LG Gets Ready for 8K Quad UHD
And we say, not even in ten years it will reach the consumer market. LG is carefully pushing 8K Quad Ultra HD display technology, or is warming us up for it. 8K Quad Ultra HD will get a 7680 x 4320 pixels native resolution which is sixteen times your Full HF telly.
Since Japanese engineers first demonstrated high-resolution at the International Television Engineers Conference in 1981, the demand for high-quality content has continued to grow. The high-resolution display trend has already begun with Full-HD TVs being commonplace in homes and QHD (Quad High Definition) quality panels being adopted in smartphones with screens that are the size of the palm a person’s hand. The high-resolution contents that provide realistic images and a true sense of immersion have now moved beyond 4K and the focus has now turned to super-high-resolution 8K.
The World is Turning to 8K
It is not difficult to hear the call for bigger and clearer images from everywhere around the world. When the BBC took on the broadcasting of the 2012 Olympics, they said, ‘Since 8K resolution is the highest resolution that the human eye is capable of seeing, it will put an end to the resolution discussion,’ predicting that ‘ultimately, 8K images will overtake the market.’
It has become clear that Japan is planning to launch an 8K SHV test broadcast and then promptly restructure the UHD service. Apple has also announced that they will release the ‘iMac 8K’ with a super-high resolution display later this year. Korea is also preparing to offer an 8K service demonstration at the 2018 Pyeongchang Winter Olympics. LG Display displayed a new beacon of the 8K era by revealing their 98-inch 8K Color Prime Ultra HDTV at CES 2015.
The Resolution and Pixels of 8K
How will 8K improve image quality over what we are already experiencing? Let’s take a closer look through resolution which is used as the concept to explain image quality.
The screen depicted in the image above is a 7,680 x 4,320 resolution screen. It is 2 times the resolution of a 4K screen but in actuality, the number of pixels is 4 times that of 4K which is 16 times more than Full HD. But what is the correlation between resolution and pixels? In short, by increasing the number of pixels on a screen, the viewer can enjoy a clearer picture.
For example, a 5-inch HD resolution smartphone screen with 900,000 pixels boasts higher image quality than a 5-inch SD resolution smartphone screen with 340,000 pixels. Likewise, FHD (1,920×1,080) provides clearer image than HD, and resolution continues to increase with QHD (3,840×2,160) and UHD (4,096×2,160). PPI (Pixel per Inch) is a term used to describe how many pixels are in an inch of screen and also represents the density of pixels. In order to increase the size of a display while maintaining the same resolution, the PPI must also be increased.
LG Display, Preparing for the 8K Era
LG Display has already succeeded in making super-high resolution a reality with the revealing of their 98-inch 8K UHD display at CES 2015. LG Display managed to improve the brightness of its 55-inch 8K UHD panel with 7,680×4320 resolution and 500nit by implementing M+ panel technology, which adds a white pixel to the existing RGB sub-pixel structure. IPS technology was also applied to make an impressive panel that has the advantage of high resolution and a wide viewing angle even on large scale screens.
With these developments, LG Display has expanded the Ultra-HD (UHD) lineup and is showing off diverse range of screen sizes with super-high resolution displays such as 8K. There are also high expectations in the commercial signage market as there is a need for clear large-scale high resolution screens. Look for great strides to be made by LG Display in the super-high resolution display era.
Member
Posts: 74
Joined: 2010-11-27
I just picked up a 55LG EA8800 OLED. Right now content is 1080p, so 4K is useless. If you want the best 1080p has to offer, then its OLED.
Senior Member
Posts: 915
Joined: 2006-04-13
HAHAHA
This is just money send out of the window:
1) We don't even have 4k programs (some are testing them) to much bandwidth needed for them (we need to send some more satellites in space, or find better compressions), or content (to few) !!!
2) Still to many SD channels (money make the difference) , not even HD not to say FullHD.......
3) To few games that we can play at 4k (we need to invest for them...)
So this is just marketing, because when we will have 8K channels and content then maybe we will have other compression formats that will not be compatible with the 8k TV's to date.
So throw your money at them if you don't have anything else to spend them, but you will not use your PC at 50% of his capacity !!!
By the way 8K like 4k , FullHD and HD TV's need to upscale the SD video to his native resolution and the bigger his resolution the more ugly the video will look, not to mention that if you got a big set 70+ you will see an even ugly video so.........
Go get them while they are still warm.







Senior Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: 2012-04-30
Its quite obvious that you and many other have no clu.
anyone claiming that 4k does not make sense, because there is no 4k cable, please destroy your 1080p tv right now.
There is no 1080p@50Mbit signal coming in for cable/satellite, so its ok to watch an upscaled signal on a FHD set, but not if its 4k?!
Fact is, sony is doing upscaling to 2/4k for more than a decade in almost every theater.
Anyone complaint about the upscaled image quality on the 30-50ft screens? No?
Fact is, sony has (near) 4k IQ with a FHD signal on a bd. Same thing for gaming. I dont need to run it in 4k on the pc, 1080 is fine, tv upscales.
How many people would spend 5000$ on a 65in, if they could NOT see a difference compared to the 60 FHD i have hanging next to it?
If someone says they dont want to buy a new tv or dont want to spend the money, fine, but dont tell me there is no difference between a corvette and a station wagen unless im on the race track (especially if "you" have never driven one).
Fact is, all XBR models from 2012 and up, can cover 100-130% of srgb.
Fact is, oleds have burn-in problems like plasma, loose brightness within a few years (when its already just 30-50% of what led tvs can do, even when new).
Senior Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: 2012-04-30
the best oled vs sony XBR. dont see anything being better on oled...
http://www.bilder-hochladen.net/files/big/iyhi-6-1679.jpg
http://www.bilder-hochladen.net/files/big/iyhi-7-8f14.jpg
Senior Member
Posts: 6952
Joined: 2008-10-27
Yea, so to make it basic, if we take a strobe light, and set it away at 10 flashes per second, we'll see the individual flashes, as we increase the speed, at some point around (you say 20) 20-30 flashes per second, we will no longer see each flash, but the lamp will appear to be a steady constant light instead of a strobe
I feel as if we can see above that rate though, old CRTs would still appear to strobe at 40-50Hz iirc
Old CRTs and florescent lighting at 60hz is very easy to see the flickering. What minimizes it to a large extent is the persistence of the phosphors used. Testing has show pilots being able to identify aircraft with an image flashed for 1/220th of a second. Secondarily, the eyes do not see in 'FPS'. It's a continuous process.