Leaked Intel Alder Lake slides indicate support for PCIe 5.0 and DDR5
Over the weekend a slide leaked on the Intel's pending Alder Lake, you know the BIG.little core design processors that will follow later this year, after Rocket Lake. The slide indicates the 10nm processors will receive support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0
Intel itself has indicated a release late this year for this 10nm lga1700 socket processor series for notebooks and desktops. However leaked marketing slides published by VideoCardz include showing a thing or two more. Performance in single-threads could be 'up to twenty percent better. Note, It's not indicated what intel is actually comparing to, (Rocket Lake or Tiger Lake)
The slides also show that multithreaded performance would be 'up to twice' better as well as usage of Gracemont cores. Alder Lake CPUs would get two types of cores. In addition to faster Golden Cove cores with hyperthreading, the CPUs also get energy-efficient Gracemont cores without hyperthreading, which should improve multithreaded performance. The CPUs will utilize hardware-controlled scheduling to distribute tasks between the different cores.
Alder Lake will be get up to eight Golden Cove cores and up-to eight Gracemont cores, so that's in one with previous leaks we've seen, 16 cores and 24 threads. Interesting to notice is that Alder Lake CPUs have sixteen PCIe 5.0 and four PCIe 4.0 lanes. System memory-wise Alder Lake supports both DDR5 and DDR4 memory.
Intel confirmed the arrival of Alder Lake at CES in January but shared only a few details at the time.
Intel Core i9-11900K ES and Core i7-11700 ES prices leaked in china - 12/28/2020 10:38 AM
Over at Chiphell prices of ES based Core i9-11900K ES and Core i7-11700 have popped up. Take them with a grain of salt of course, but considering the leaker also has been posting CPU-Z screenshots of ...
Leaked Intel roadmap shows 7000P Pro and 700P BGA SSDs - 09/20/2018 06:44 PM
There is a newly leaked roadmap on the loose in Asia, it is showing pending SSDs and mention some unannounced Intel Pro 7000P SSDs (intended for the business market. The intersting thing here is t...
Intel X-series processors Specs leaked incl Core i9 7980 XE - 07/29/2017 02:41 AM
Yesterday a new slide surfaced on the web, detailing the entire Core X lineup from Intel, the interesting thing here is that the specs shown include the full line-up, up-to the 14, 16 and 18-core part...
Leaked Intel boxed CPU roadmap (all slides) - 07/09/2013 08:16 AM
A Russian IT distributor has leaked an Intel roadmap of boxed CPUs. The PDF was authored on the first of July by a technical marketing engineer from Intel. The document contains updates on information...
Leaked Intel slides show 8-core CPUs, AVX - 08/15/2008 09:05 AM
Surely it is not exactly the biggest secret in the world. But Intel's upcoming processor generations will double the number of cores per chip and add a brand new language for specialized code, accordi...
Senior Member
Posts: 15700
Joined: 2018-03-21
thats not how it works.
the slower cores aren't x86.
Member
Posts: 26
Joined: 2018-03-09
I mean, if 1080p (or heck, even 1440p) gaming is your only concern, then there's no exciting news if you have bought any new CPU in last 2/3 years. Adopting new hardware has always been expensive too, so nothing new here. If there is any discussion, it would be only about if the performance improvement can justify the premium we pay for it.
Senior Member
Posts: 8103
Joined: 2014-09-27
I would love to have proper standby like a console, where the computer can keep downloading etc. Of course that's on Windows, but I'm reading that AMD and motherboards might already start supporting Modern Standby. This architecture makes a lot of sense for something like this.
Senior Member
Posts: 450
Joined: 2013-04-05
Early DDR5 will be like early DDR4/3/2, nothing compared to the mature products. RAM frequency matters so little anyway compared to GPU and CPU, the industry has way bigger issues at the moment.
On-die L3 cache mitigates the impact of slower RAM, I suspect this will only get worse (better?) with future CPU generations.
Senior Member
Posts: 292
Joined: 2008-05-07
I would want one without the small, slower cores. Just the 8 faster cores would be ideal for a gaming rig. I don't want the scheduler assigning gaming tasks to slower cores. Also, DDR5 is going to be hilariously expensive at first I bet. I think I'll see how performance/price plays out. If these CPUs cost $600 and 32gb of DDR5 costs $500 then that's not exactly exciting in my book, especially when a $250 10700K will max any GPU and game for years to come over 1080p.