Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
FSP Hydro G Pro 1000W (ATX 3.0, 1000W PSU) review
Intel's all 5 GHz cores Core i9 9900KS Processor has 127W TDP (Updated)
Intel today held a conference call related to IFA in Berlin, and unexpectedly they actually talked about the 9900KS, and mention that the all-core 5 GHz processor is due for a release next month.
The Core i9 9900KS processor will have 5 GHz boost activated on all eight cores. So in threaded workloads where one or all threads are utilized, the processor will jump to 5 GHz in all threads/cores. The existing Core i9 9900K, which has one core active up to 5 GHz, and all core stress translates towards a maximum of 4.7 GHz on all cores is the same product, this, however, is a heavily binned version of that SKU. Intel did not share any details on what the TDP is going to be for this SKU, as certainly it'll be higher than 100 Watts. Intel has not disclosed a price either.
In a presentation, they also showed some slides mentioning the slightly confusing situation on Turbo bins with AMD's Ryzen 3000, claiming for Intel 5 GHz simply is 5 GHz. The slide-show also held an interesting screengrab. Have a peek.
Update September 19th, 2019
New information reached us, the Core i9 9900KS will get a 127 Watt TDP as ASUS has released a BIOS update for its upcoming motherboards listing precisely this TDP, that's an increase if 34 percent. Not bad really, so we are really wondering how long the 5 GHz on all cores that's in place. 20~30 Seconds and then back to the base-clock at 4000 GHz as with this TDP you cannot continuously run 5 GHz at that wattage in our belief.
Also, mind you that TDP for Intel is not a maximum power used, that number likely is far higher in the 5 GHz all-core boost. So the question remains, the Intel all-core 5 GHz Boost .. is for how many seconds? The Core i9-9900KS has 16 MB of L3 cache, built-in UHD 630 GT2 graphics chip, supports DDR4-2666 memory, and the processor will continue to use IHS soldering to improve the heat and unpacking of the chip. The chip is due for release next month.
Intel's discrete graphics cards will not start at $200 - 08/05/2019 09:04 AM
Last week it was rumored that Intel's upcoming dedicated graphics cards, codenamed Arctic Sound, could become real price-goers, at least according to recent statements by chief architect and former A...
Single-core performance of Intel's Sunny Cove chips Surface - Shows Big IPC Increase - 06/17/2019 09:04 AM
Funny how these slides always seem to leak right after a competitor announcement ;) Anyhow, we're talking about Intel's new Sunny Cove architecture, which is still out for quite a while. Mind you t...
Intel's 'Auction-only' 14 Core Core i9-9990XE Gets Listed at Retailer website for 2999 EUR - 04/12/2019 08:25 AM
You guys remember the Core i9-9990XE we've talked about a couple of times right? Basically, Intel launched the product, then it was discovered this processor has only 14 cores and thus 28 threads o...
Eurocom Armadillo multi-touch 14" ultrabook with Intel's Core i7-4500U - 01/17/2014 08:33 AM
Eurocom releases Armadillo a multi-touch 14" ultrabook with Intel's Core i7-4500U. Eurocom is launching the thin, light and multi-touch enabled 14” Armadillo Ultrabook notebook. The b...
Intel's answer to ARM: Customisable x86 chips with HIDDEN POWERS - 05/21/2013 08:39 AM
Intel is dabbling in the customization of its x86 processors for specific large-scale customers in the server market. The effort is a strategy to expand its dominance and increase competition vs ARM. ...
BReal85
Senior Member
Posts: 487
Joined: 2016-10-25
Senior Member
Posts: 487
Joined: 2016-10-25
#5707945 Posted on: 09/04/2019 07:50 PM
Its a binned 9900k. Just like the 8086k was a binned 8700k.
Lots of normal 9900k's can reach all core 5Ghz, but I guess if you want to pay for the guarantee.... My 9900k does 5.1ghz all core @ 1.3v.
But yeah, at least the Intel CPUs can actually reach their advertised clock speeds.
Yeah and pay for that extra price. You don't even notice a performance difference at the Zen 2 CPUs that can't hit the max boost clock as the 200 Hz boost clock difference between the 3600 and 3600X results in nearly 0 performance difference. Hope you cried so much about the GTX 970's 3,5 GB issue. 80% of the PC builders realized Ryzens have much better value than Intel (Mindfactory, Japanese sales). You are in the milked 20%. GLHF blue boy.
Its a binned 9900k. Just like the 8086k was a binned 8700k.
Lots of normal 9900k's can reach all core 5Ghz, but I guess if you want to pay for the guarantee.... My 9900k does 5.1ghz all core @ 1.3v.
But yeah, at least the Intel CPUs can actually reach their advertised clock speeds.
Yeah and pay for that extra price. You don't even notice a performance difference at the Zen 2 CPUs that can't hit the max boost clock as the 200 Hz boost clock difference between the 3600 and 3600X results in nearly 0 performance difference. Hope you cried so much about the GTX 970's 3,5 GB issue. 80% of the PC builders realized Ryzens have much better value than Intel (Mindfactory, Japanese sales). You are in the milked 20%. GLHF blue boy.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 14039
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 14039
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5707951 Posted on: 09/04/2019 07:56 PM
Yeah and pay for that extra price. You don't even notice a performance difference at the Zen 2 CPUs that can't hit the max boost clock as the 200 Hz boost clock difference between the 3600 and 3600X results in nearly 0 performance difference. Intel fanboy alert.
https://www.techspot.com/article/1880-ryzen-3600x-vs-3600/
~4% performance increase for a ~4% clockspeed increase - "nearly 0 performance"
You should keep writing the same thing in every thread though I think after 8 times you'll finally be right.
Yeah and pay for that extra price. You don't even notice a performance difference at the Zen 2 CPUs that can't hit the max boost clock as the 200 Hz boost clock difference between the 3600 and 3600X results in nearly 0 performance difference. Intel fanboy alert.
https://www.techspot.com/article/1880-ryzen-3600x-vs-3600/
~4% performance increase for a ~4% clockspeed increase - "nearly 0 performance"
You should keep writing the same thing in every thread though I think after 8 times you'll finally be right.
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 3601
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 3601
Joined: 2007-05-31
#5707957 Posted on: 09/04/2019 08:09 PM
But yeah, at least the Intel CPUs can actually reach their advertised clock speeds.
Yeah and pay for that extra price. You don't even notice a performance difference at the Zen 2 CPUs that can't hit the max boost clock as the 200 Hz boost clock difference between the 3600 and 3600X results in nearly 0 performance difference. Hope you cried so much about the GTX 970's 3,5 GB issue. 80% of the PC builders realized Ryzens have much better value than Intel (Mindfactory, Japanese sales). You are in the milked 20%. GLHF blue boy.
On intel it's the same, between 4.8 and 5.0 there is almost no perf increase... (exept some that consider 2FPS as a huge gain lol)
Also on price argument it depend a lot on where you are.
In here:
- Intel I9 9900KS: 579,95 Euro
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X : 639,94 Euro
Both aviable soon
milk argument is invalid as motherboard also are at the same price since few years
Anyway i have both side dual Xeon + Quadro to work and Athlon GE (Ryzen) for anything under TV set.
AMD or Intel? up to the user taste because at the end it's the same
But yeah, at least the Intel CPUs can actually reach their advertised clock speeds.
Yeah and pay for that extra price. You don't even notice a performance difference at the Zen 2 CPUs that can't hit the max boost clock as the 200 Hz boost clock difference between the 3600 and 3600X results in nearly 0 performance difference. Hope you cried so much about the GTX 970's 3,5 GB issue. 80% of the PC builders realized Ryzens have much better value than Intel (Mindfactory, Japanese sales). You are in the milked 20%. GLHF blue boy.
On intel it's the same, between 4.8 and 5.0 there is almost no perf increase... (exept some that consider 2FPS as a huge gain lol)
Also on price argument it depend a lot on where you are.
In here:
- Intel I9 9900KS: 579,95 Euro
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X : 639,94 Euro
Both aviable soon
milk argument is invalid as motherboard also are at the same price since few years
Anyway i have both side dual Xeon + Quadro to work and Athlon GE (Ryzen) for anything under TV set.
AMD or Intel? up to the user taste because at the end it's the same
anticupidon
Senior Member
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2008-03-06
Senior Member
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2008-03-06
#5707958 Posted on: 09/04/2019 08:11 PM
Big yawn.
Anyone wanna chat about weather?
Because about CPUs is too much hassle.
Big yawn.
Anyone wanna chat about weather?
Because about CPUs is too much hassle.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 725
Joined: 2011-03-28
Its a binned 9900k. Just like the 8086k was a binned 8700k.
Lots of normal 9900k's can reach all core 5Ghz, but I guess if you want to pay for the guarantee.... My 9900k does 5.1ghz all core @ 1.3v.
But yeah, at least the Intel CPUs can actually reach their advertised clock speeds.