Kioxia Unveils 162-layer BiCS 6 NAND Memory and a Prototype PCIe 5.0 Solid State Drive up-to 30TB
Kioxia has revealed a prototype PCIe 5.0 SSD on WeChat in China. It's twice as fast, with sequential read and write rates of up to 14 GB/s and 7 GB/s, respectively. It also has Kioxia's new 162-layer bics 6 memory.
This is a 103 percent and 67% performance increase over existing PCIe 4.0 solutions. The prototype was a server SSD named CD7. In terms of capacity, it will range from 1.6 TB to 30 TB, with one to three drive writes each day. Unlike the CD5 and C6, the CD7 has an eight-channel memory controller.
The FL6 is the next-generation model of the CM6. Because of its high endurance (60 drive writes per day) and large storage capacity (ranging from 800GB to 3.2TB), this PCIe 4.0 SSD is primarily suitable for processing demanding read and write workloads. If you compare it to its predecessor, it is 7 percent and 135 percent faster in both random reading and writing than the previous version. "Xpoint," as Kioxia refers to its FL6 SSD, is a reference to the 3D XPoint products from Intel and Micron, respectively. These solid-state drives (SSDs) are marketed by Intel under the Optane brand name and are intended to serve as a transitional step between DRAM and NAND memory.
Bics 6 memory is an excellent beginning. It has a total of 162 layers. It becomes more difficult to scale when there are a large number of layers, however Kioxia claims that this has been handled by making each layer itself smaller. As a result, the amount of data has increased in density. For this iteration, the power circuit is also moved under the chip rather than next to it, which improves efficiency. A bics 6 chip would be 40% lower in size when compared to a bics 5 chip.
Senior Member
Posts: 3766
Joined: 2013-02-05
Maybe when MS finishes screwing around with the UI, icons, round corners and transparencies, they can get on the job of finishing Direct Storage.
To consider that SSDs have become mainstream, since the later years of Windows XP. And nvme drives are mainstream for half a decade.
But Windows still uses the same system as in the age of HDDs.
Senior Member
Posts: 1211
Joined: 2010-05-12
Well a new file system for windows wouldn't be bad tbh.
If we could have maybe a fast FS with no permissions, no attributes, just give me performances for loading applications. Put the important stuff somewhere else.
Senior Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 2016-10-04
Maybe when MS finishes screwing around with the UI, icons, round corners and transparencies, they can get on the job of finishing Direct Storage.
To consider that SSDs have become mainstream, since the later years of Windows XP. And nvme drives are mainstream for half a decade.
But Windows still uses the same system as in the age of HDDs.
Don't start with SSDs because btrfs is specifically designed for NVME/SSD and if it wasn't the lack of performance due to the multiple checks it would have been the go to FS for Linux.
And perf is affected for the things that make it amazing improving the lifespan and storage of the NVME/SSDs.
Senior Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 2016-10-04
Well a new file system for windows wouldn't be bad tbh.
If we could have maybe a fast FS with no permissions, no attributes, just give me performances for loading applications. Put the important stuff somewhere else.
There are faster FS than the one used on Windows having all those things too.
And if you want to improve the Windows performance turn off indexing completely if you do not search for files all the time across the drive
Senior Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 2016-10-04
These speeds don't matter much as long we are bottlenecked by the CPU and file system on Windows.
We really need Direct Storage to take advantage of these speeds.
Until then, this is only useful in a handful of situations.
Amen
We need XFS on Windows