Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
Leaked Benchmarks Indicate IPC Rocket Lake-S to be slower than AMD Ryzen 5000
One of the primary benefits of the pending Rocket Lake-S series is the fact they're based on a new architecture, that architecture would offer better IPC. A website now has fired off tests at a Core i9 11900K measuring exactly that.
The end result is that, although an IPC increase definitely is measured, Ryzen 5000 remains to be the faster architecture. IPC byw ie the number of instruction-by-clock, indicative performance per core. The asia based reviewer compares the Core i9 11900K with the Ryzen 9 5950 and that reveals the existing Ryzen 5000 chips are about 6% to 10% faster than the Rocket Lake processors when both architectures run at 4 GHz and are limited to four cores and eight threads.
Assassin's Creed: Unity - New Leaked Beta Video - 08/26/2014 08:33 AM
nivek elia has leaked a new video from the closed beta phase of Assassin's Creed: Unity, showing 10 minutes of gameplay footage. ...
Radeon R9 290 Performance Figures Leaked by OCUK - 10/25/2013 11:41 AM
Though we can't be sure about the validity of these benchmarks, OCUK decided to leak the results for the Radeon R9-290 (non x model). In a chart where they convientiently 'blur' the 290 results. T...
Leaked Benchmark of Intel Core i7 3770K - 02/02/2012 01:53 PM
Intel's most CPU from the upcoming Ivy Bridge collection is going to be known as Core i7 3770K and has been benchmarked, apparently. The benchmarking results that have made their way to the Internet o...
Windows 7 Build 6956 leaked by an attendee at WinHEC China - 12/08/2008 01:13 PM
Windows7Center reports that the impossible has been done again and pirates all over the world are busy trying to obtain the more updated build of Windows 7- build 6956. Just a day after WinHEC China b...
mikeysg
Senior Member
Posts: 2998
Joined: 2003-05-13
Senior Member
Posts: 2998
Joined: 2003-05-13
#5899496 Posted on: 03/26/2021 06:17 AM
So true! I'd stated in other threads/forums that I can actually get an RX6900 XT or an RTX 3090 from some of the brick and mortar shops in the local tech mall. But, if you're aiming for the RX 6800/6800 XT or the RTX 3080/3070/3060 Ti, then you're outta luck. I've been informed that the recently released RX 6700 XT is also available (a guy posted that he'd gotten a Nitro+ RX 6700 XT for 741USD (present exchange rate), that's a smidgen above 50% price premium!!!).
Uh... 3090 is not the problem. I could order one immediately and get it in a couple of days from the store's own stock. I could even choose from several models. It's everything below the 3090 that's nonexistent outside of miners' caves and a few lucky real people here and there.
So true! I'd stated in other threads/forums that I can actually get an RX6900 XT or an RTX 3090 from some of the brick and mortar shops in the local tech mall. But, if you're aiming for the RX 6800/6800 XT or the RTX 3080/3070/3060 Ti, then you're outta luck. I've been informed that the recently released RX 6700 XT is also available (a guy posted that he'd gotten a Nitro+ RX 6700 XT for 741USD (present exchange rate), that's a smidgen above 50% price premium!!!).
kapu
Senior Member
Posts: 5294
Joined: 2006-12-22
Senior Member
Posts: 5294
Joined: 2006-12-22
#5899540 Posted on: 03/26/2021 10:22 AM
I don't care about stock, never did
My 5900x is far from stock, and drawing about 320w full load
I'm between , im all in for extra free performance that i can get out of tuning. But when that comes with high expense of power and temperatures i'm out.
Just few weeks ago i tweaked the shit out of my 5600X and my B-dies , just to realise i don't need it "yet". So i run 5600X at stock + auto oc from asus , works pretty well , at least i can run 2000 FCLK without WHEA ( btw. it seems WHEA errors are casued by PBO boost algoritms when high FCLK is involed - above 1800).
I don't care about stock, never did
My 5900x is far from stock, and drawing about 320w full load
I'm between , im all in for extra free performance that i can get out of tuning. But when that comes with high expense of power and temperatures i'm out.
Just few weeks ago i tweaked the shit out of my 5600X and my B-dies , just to realise i don't need it "yet". So i run 5600X at stock + auto oc from asus , works pretty well , at least i can run 2000 FCLK without WHEA ( btw. it seems WHEA errors are casued by PBO boost algoritms when high FCLK is involed - above 1800).
Trihy
Senior Member
Posts: 158
Joined: 2016-08-07
Senior Member
Posts: 158
Joined: 2016-08-07
#5899723 Posted on: 03/26/2021 08:36 PM
What it is?
It clearly says gracemont cores. So if you expect anything better, good luck.
https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/microarchitectures/gracemont
Gracemont is the successor of tremont, another atom cpu.
You clearly don't understand the architecture Intel is working on. It isn't just atom cores.
What it is?
It clearly says gracemont cores. So if you expect anything better, good luck.
https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/microarchitectures/gracemont
Gracemont is the successor of tremont, another atom cpu.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: 2005-06-29
A 10900k at 5.1 only scores slightly higher, so Rocket Lake is pretty good considering its only 8 core, 16 thread.