3.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz | TBA | 4.2 GHz | TBA | 65W |
| i3-10100 | 4C / 8T | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz | TBA | 4.1 GHz | TBA | 65W |
Xe GPU marketing managers Chris Hook and Heather Lennon leave Intel - 11/28/2019 03:10 PM
You've heard us writing about Chris Hook a couple of times already, he followed Raja Koduri towards Intel and was responsible for all AMD Marketing GPU related, with a similar position at Intel. At...
Intel snatches more AMD staff for its Xe GPU team, Heather Lennon from AMD RTG Digital Marketing - 04/09/2019 08:33 AM
Ever since a year or so, it's been a bit of a mud-fight among Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA. It pretty much started when Raja Koduri from AMD (leader of the AMD RTG team) made a move towards Intel to develo...
Intel Core i7-9750H and GeForce GTX 1650 Perfs leaks though marketing material - 04/08/2019 11:56 AM
In the Asia region, a number of presentation slides have leaked, they originate from MSI and shows some numbers based on a laptop with the pending Core i7-9750H and GeForce GTX 1650....
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Marketing Materials Appear - has 4 GB GDDR5 - 02/26/2019 05:32 PM
Little is save on the web, and it appears that some marketing collateral has appeared on the RT and Tensor'less GeForce GTX 1650, which is rumored to launch next month. Judging from the leak, the ca...
MoH marketing director explains 'Taliban' removal - 10/18/2010 10:19 AM
Medal of Honor is available now and there may still be people who have some questions regarding the name change of 'Taliban' to the slightly more politically correct 'Opposing Force' (a term largely u...
nizzen
Senior Member
Posts: 1287
Joined: 2005-08-05
Senior Member
Posts: 1287
Joined: 2005-08-05
#5777069 Posted on: 04/07/2020 08:46 AM
Buying z490 asus Apex, and overclock the 10 core to the "moon"
Benchmarking with binned b-die memory and 2080ti.
That is "work" for a couple of months. Then wait for next gen gpu's, and repeat the benchmarks.
New hardware is fun toys, nothing more :p
What the name or color is, I don't care. I benchmarking them all
Buying z490 asus Apex, and overclock the 10 core to the "moon"
Benchmarking with binned b-die memory and 2080ti.
That is "work" for a couple of months. Then wait for next gen gpu's, and repeat the benchmarks.
New hardware is fun toys, nothing more :p
What the name or color is, I don't care. I benchmarking them all
xIcarus
Senior Member
Posts: 954
Joined: 2010-08-24
Senior Member
Posts: 954
Joined: 2010-08-24
#5777089 Posted on: 04/07/2020 09:30 AM
So you basically made a purchase with unrealistic expectations, didn't research before purchasing and it's now the product's fault.
I don't wanna sound like an asshole but you've got nobody to blame but yourself. It is well known and documented that the difference in gaming isn't there compared to Intel, it's multithreaded where the difference lies.
Next time do some research.
I have bought 3900x for $418 and honestly there is nothing special about that CPU. Compared to i7 7820x I have overclocked to 4.7Ghz, I find that I just wasted money for mobo and 3900x because performance wise didn't gain anything except for Cinebench I do not play or use. Not saying that Ryzen is bad CPU but nothing impressive about it...seen that level of performance with Intel for the past 3-4 years.
So you basically made a purchase with unrealistic expectations, didn't research before purchasing and it's now the product's fault.
I don't wanna sound like an asshole but you've got nobody to blame but yourself. It is well known and documented that the difference in gaming isn't there compared to Intel, it's multithreaded where the difference lies.
Next time do some research.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 14946
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 14946
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5777093 Posted on: 04/07/2020 09:41 AM
Im sure tdp is useless when it comes to Intel, thats a 200W 10core cpu that costs more than 500Eur while 8core is nothing but a 9900k with a different name. But hey, there is also a overpriced 6core that have HT now, what a joke.
Im sure tdp is useless when it comes to Intel, thats a 200W 10core cpu that costs more than 500Eur while 8core is nothing but a 9900k with a different name. But hey, there is also a overpriced 6core that have HT now, what a joke.
Ricepudding
Senior Member
Posts: 755
Joined: 2017-02-17
Senior Member
Posts: 755
Joined: 2017-02-17
#5777110 Posted on: 04/07/2020 10:22 AM
Even after, when we all know exactly how Zen2 products are doing - and performing, we still have this conveyor belt of trash talk. Pathetic.
haha! I mean in some ways hes partly true I guess, Zen2 has no bells and whistes on the front (least if you just look at performance alone), but boy pop the hood and you get some of the best price to performance in a long time, including lower thermals, less power draw, typically more cores for similar or less price than intel, sadly not the best overclockers but the IPC is amazing... Just wonder if people get these chips thinking it will double their performance or something???
Even after, when we all know exactly how Zen2 products are doing - and performing, we still have this conveyor belt of trash talk. Pathetic.
haha! I mean in some ways hes partly true I guess, Zen2 has no bells and whistes on the front (least if you just look at performance alone), but boy pop the hood and you get some of the best price to performance in a long time, including lower thermals, less power draw, typically more cores for similar or less price than intel, sadly not the best overclockers but the IPC is amazing... Just wonder if people get these chips thinking it will double their performance or something???
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 244
Joined: 2016-10-19
Well, bang on cue...and consistent as ever. I'm sure your Intel paymaster will be proud.
3900x - "nothing special about that CPU"..."I find that I just wasted money for mobo and 3900x"..."seen that level of performance with Intel for the past 3-4 years"
...Pretty damning!
And, also on cue...the back-up...
Even after, when we all know exactly how Zen2 products are doing - and performing, we still have this conveyor belt of trash talk. Pathetic.