Intel Core i9 9900KS processor review
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
ASUS PRIME X570 Pro review
ASUS ROG STRIX Scope keyboard review
GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 Super WTF review
ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT THICC III Ultra review
Promo: URcdkey Halloween sale Windows 10 Pro for 11$
LG To Launch 27UD58-B 27-Inch Ultra HD IPS Monitor at 499 USD
LG is about to launch a new 27-inch 4K LCD monitor, the 27UD58-B. Adopting an IPS panel, this new 27-inch LED-backlight monitor provides 3840 x 2160 4K native resolution, 1000:1 contrast ratio (DCR 5,000,000:1), 250 cd/m2 brightness, 5ms (GTG) response time and 178/178 degree viewing angles.
Apart from that, the 27UD58-B also comes with a number of advanced features including Black Stabilizer – to increase the visibility of the dark scenes, SUPER+ Resolution (super-resolution technology), Flicker-Safe function and Blue Light reduction function.
Specs are as follows of 27UD58-B.
| Product name | 27UD58-B |
|---|---|
| Screen size | 27 inches |
| Aspect ratio | 16: 9 |
| Panel Type | IPS (AH-IPS) |
| Surface treatment | Non-glare |
| Effective display area (width x height) | 597 × 336 (mm) |
| resolution | 3840 × 2160 |
| Pixel pitch | 0.1554 × 0.1554mm |
| Display color | About 1.07 billion colors |
| Viewing angle (horizontal / vertical) | 178 ° / 178 ° |
| Luminance | 250cd / m² |
| Contrast ratio | Up to 5,000,000: 1 (usually 1,000: 1) |
| Response time (ms) | 5ms (GTG) |
| Input | × 1 HDMI2.0 DisplayPort × 1 |
| Output | Stereo mini jack × 1 |
| Size | 633 × 464 × 202mm |
| weight | 5.6kg |
The monitor is also FreeSync compatible. For input ports, it provides 2x HDMI2.0 and 1x DisplayPort. The LG 27UD58-B is scheduled to hit the market from July 27th for 51,000 Yen (about $492).
MadGizmo
Senior Member
Posts: 1396
Joined: 2008-06-09
Senior Member
Posts: 1396
Joined: 2008-06-09
#5305828 Posted on: 07/14/2016 09:53 AM
Hilbert... A little booboo in the text: 51000 Yen is about 483.38 dollar. Not 4992 dollar.
Hilbert... A little booboo in the text: 51000 Yen is about 483.38 dollar. Not 4992 dollar.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36306
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36306
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5305830 Posted on: 07/14/2016 09:55 AM
But I like boobs ... fixed
Hilbert... A little booboo in the text:
But I like boobs ... fixed
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7143
Joined: 2005-08-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7143
Joined: 2005-08-10
#5305836 Posted on: 07/14/2016 10:00 AM
Definitely. I would personally prefer a 30" even for 1440p. But a 4K under 30", no way.
Imo too small for 4k. This size is more appropriate for 1440p.
Definitely. I would personally prefer a 30" even for 1440p. But a 4K under 30", no way.
Anarion
Senior Member
Posts: 13531
Joined: 2005-08-13
Senior Member
Posts: 13531
Joined: 2005-08-13
#5305841 Posted on: 07/14/2016 10:09 AM
Naah... I'd rather see scaling improved. I want to make use of that higher PPI for better text rendering, not to gain more space. This is a perfect size for 4K.
Definitely. I would personally prefer a 30" even for 1440p. But a 4K under 30", no way.
Naah... I'd rather see scaling improved. I want to make use of that higher PPI for better text rendering, not to gain more space. This is a perfect size for 4K.
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 2710
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2710
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5305843 Posted on: 07/14/2016 10:17 AM
I have Asus PG278Q ROG Swift, its a 27 screen, and honestly after using it for some time, id love it to be bigger. 30at least, 32-34 Curved IPS would be perfect. But oh well I can keep dreaming, and my wallet is shouting at me again.
Definitely. I would personally prefer a 30" even for 1440p. But a 4K under 30", no way.
I have Asus PG278Q ROG Swift, its a 27 screen, and honestly after using it for some time, id love it to be bigger. 30at least, 32-34 Curved IPS would be perfect. But oh well I can keep dreaming, and my wallet is shouting at me again.
vazup
Senior Member
Posts: 289
Joined: 2013-09-05
Senior Member
Posts: 289
Joined: 2013-09-05
#5305847 Posted on: 07/14/2016 10:29 AM
Exactly this! I want to get the same awesome looking monitor screens as we do on mobile phones! 720p screen on a mobile has way more ppi than a 24" 4K monitor but a 1440p mobile screen looks soooo much better than a 720p one so it does matter. We only need to get better text and font scaling.
Naah... I'd rather see scaling improved. I want to make use of that higher PPI for better text rendering, not to gain more space. This is a perfect size for 4K.
Exactly this! I want to get the same awesome looking monitor screens as we do on mobile phones! 720p screen on a mobile has way more ppi than a 24" 4K monitor but a 1440p mobile screen looks soooo much better than a 720p one so it does matter. We only need to get better text and font scaling.
Witcher29
Senior Member
Posts: 1111
Joined: 2015-06-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1111
Joined: 2015-06-02
#5305864 Posted on: 07/14/2016 11:28 AM
To small u lose detail by it to much.
Naah... I'd rather see scaling improved. I want to make use of that higher PPI for better text rendering, not to gain more space. This is a perfect size for 4K.
To small u lose detail by it to much.
0blivious
Senior Member
Posts: 2580
Joined: 2006-04-25
Senior Member
Posts: 2580
Joined: 2006-04-25
#5305922 Posted on: 07/14/2016 01:46 PM
+1
I have a 43" 4K set and I would say below 32" is way too small. Major text issues will occur in many games as they aren't ready for 4K (no scaling).
Imo too small for 4k. This size is more appropriate for 1440p.
+1
I have a 43" 4K set and I would say below 32" is way too small. Major text issues will occur in many games as they aren't ready for 4K (no scaling).
Humanoid_1
Senior Member
Posts: 947
Joined: 2009-10-14
Senior Member
Posts: 947
Joined: 2009-10-14
#5305929 Posted on: 07/14/2016 01:54 PM
27 - 32 inch for 4k is what I'm after with 144Hz and some kind of Freesync motion blur reduction system. Perhaps in some form panel that improves on the failings of current IPS ones. OLED is way to expensive....
Personally I can extremely easily see detail and would find 4k in a 27" panel to still be lacking in an ideal world, even if still very nice compared to the shameful 1080 panels @ 60Hz we have been subjected to for so long.
- (I've been holding out for an ideal panel too long now lol )
Probably going to buy a stop gap 1440 144Hz IPS panel in the next day or so, then hope for a really nice release next year maybe with good Quantum Dot tech included.
27 - 32 inch for 4k is what I'm after with 144Hz and some kind of Freesync motion blur reduction system. Perhaps in some form panel that improves on the failings of current IPS ones. OLED is way to expensive....
Personally I can extremely easily see detail and would find 4k in a 27" panel to still be lacking in an ideal world, even if still very nice compared to the shameful 1080 panels @ 60Hz we have been subjected to for so long.
- (I've been holding out for an ideal panel too long now lol )
Probably going to buy a stop gap 1440 144Hz IPS panel in the next day or so, then hope for a really nice release next year maybe with good Quantum Dot tech included.
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7143
Joined: 2005-08-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7143
Joined: 2005-08-10
#5305932 Posted on: 07/14/2016 01:59 PM
Yeah i'm on Dell U2711 for ages now, and while it is perfect ppi size/resolution, I still wouldn't mind a 30" 1440p high refresh rate monitor.
I have Asus PG278Q ROG Swift, its a 27 screen, and honestly after using it for some time, id love it to be bigger. 30at least, 32-34 Curved IPS would be perfect. But oh well I can keep dreaming, and my wallet is shouting at me again.
Yeah i'm on Dell U2711 for ages now, and while it is perfect ppi size/resolution, I still wouldn't mind a 30" 1440p high refresh rate monitor.
Anarion
Senior Member
Posts: 13531
Joined: 2005-08-13
Senior Member
Posts: 13531
Joined: 2005-08-13
#5305955 Posted on: 07/14/2016 02:44 PM
No I don't. 1080p 23" screen is horrible to look at. The PPI should be at least twice than that. It would benefit font rendering a lot.
To small u lose detail by it to much.
No I don't. 1080p 23" screen is horrible to look at. The PPI should be at least twice than that. It would benefit font rendering a lot.
Witcher29
Senior Member
Posts: 1111
Joined: 2015-06-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1111
Joined: 2015-06-02
#5305968 Posted on: 07/14/2016 03:15 PM
For me and others its to small for gaming, 27inch 1440p is good and 32 inch for 4k or 34 inch is perfect.
No I don't. 1080p 23" screen is horrible to look at. The PPI should be at least twice than that. It would benefit font rendering a lot.
For me and others its to small for gaming, 27inch 1440p is good and 32 inch for 4k or 34 inch is perfect.
scoter man1
Senior Member
Posts: 4711
Joined: 2008-12-09
Senior Member
Posts: 4711
Joined: 2008-12-09
#5305997 Posted on: 07/14/2016 04:08 PM
Anarion be like
Anarion be like
JAMF72
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: 2015-03-25
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: 2015-03-25
#5306018 Posted on: 07/14/2016 04:56 PM
18mm bezels? Technology appears to be regressing where display housing is concerned.
We should be seeing 8mm bezels.
18mm bezels? Technology appears to be regressing where display housing is concerned.
We should be seeing 8mm bezels.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2710
Joined: 2014-10-20
Imo too small for 4k. This size is more appropriate for 1440p.