G.Skill KM360 Keyboard Review
Alphacool EISBAER Ex BLACK LCS review
Netgear Nighthawk AX12 Wi-Fi 6 router review
Corsair HS60 PRO Surround Headset Review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X review
Team Group Cardea II NVMe 1 TB SSD Review
ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming ITX/TB3 review
Promo: URCDKey Autumn Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Patriot P200 1TB SATA3 SSD Review
ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT Taichi OC+ review
Intel Xeon W-3275 with 28 cores spotted in Geekbench
Intel unveiled the 28-core Xeon W-3175 (a consumer processor) a few month ago, however a new CPU has turned up at Geekbench listed as Xeon W3275, and that sounds like a successor.
This CPU probably uses the same fabrication node as the ninth generation Core CPUs , it has 28 cores and 56 threads. The new variant scored 5,211 points in the single-core benchmarks, placing it between the Core i9 7940X (39,298) and the i9 9940X (40,928 points). The multi-core score is more interesting: the chip set a score of 39,869 points there, making it one of the best chips. For comparison: the Threadripper 2990WX scores about 34692 points in the multi-core test by Geekbench.
Very intersting is the low base clock, which has gone from 3.1 GHz with the Xeon W-3175 to 2.49 GHz. The single-core boost is somewhat higher; that is at 4.58 GHz. With the 3175 this was 4.3 GHz. It is not yet known exactly when this successor should appear in workstations, and not for what price. We also see an enormous amount of L3 cache: 38.5 MB. The L2 is also short on 28 MB. It is striking that the socket used would be lga 1151.
In any case, the 3175 should now be available for a suggested retail price of 3,000 USD. For the time being, you will only be able to get this chip by purchasing a workstation from an OEM , so it is not yet available as a separate SKU. It is to be expected that this will also be the case with the W-3275.
Intel Rendering Framework and Intel Xe architecture poised to advance studio workflows - 05/01/2019 10:00 AM
Xe architecture roadmap for data center optimized rendering includes ray tracing hardware acceleration support for the Intel Rendering Framework family of API’s and libraries....
Intel Xeon Processor Supporting Up to 56 Cores & 12 Channels Memory - 04/03/2019 09:12 AM
In an aim to fight with AMD in the datacenter Intel announced Cascade Lake-AP processors, which have up-to 56 cores and it is the successor "Skylake-SP" and "Xeon scalable processo...
VS will receive exascale supercomputer with Intel Xe GPUs in 2021 - 03/20/2019 09:14 AM
Intel and Cray are teaming up to create an exascale super compute(r) cluster for the US Department of Energy, which should be ready by 2021. The supercomputer has Intel written all over it, fitted wit...
Intel Xeon W-3175X 28-core Processor Released at $2,999 - 01/30/2019 07:23 PM
Starting today Intel offers their Xeon W-3175X processor, an unlocked 28-core workstation built for select, highly-threaded and computing-intensive applications such as architectural and industrial de...
Noctua introduces quiet CPU coolers for LGA3647 Intel Xeon platforms - 06/19/2018 11:43 AM
Noctua today introduced three quiet CPU coolers for the LGA3647 socket of Intel’s Xeon Scalable (Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze) and Xeon-Phi processors. ...
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11756
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 11756
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5666916 Posted on: 05/08/2019 02:33 PM
Not too impressed... here's mine
https://i.imgur.com/C7j5EtZ.jpg
You have 72threads(wow) so no wonder. Still, single thread performance on your chip is lower.
Not too impressed... here's mine
https://i.imgur.com/C7j5EtZ.jpg
You have 72threads(wow) so no wonder. Still, single thread performance on your chip is lower.
Netspark
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2006-01-17
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2006-01-17
#5666921 Posted on: 05/08/2019 03:02 PM
Okay, who can spot the discrepancy in this screenshot? If it is a Xeon processor, how comes the socet type iss an 1151 LGA? Even Supermicro says it's a 3647 LGA socket and not 1151 LGA...
maybe this screenshot is not genuine...
Okay, who can spot the discrepancy in this screenshot? If it is a Xeon processor, how comes the socet type iss an 1151 LGA? Even Supermicro says it's a 3647 LGA socket and not 1151 LGA...
maybe this screenshot is not genuine...
er557
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2002-07-24
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2002-07-24
#5666922 Posted on: 05/08/2019 03:09 PM
could be a simple detection issue in geekbench, due to a new platform.
mind you my platform is from circa 2015, but has 90mb L3 cache, and also my procs are turbo hacked(3.5ghz all 72 threads)
could be a simple detection issue in geekbench, due to a new platform.
You have 72threads(wow) so no wonder. Still, single thread performance on your chip is lower.
mind you my platform is from circa 2015, but has 90mb L3 cache, and also my procs are turbo hacked(3.5ghz all 72 threads)
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4424
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4424
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5666931 Posted on: 05/08/2019 03:30 PM
$3000? That's actually not too shabby . I still wouldn't buy it.
$3000? That's actually not too shabby . I still wouldn't buy it.
er557
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2002-07-24
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2002-07-24
#5666939 Posted on: 05/08/2019 03:46 PM
each of my procs which beat this behemoth, actually have cost 500$ used on ebay
each of my procs which beat this behemoth, actually have cost 500$ used on ebay
TLD LARS
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Joined: 2017-03-01
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Joined: 2017-03-01
#5666973 Posted on: 05/08/2019 04:55 PM
This looks like overclocked results, because the Intel base is 500MHz lower then the 32 core Threadripper that has 4 more cores.
This looks like overclocked results, because the Intel base is 500MHz lower then the 32 core Threadripper that has 4 more cores.
er557
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2002-07-24
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2002-07-24
#5666977 Posted on: 05/08/2019 05:02 PM
threadripper per core performance is lower, also less efficient interconnect
threadripper per core performance is lower, also less efficient interconnect
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: 2014-07-22
#5667006 Posted on: 05/08/2019 06:37 PM
$3k cpus are not "consumer" cpus, imo...
It's a Xeon, after all. Yields must be horrifically bad, if the info is even legit. Threadripper is certainly "consumer", however.
$3k cpus are not "consumer" cpus, imo...
It's a Xeon, after all. Yields must be horrifically bad, if the info is even legit. Threadripper is certainly "consumer", however.
ladcrooks
Senior Member
Posts: 303
Joined: 2016-12-29
Senior Member
Posts: 303
Joined: 2016-12-29
#5667230 Posted on: 05/09/2019 11:13 AM
Well Mr Bond, '' That was a fine remark there! Consumer cpu. '
Well Mr Bond, '' That was a fine remark there! Consumer cpu. '
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 2128
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 2128
Joined: 2007-05-31
#5667672 Posted on: 05/10/2019 10:32 AM
Okay, who can spot the discrepancy in this screenshot? If it is a Xeon processor, how comes the socet type iss an 1151 LGA? Even Supermicro says it's a 3647 LGA socket and not 1151 LGA...
maybe this screenshot is not genuine...
when my motherboard was out it was showing 1156 socket, (it is a twin 2011 V3), just a socket detection fail (can be show that it will be on a new socket too).
$3k cpus are not "consumer" cpus, imo... It's a Xeon, after all. Yields must be horrifically bad, if the info is even legit. Threadripper is certainly "consumer", however.
Well as you said it is not so bad for a pro CPU, mine were 5000 each in their time... (but it wasn't me who paid them
i bough them back at 255 each at the end of "usage time")
And yes TR is normal consumer and Epyc is pro consumer (and really more expensive than TR)
a kind like the intel X and Xeon, one is "entusiast with money" and other is "earn money with it".
Okay, who can spot the discrepancy in this screenshot? If it is a Xeon processor, how comes the socet type iss an 1151 LGA? Even Supermicro says it's a 3647 LGA socket and not 1151 LGA...
maybe this screenshot is not genuine...
when my motherboard was out it was showing 1156 socket, (it is a twin 2011 V3), just a socket detection fail (can be show that it will be on a new socket too).
$3k cpus are not "consumer" cpus, imo...
It's a Xeon, after all. Yields must be horrifically bad, if the info is even legit. Threadripper is certainly "consumer", however.Well as you said it is not so bad for a pro CPU, mine were 5000 each in their time... (but it wasn't me who paid them
i bough them back at 255 each at the end of "usage time")And yes TR is normal consumer and Epyc is pro consumer (and really more expensive than TR)
a kind like the intel X and Xeon, one is "entusiast with money" and other is "earn money with it".
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2002-07-24
Not too impressed... here's mine
https://i.imgur.com/C7j5EtZ.jpg