Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review
MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT GAMING X TRIO review
Guru3D Q1 Winter 20/21 PC Buyer Guide
AOC CU34G2X monitor review

New Downloads
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5640 beta
CrystalDiskInfo 8.11.2 Download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.3 driver download
GPU-Z Download v2.37.0
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH27.20.100.9313
HWiNFO Download v6.43 - 4380 Beta
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.2 driver download
3DMark Download v2.17.7137 + Time Spy
PCMark 10 Download v.2.1.2508


New Forum Topics
Asus laptop G733QS ryzen 5900HX rtx 3080 benchmarks GeForce 461.72 WHQL drivers: download & discussion AMD to announce Radeon RX 6700 Series upcoming March 3rd Microsoft To Share More Details on Microsoft DirectStorage for PC in April AMD is investigating USB problems with 500 series chipsets The AMD Ryzen All In One Tread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2 Review: MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO NASA Perseverance rover 200 MHZ CPU costs $200K Can't install RTX 2080 driver on Windows 8.1 Wheres this months driver?




Guru3D.com » News » Intel Xeon W-3275 with 28 cores spotted in Geekbench

Intel Xeon W-3275 with 28 cores spotted in Geekbench

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 05/08/2019 07:50 AM | source: Hardware Info | 11 comment(s)
Intel Xeon W-3275 with 28 cores spotted in Geekbench

Intel unveiled the 28-core Xeon W-3175 (a consumer processor) a few month ago, however a new CPU has turned up at Geekbench listed as  Xeon W3275, and that sounds like a successor.

This CPU probably uses the same fabrication node as the ninth generation Core CPUs , it has 28 cores and 56 threads. The new variant scored 5,211 points in the single-core benchmarks, placing it between the Core i9 7940X (39,298) and the i9 9940X (40,928 points). The multi-core score is more interesting: the chip set a score of 39,869 points there, making it one of the best chips. For comparison: the Threadripper 2990WX scores about 34692 points in the multi-core test by Geekbench.

Very intersting is the low base clock, which has gone from 3.1 GHz with the Xeon W-3175 to 2.49 GHz. The single-core boost is somewhat higher; that is at 4.58 GHz. With the 3175 this was 4.3 GHz. It is not yet known exactly when this successor should appear in workstations, and not for what price. We also see an enormous amount of L3 cache: 38.5 MB. The L2 is also short on 28 MB. It is striking that the socket used would be lga 1151.

In any case, the 3175 should now be available for a suggested retail price of 3,000 USD. For the time being, you will only be able to get this chip by purchasing a workstation from an OEM , so it is not yet available as a separate SKU. It is to be expected that this will also be the case with the W-3275.



Intel Xeon W-3275 with 28 cores spotted in Geekbench




« PNY releases XLR8 CS3030 NVME SSD with proper TBW values and perf · Intel Xeon W-3275 with 28 cores spotted in Geekbench · Samsung Introduces Exynos i T100 »

Related Stories

Intel Rendering Framework and Intel Xe architecture poised to advance studio workflows - 05/01/2019 09:00 AM
Xe architecture roadmap for data center optimized rendering includes ray tracing hardware acceleration support for the Intel Rendering Framework family of API’s and libraries....

Intel Xeon Processor Supporting Up to 56 Cores & 12 Channels Memory - 04/03/2019 08:12 AM
In an aim to fight with AMD in the datacenter Intel announced Cascade Lake-AP processors, which have up-to 56 cores and it is the successor "Skylake-SP" and "Xeon scalable processo...

VS will receive exascale supercomputer with Intel Xe GPUs in 2021 - 03/20/2019 08:14 AM
Intel and Cray are teaming up to create an exascale super compute(r) cluster for the US Department of Energy, which should be ready by 2021. The supercomputer has Intel written all over it, fitted wit...

Intel Xeon W-3175X 28-core Processor Released at $2,999 - 01/30/2019 06:23 PM
Starting today Intel offers their Xeon W-3175X processor, an unlocked 28-core workstation built for select, highly-threaded and computing-intensive applications such as architectural and industrial de...

Noctua introduces quiet CPU coolers for LGA3647 Intel Xeon platforms - 06/19/2018 10:43 AM
Noctua today introduced three quiet CPU coolers for the LGA3647 socket of Intel’s Xeon Scalable (Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze) and Xeon-Phi processors. ...


3 pages 1 2 3


er557
Senior Member



Posts: 433
Joined: 2002-07-24

#5666904 Posted on: 05/08/2019 12:47 PM
Not too impressed... here's mine

https://i.imgur.com/C7j5EtZ.jpg

Undying
Senior Member



Posts: 14840
Joined: 2008-08-28

#5666916 Posted on: 05/08/2019 01:33 PM
Not too impressed... here's mine

https://i.imgur.com/C7j5EtZ.jpg

You have 72threads(wow) so no wonder. Still, single thread performance on your chip is lower.

Netspark
Junior Member



Posts: 2
Joined: 2006-01-17

#5666921 Posted on: 05/08/2019 02:02 PM
Okay, who can spot the discrepancy in this screenshot? If it is a Xeon processor, how comes the socet type iss an 1151 LGA? Even Supermicro says it's a 3647 LGA socket and not 1151 LGA...

maybe this screenshot is not genuine...

er557
Senior Member



Posts: 433
Joined: 2002-07-24

#5666922 Posted on: 05/08/2019 02:09 PM
could be a simple detection issue in geekbench, due to a new platform.



You have 72threads(wow) so no wonder. Still, single thread performance on your chip is lower.

mind you my platform is from circa 2015, but has 90mb L3 cache, and also my procs are turbo hacked(3.5ghz all 72 threads)

schmidtbag
Senior Member



Posts: 5631
Joined: 2012-11-10

#5666931 Posted on: 05/08/2019 02:30 PM
$3000? That's actually not too shabby . I still wouldn't buy it.

3 pages 1 2 3


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021