Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review

New Downloads
GeForce 461.81 hotfix driver download
ClockTuner for Ryzen (CTR) v2.0 RC4 Download
SiSoft Sandra 20/21 download v31.12
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9316
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5644 beta
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download


New Forum Topics
AMD announces Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB at 479 USD, launches on March 18th 11700K Retail Review ClockTuner 2.0 for Ryzen (CTR) Guide and download GeForce Hotfix Driver Version 461.81 Windows 10 20H2 (Build 19042.508) Solution for stuck VRAM mem at max clocks on AMD Navi10 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti to get limited for Cryptocurrency Mining Performance Also system handles interrupts only on core0 Samsung 980 SSD Spotted at retailers, has a DRAMless design ClockTuner v2.0 RC4 for Ryzen (CTR) info and download




Guru3D.com » News » Intel Will no Longer Disclose Multi-Core Turbo Boost Frequencies

Intel Will no Longer Disclose Multi-Core Turbo Boost Frequencies

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 10/10/2017 08:09 AM | source: | 70 comment(s)
Intel Will no Longer Disclose Multi-Core Turbo Boost Frequencies

In yet another unexpected move Intel has made is clear that it will not be sharing any details anymore on the multi-core Turbo clock frequencies of their processors.

You might already have noticed it, Intel is only listing the highest Boost frequency, and not the rest. Here’s the thing, the recent generation processors basically have three main frequencies.

  1. Base Baseclock
  2. Binned multi all-core clock turbo
  3. Single thread turbo

Intel from now on will only list the base and (1) and Single thread (3) turbo. As to why this is, remains uncertain, however many scenarios pop into mind. It might be a legal reason as they cannot guarantee the all core turbo on all processors.However, the longer I think about this, then an old routine kicks in .. what would be the most probable? Might it be that Intel likes that highest Turbo listed on their packaging a bit better for marketing  and thus sales? I mean, it’s not unthinkable right? The guys from eteknix have a quote from Intel on this:

“[W]e’re no longer disclosing this level of detail as its proprietary to Intel. Intel only specifies processor frequencies for base and single-core Turbo in our processor marketing and technical collateral, such as ARK, and not the multi-core Turbo frequencies. We’re aligning communications to be consistent. All Turbo frequencies are opportunistic given their dependency on system configuration and workloads.”

So a Core i7 8700 is now being listed as a 4.7 GHz processor (click the link and look at the ARK info). But considering that is just one thread, it really runs 4.3 GHz on all six cores. Weird move huh?

 

ProcessorCores / ThreadsBase ClockTurbo 2.0 (6c)Turbo 3.0 (1c)L3TDPPrice
Core i7 8700K 6/12 3.7 GHz 4.3 GHz 4.7 GHz 12 MB 95 W $359 / €389
Core i7 8700 6/12 3.2 GHz 4.3 GHz 4.6 GHz 12 MB 65 W $303 / €327
Core i5 8600K 6/6 3.6 GHz 4.1 GHz 4.3 GHz 9 MB 95 W $257 / €273
Core i5 8400 6/6 2.8 GHz 3.8 GHz 4.0 GHz 9 MB 65 W $182 / €192
Core i3 8350K 4/4 4.0 GHz NA NA 8 MB 91 W $169 / €189
Core i3 8300 4/4 4.0 GHz NA NA 8 MB 65 W -
Core i3 8100 4/4 3.6 GHz NA NA 6 MB 65 W $117 / €123


If you look at the above table, pretty much the greyed out Turbo 2.0 info is no longer disclosed by Intel. 







« Microsoft halts development of Windows 10 Mobile · Intel Will no Longer Disclose Multi-Core Turbo Boost Frequencies · Review: Cooler Master MasterCase H500P PC case »

Related Stories

Intel Z370 Chipset Could Support Kaby Lake - But Intel Will Not Allow It - 09/22/2017 08:15 PM
Much has been said and spoken about Intel upcoming 6-core Coffee Lake processors. It will launch based on a LGA 1151 Socket. We’ve been able to conform that Z370 will only support Coffee La...

Intel Will Add Wi-Fi and USB 3.1 support into next-gen chipsets - 11/10/2016 06:34 PM
Intel reportedly is planning to add USB 3.1 and Wi-Fi functionality housed directly inside their motherboard chipsets, likely starting at 300-series scheduledwhich would be released at the end of 2017...

Intel Will Launch Two LGA1150 Broadwell CPUs with 65W TDP - 03/24/2015 11:52 AM
In the second half of 2015, Intel is to launch two LGA1150 Broadwell CPUs (Intel Core I7-5775C & Core I5-5675C) based on socket 1150, both have a 65W TDP. In tital 5 models will be launched but th...

2014 was a good year for Intel with 56 Billion USD Revenue - 01/16/2015 08:09 AM
Intel issued a document sharing its fourth-quarter financial results, they had a record year. Full year revenue increased 6 percent to $55.9 billion and net profit came in at $11.7 billion. Intel sa...

Intel will pay $1.5 billion in Nvidia settlement - 01/15/2014 09:33 AM
Intel and Nvidia are burying the hatchet and put away their differences and ongoing lawsuit and have settled for a $1.5 billion, six year cross-licensing agreement between the rival chipmakers. The...


14 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


user1
Senior Member



Posts: 1625
Joined: 2016-01-29

#5480124 Posted on: 10/10/2017 08:56 AM
wanky marketing as per usual, the sad part is that who ever thought to do this is probably getting a raise if it works.

also proprietary my ass.

fry178
Senior Member



Posts: 1661
Joined: 2012-04-30

#5480127 Posted on: 10/10/2017 09:02 AM
@krakenxt
being more expensive? check
being only up for one chipset cycle? check
running hotter? check

ryzen will offer more cores at lower price than the i5 is going for, and as long as ppl are not interested in MT perf, it can even be more cheap than intel..
besides the fact that those not upgrading every year will have a nice platform to upgrade the cpu in a few years without having to change the rest (at higher cost).

not sure what you mean by wrecked entire lineup...

fantaskarsef
Senior Member



Posts: 12061
Joined: 2014-07-21

#5480129 Posted on: 10/10/2017 09:15 AM
I guess it makes good reviews even more important then, and not buying before you have read them.

cryohellinc
Senior Member



Posts: 3351
Joined: 2014-10-20

#5480131 Posted on: 10/10/2017 09:19 AM
AMD circlejerk finally found an article they can release some steam after Coffeelake wrecked the entire Ryzen lineup.

"wrecked" in accordance to Whom? I hardly call your biased opinion a source of relevant information. Fanboy all you want, without AMD you would still sit on i7 8700k as quad core.

Don't forget a simple fact that Intel is exploiting this technology process for several years now, while Ryzen is not even a year old. What does this tell us? Unless Intel will devise a brand new architecture on a new process, we will see more of the same down the road. Ryzen on the other hand is just a first step.
Im looking forward to comparisons of Ryzen re-release this February and 8700k.

Personally I rather stick with solid platform for years to come, then jump a chipset every release with lame shady excuses as to why we can't keep previous "generation" chipset.

Vananovion
Senior Member



Posts: 137
Joined: 2017-08-31

#5480133 Posted on: 10/10/2017 09:19 AM
This looks like a clear case of misleading the consumer. If I want to buy a multicore CPU and see its boost frequency of 4.7Ghz, I expect all cores to be able to do that. I smell a court case in the EU for Intel in the near future.

14 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021