be quiet! Dark Rock TF2 review
Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs
Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
G.Skill TridentZ Royal Elite DDR4 3600 MHz CL14 review
Listing of Core i9 and Core i7 hexacores for laptops surface online
A long list of mobile processors has surfaced online, the list entails Coffee Lake-H and Coffee Lake-S processors intended for laptops. Intel is to offer a tweakable Core i9 laptop processor with six cores. A new Core i5-8650K desktop SKU is also listed.
The listing was published over at Anandtech, who spotted it at release update nite from AIDA. The Core i3 series will become quad-0cores, the i5 series hexa-cores and the i7 series hex-cores with hyper-threading (SMT). The HK denominator on the Core i9 processor is indicative of an unlocked processor. These processors get a 45 Watt TDP.
On the list Coffee Lake-S are also present, bringing the total number of procs (desktop and laptop) towards 46. On the desktop side, worthy a spot is the Core i5-8650K. A new tweakable (unlocked) proc. Have a peek at the listing, courtesy of Anandtech.
| Intel 8th Generation Mobile Processors Coffee Lake-H |
|||||
| Specifications are not confirmed |
Cores | Base Freq |
Turbo Freq |
L3 | Nominal TDP (PL1) |
| Core i9-8950HK | 6 / 12 | ? | ? | 12 MB | 45 W |
| Core i7-8850H | 6 / 12 | ? | ? | 12 MB | 45 W |
| Core i7-8750H | 6 / 12 | ? | ? | 12 MB | 45 W |
| Core i5-8400H | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | 45 W |
| Core i3-8300H | 4 / 4 | ? | ? | 8 MB | 45 W |
| Intel 8th Generation Desktop Processors Coffee Lake-S |
|||||||
| Specifications not confirmed except * |
Cores | Base Freq |
Turbo Freq |
L3 | TDP | List Price |
|
| Core i7 | |||||||
| Core i7-8700K | * | 6 / 12 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 12 MB | 95 W | $359 |
| Core i7-8700 | * | 6 / 12 | 3.2 | 4.6 | 12 MB | 65 W | $303 |
| Core i7-8700B | 6 / 12 | ? | ? | 12 MB | ? | $303 | |
| Core i7-8700T | 6 / 12 | ? | ? | 12 MB | 35 W | $303 | |
| Core i7-8670 | 6 / 12 | ? | ? | 12 MB | 65 W | ? | |
| Core i7-8670T | 6 / 12 | ? | ? | 12 MB | 35 W | ? | |
| Core i5 | |||||||
| Core i5-8650K | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | ? | ? | |
| Core i5-8650 | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | 65 W | ? | |
| Core i5-8600K | * | 6 / 6 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 9 MB | 95 W | $257 |
| Core i5-8550 | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | 65 W | ? | |
| Core i5-8500 | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | 65 W | ? | |
| Core i5-8500B | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | ? | ? | |
| Core i5-8500T | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | 35 W | ? | |
| Core i5-8420 | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | 65 W | ? | |
| Core i5-8420T | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | 35 W | ? | |
| Core i5-8400 | * | 6 / 6 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 9 MB | 65 W | $182 |
| Core i5-8400B | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | ? | $182 | |
| Core i5-8400T | 6 / 6 | ? | ? | 9 MB | 35 W | $182 | |
| Core i3 | |||||||
| Core i3-8350K | * | 4 / 4 | 4.0 | 8 MB | 91 W | $168 | |
| Core i3-8320 | 4 / 4 | ? | 8 MB | 65 W | ? | ||
| Core i3-8320T | 4 / 4 | ? | 8 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Core i3-8300T | 4 / 4 | ? | 8 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Core i3-8120 | 4 / 4 | ? | 6 MB | 65 W | ? | ||
| Core i3-8120T | 4 / 4 | ? | 6 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Core i3-8100 | * | 4 / 4 | 3.6 | 6 MB | 65 W | $117 | |
| Core i3-8100T | 4 / 4 | ? | 6 MB | 35 W | $117 | ||
| Core i3-8020 | 4 / 4 | ? | 6 MB | 65 W | ? | ||
| Core i3-8020T | 4 / 4 | ? | 6 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Core i3-8000 | 4 / 4 | ? | 6 MB | 65 W | ? | ||
| Core i3-8000T | 4 / 4 | ? | 6 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Pentium Gold | |||||||
| Pentium Gold G5620 | 2 / 4 | ? | 3 MB | ? | ? | ||
| Pentium Gold G5620T | 2 / 4 | ? | 3 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Pentium Gold G5600 | 2 / 4 | ? | 3 MB | ? | ? | ||
| Pentium Gold G5500 | 2 / 4 | ? | 3 MB | ? | ? | ||
| Pentium Gold G5500T | 2 / 4 | ? | 3 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Pentium Gold G5420 | 2 / 4 | ? | 3 MB | ? | ? | ||
| Pentium Gold G5420T | 2 / 4 | ? | 3 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Pentium Gold G5400 | 2 / 4 | ? | 3 MB | ? | ? | ||
| Pentium Gold G5400T | 2 / 4 | ? | 3 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Celeron | |||||||
| Celeron G4950 | 2 / 2 | ? | 2 MB | ? | ? | ||
| Celeron G4930 | 2 / 2 | ? | 2 MB | ? | ? | ||
| Celeron G4930T | 2 / 2 | ? | 2 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
| Celeron G4920 | 2 / 2 | ? | 2 MB | ? | ? | ||
| Celeron G4900 | 2 / 2 | ? | 2 MB | ? | ? | ||
| Celeron G4900T | 2 / 2 | ? | 2 MB | 35 W | ? | ||
AMD GPU Linux driver patches is listing seven Vega 10 IDs - 03/21/2017 08:53 AM
100 Linux patches amounting to over fourty thousand lines of code was sent out today for review in order to provide "Vega 10" support within the Linux AMDGPU DRM driver. ...
GeForce GTX 980 starts listing in pricewatch engines - 09/06/2014 10:59 AM
LOL - okay so i just performed a search on GeForce GTX 980 at geizhals.at, an EU based price-watch engine. It started listing GeForce GTX 980. Few details are listed however there are some interest...
Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition starts listing for €954 - 08/25/2014 03:44 PM
If you look around a bit at price-watch engines you will notice that Haswell-E already is being listed. Polish based Kombo is listing the 8-core flagship model with specs and everything. The processor...
AMD Radeon R9 290 starts listing in price search engines - 11/04/2013 10:01 AM
AMD should be releasing the AMD Radeon R9 290 non X model by tomorrow. The price however was still unknown but everybody was expecting this product to be sub 500 EUR. EU based price search engine Gei...
OCZ Technology Obtains Favorable NASDAQ Listing Determination - 05/29/2013 08:04 AM
Really good news for OCZ. OCZ Technology Group today announced that on May 28, 2013 the Company received a determination from the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Panel (the "Panel") indicat...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5495698 Posted on: 11/26/2017 10:06 PM
Strange how there are no 4c/8t models. When it comes to x86-based laptops, I'd much rather have a 4c/8t over a 6c/6t. If this were ARM, I'd gladly take the extra cores, since ARM is a more efficient with idle cores.
I know I won't be getting any of these CL laptops if the CPUs are all going to be 45W.
Intel has been doing stuff like this for years. Dual core i7s with HT were pretty common. It boggled my mind why anyone bothered to buy one of those over an i5.
Strange how there are no 4c/8t models. When it comes to x86-based laptops, I'd much rather have a 4c/8t over a 6c/6t. If this were ARM, I'd gladly take the extra cores, since ARM is a more efficient with idle cores.
I know I won't be getting any of these CL laptops if the CPUs are all going to be 45W.
I don't like the use of the i9 moniker for only a 6 core hyper threaded CPU, it's a 'con' to use that moniker. Could do with being some consistency in terms of core count at least between desktop & mobile when it comes to i5/i7/i9 etc - I can deal with the core frequencies being different (lower) on the mobile CPUs but I think core count should retain some equality in terms of the series numbering between desktop & mobile.
Intel has been doing stuff like this for years. Dual core i7s with HT were pretty common. It boggled my mind why anyone bothered to buy one of those over an i5.
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2008-10-13
Senior Member
Posts: 3323
Joined: 2008-10-13
#5495731 Posted on: 11/27/2017 01:09 AM
Strange how there are no 4c/8t models. When it comes to x86-based laptops, I'd much rather have a 4c/8t over a 6c/6t. If this were ARM, I'd gladly take the extra cores, since ARM is a more efficient with idle cores.
I know I won't be getting any of these CL laptops if the CPUs are all going to be 45W.
Intel has been doing stuff like this for years. Dual core i7s with HT were pretty common. It boggled my mind why anyone bothered to buy one of those over an i5.
Just like when people bought i5 6XX which were dual cores with HT on 1156.
I had a buddy that didnt know much about computers. One of his idiot friends told him to buy an i7 laptop which had a dual core with HT. He said it would be better then an i5 because its an i7. I made him take it back the next day and get the i5 they had that actually was $85 less and actually had a better dedicated gpu. Personally, Intel has always been shady with that crap.
Strange how there are no 4c/8t models. When it comes to x86-based laptops, I'd much rather have a 4c/8t over a 6c/6t. If this were ARM, I'd gladly take the extra cores, since ARM is a more efficient with idle cores.
I know I won't be getting any of these CL laptops if the CPUs are all going to be 45W.
Intel has been doing stuff like this for years. Dual core i7s with HT were pretty common. It boggled my mind why anyone bothered to buy one of those over an i5.
Just like when people bought i5 6XX which were dual cores with HT on 1156.
I had a buddy that didnt know much about computers. One of his idiot friends told him to buy an i7 laptop which had a dual core with HT. He said it would be better then an i5 because its an i7. I made him take it back the next day and get the i5 they had that actually was $85 less and actually had a better dedicated gpu. Personally, Intel has always been shady with that crap.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6083
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5495735 Posted on: 11/27/2017 01:24 AM
Very true, though to my recollection there were no i7s when that series came out, so it didn't look like such a stupid product at the time.
Well, your buddy is a solid example of why Intel's marketing works. They're going to continue pulling this crap until they're put under the spotlight. Sadly, I've even seen IT professionals shoot for these i7 dual cores.
Personally, I'm fine with my i3-based laptop. Sure, there's no turbo speeds, but ever since Turbo Boost 3.0, turbo speeds are unappealing to me anyway. I'd rather have consistent and good battery life and lower fan speeds. Still has 2c/4t, but costs much less for a negligible performance loss in everyday tasks.
Just like when people bought i5 6XX which were dual cores with HT on 1156.
Very true, though to my recollection there were no i7s when that series came out, so it didn't look like such a stupid product at the time.
I had a buddy that didnt know much about computers. One of his idiot friends told him to buy an i7 laptop which had a dual core with HT. He said it would be better then an i5 because its an i7. I made him take it back the next day and get the i5 they had that actually was $85 less and actually had a better dedicated gpu. Personally, Intel has always been shady with that crap.
Well, your buddy is a solid example of why Intel's marketing works. They're going to continue pulling this crap until they're put under the spotlight. Sadly, I've even seen IT professionals shoot for these i7 dual cores.
Personally, I'm fine with my i3-based laptop. Sure, there's no turbo speeds, but ever since Turbo Boost 3.0, turbo speeds are unappealing to me anyway. I'd rather have consistent and good battery life and lower fan speeds. Still has 2c/4t, but costs much less for a negligible performance loss in everyday tasks.
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5495749 Posted on: 11/27/2017 02:47 AM
I actually didn't see much laptop performance being capped by slow CPU.
My top 3 reasons for slow laptop:
1) Low amount of RAM causes swapping, which causes massive lags when opening or switching between apps.
-> Add RAM (at least 4GB)
2) HDD. Laptop HDD's are really slow. Takes a while to load OS or apps.
-> Switch to SSD, also helps with swapping
3) Overheating. No matter how fast CPU is, once overheated it won't perform at all. i5 CPUs might actually perform better then i7 since they produce less heat and have lower chance to be affected by throttling.
-> Get CPU with less TDP and even lower clock speed if heat becomes an issue.
4 and 5 would be software issue and lack of GPU performance, still not CPU issue.
edit:
From article, even if still not confirmed I don't think it's possible to have 45W across all CPUs (from i3 to i9). Unless we double cut CPU clock once we add 2 times more cores.
I actually didn't see much laptop performance being capped by slow CPU.
My top 3 reasons for slow laptop:
1) Low amount of RAM causes swapping, which causes massive lags when opening or switching between apps.
-> Add RAM (at least 4GB)
2) HDD. Laptop HDD's are really slow. Takes a while to load OS or apps.
-> Switch to SSD, also helps with swapping
3) Overheating. No matter how fast CPU is, once overheated it won't perform at all. i5 CPUs might actually perform better then i7 since they produce less heat and have lower chance to be affected by throttling.
-> Get CPU with less TDP and even lower clock speed if heat becomes an issue.
4 and 5 would be software issue and lack of GPU performance, still not CPU issue.
edit:
From article, even if still not confirmed I don't think it's possible to have 45W across all CPUs (from i3 to i9). Unless we double cut CPU clock once we add 2 times more cores.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1553
Joined: 2012-10-07
I don't like the use of the i9 moniker for only a 6 core hyper threaded CPU, it's a 'con' to use that moniker. Could do with being some consistency in terms of core count at least between desktop & mobile when it comes to i5/i7/i9 etc - I can deal with the core frequencies being different (lower) on the mobile CPUs but I think core count should retain some equality in terms of the series numbering between desktop & mobile.
What makes it worse is that on the mobile front there's even inconsistency with the series numbering within it's own mobile sphere (when not even comparing to desktop). They have here 6 core hyperthreaded CPUs described as both i7 & i9 - there's not even any logical consistency here either.
On a positive note: good to have 6 core CPUs arriving in laptops!