ASUS STRIX X570-E Gaming review
EK Classic RGB P240 review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
Synology DS620slim Gigabit NAS Review
Fractal Design Vector RS review
Corsair iCUE 465X review
be quiet! Pure Base 500 review
Borderlands 3: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Swiftech H240 X3 AIO review
Promo: URCDKey Autumn Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 with AX Wifi Has Launched
On January 28 the FCC published Intel's application for the M.2 version of their Wi-Fi 6 AX201 network adapter, with model name AX201NGW. Formerly known as Cyclone Peak the units are now available.
It is very similar to the previous Wireless-AC 9260 network card, but with 802.11ax support. Which will most likely mean peak connection rates of 574 Mb/s on 2,4 GHz and 2402 Mb/s on 5 GHz. In the process some specs got confirmed:
- 802.11ax support in both bands
- Uses M.2 2230 form factor
- 2 antenna's for 2x2 MIMO
- 5 GHz band supports 160 MHz
- Bluetooth 5 support
That means 802.11ax is here, we recently already tested a router with WIFI6 AX, but lacked a client-side unit to test it. Latency should get a bit lower with AX, as well as a bump in performance (albeit that remains relative). Intel will be selling these units at 10 to 17 bucks a pop for partners to add into motherboards, laptops, and small computers.
Intel Will launch a 28 core Desktop Processor at End Of Year - 06/05/2018 09:38 AM
Intel just announced a 28-core/56-thread high-end desktop processor, this will be called "Skylake XCC" with XCC for extreme core count. The processor has a 700 mm² die on a client-segmen...
Intel Will no Longer Disclose Multi-Core Turbo Boost Frequencies - 10/10/2017 09:09 AM
In yet another unexpected move Intel has made is clear that it will not be sharing any details anymore on the multi-core Turbo clock frequencies of their processors....
Intel Z370 Chipset Could Support Kaby Lake - But Intel Will Not Allow It - 09/22/2017 09:15 PM
Much has been said and spoken about Intel upcoming 6-core Coffee Lake processors. It will launch based on a LGA 1151 Socket. We’ve been able to conform that Z370 will only support Coffee La...
Intel Will Add Wi-Fi and USB 3.1 support into next-gen chipsets - 11/10/2016 07:34 PM
Intel reportedly is planning to add USB 3.1 and Wi-Fi functionality housed directly inside their motherboard chipsets, likely starting at 300-series scheduledwhich would be released at the end of 2017...
Intel Will Launch Two LGA1150 Broadwell CPUs with 65W TDP - 03/24/2015 12:52 PM
In the second half of 2015, Intel is to launch two LGA1150 Broadwell CPUs (Intel Core I7-5775C & Core I5-5675C) based on socket 1150, both have a 65W TDP. In tital 5 models will be launched but th...
FM57
Senior Member
Posts: 151
Joined: 2016-12-28
Senior Member
Posts: 151
Joined: 2016-12-28
#5656645 Posted on: 04/03/2019 02:39 PM
Not for gaming, but interesting for those (like me) with fiber connection (1gbs down - 600mbs up).
Wifi is still the bottle-neck for streaming / downloading.
Not for gaming, but interesting for those (like me) with fiber connection (1gbs down - 600mbs up).
Wifi is still the bottle-neck for streaming / downloading.
pato
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Joined: 2003-08-25
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Joined: 2003-08-25
#5656648 Posted on: 04/03/2019 02:49 PM
what is the latency of wifi these days? it's the one part i've been missing from motherboard reviews...and come to think of it i don't think it was mentioned in the XR500 router review (which i now own since good reviews and the modem/wifi combo from the isp was annoying me with modem crashes and it makes for a decent on the cheap media server when your to cheap to buy a NAS or something :p).
the throughput these days seems impressive but how much does modern wifi add to the ping compared to the 0-1ms of a cable.
i've been considering getting a higher end mobo with wifi built in so i could eventually get rid of the 20m of cable i've poorly hidden through the house but i do game a lot and wile cable is still ofc king but has wifi reached the "eh ping difference is so low it kinda doesn't matter if you do it right" point
With a low load, you're talking about 0-1 ms. This number can greatly increase, the more active clients you have.
Now with 802.11ax is a new standard added to the Wi-Fi standard (sadly only for 802.11ax APs and clients), named DL-OFDMA. This is BY FAR the most important addition of 802.11ax, as it allows real QoS (time reservation for important applications).
Read more here:
https://blog.aerohive.com/dl-ofdma/
http://divdyn.com/802-11axs-achilles-heel/
what is the latency of wifi these days? it's the one part i've been missing from motherboard reviews...and come to think of it i don't think it was mentioned in the XR500 router review (which i now own since good reviews and the modem/wifi combo from the isp was annoying me with modem crashes and it makes for a decent on the cheap media server when your to cheap to buy a NAS or something :p).
the throughput these days seems impressive but how much does modern wifi add to the ping compared to the 0-1ms of a cable.
i've been considering getting a higher end mobo with wifi built in so i could eventually get rid of the 20m of cable i've poorly hidden through the house but i do game a lot and wile cable is still ofc king but has wifi reached the "eh ping difference is so low it kinda doesn't matter if you do it right" point
With a low load, you're talking about 0-1 ms. This number can greatly increase, the more active clients you have.
Now with 802.11ax is a new standard added to the Wi-Fi standard (sadly only for 802.11ax APs and clients), named DL-OFDMA. This is BY FAR the most important addition of 802.11ax, as it allows real QoS (time reservation for important applications).
Read more here:
https://blog.aerohive.com/dl-ofdma/
http://divdyn.com/802-11axs-achilles-heel/
fry178
Senior Member
Posts: 1097
Joined: 2012-04-30
Senior Member
Posts: 1097
Joined: 2012-04-30
#5656653 Posted on: 04/03/2019 03:00 PM
@FM57
Lol for that comment.
My roommate is running wifi b/g single band router floor below and i have 10 to 12ms, most of the time around 11ms connected to the game server, when wired gives me 9ms as the lowest ive seen 8ms.
And by the time its a bottleneck for bandwidth, your not one of the +80% of the market anyway, and your most likely not using it for gaming alone.
Friends have 1Gbit speeds and wifi is maybe a few hundreds slower, while ONE router for 10 devices is in the basement with concrete walls.
I guarantee +90% will have added input lag around 20 to 30ms just because of the fact they are gaming on tv, and/or wrong settings for win/tcp etc.
@FM57
Lol for that comment.
My roommate is running wifi b/g single band router floor below and i have 10 to 12ms, most of the time around 11ms connected to the game server, when wired gives me 9ms as the lowest ive seen 8ms.
And by the time its a bottleneck for bandwidth, your not one of the +80% of the market anyway, and your most likely not using it for gaming alone.
Friends have 1Gbit speeds and wifi is maybe a few hundreds slower, while ONE router for 10 devices is in the basement with concrete walls.
I guarantee +90% will have added input lag around 20 to 30ms just because of the fact they are gaming on tv, and/or wrong settings for win/tcp etc.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4343
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4343
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5656674 Posted on: 04/03/2019 03:58 PM
I've considered building a server rack to cram all of my various PCs in while using my laptop and TV as thin clients, and use an ad-hoc wifi connection to stream the display and audio. That way I don't have to deal with the noise, exhaust heat, and cables of all those computers in my living space, and since the connection is ad-hoc over a different frequency range, there shouldn't be any issues with interference or bandwidth being choked. Each of the computers in the rack could be connected via Ethernet, so file transfers between them will be very fast, and again, without messing with the wifi bandwidth.
what is the latency of wifi these days? it's the one part i've been missing from motherboard reviews...and come to think of it i don't think it was mentioned in the XR500 router review (which i now own since good reviews and the modem/wifi combo from the isp was annoying me with modem crashes and it makes for a decent on the cheap media server when your to cheap to buy a NAS or something :p).
the throughput these days seems impressive but how much does modern wifi add to the ping compared to the 0-1ms of a cable.
i've been considering getting a higher end mobo with wifi built in so i could eventually get rid of the 20m of cable i've poorly hidden through the house but i do game a lot and wile cable is still ofc king but has wifi reached the "eh ping difference is so low it kinda doesn't matter if you do it right" point
As stated by pato, it's highly variable. The more clients and just general interference you have (whether that be EMI, other wifi networks, or walls/objects blocking your signal) the worse your ping and overall bandwidth is going to be. Seeing as you already have cables laid out, I'd recommend you stick with it if you can tolerate it.
I've considered building a server rack to cram all of my various PCs in while using my laptop and TV as thin clients, and use an ad-hoc wifi connection to stream the display and audio. That way I don't have to deal with the noise, exhaust heat, and cables of all those computers in my living space, and since the connection is ad-hoc over a different frequency range, there shouldn't be any issues with interference or bandwidth being choked. Each of the computers in the rack could be connected via Ethernet, so file transfers between them will be very fast, and again, without messing with the wifi bandwidth.
what is the latency of wifi these days? it's the one part i've been missing from motherboard reviews...and come to think of it i don't think it was mentioned in the XR500 router review (which i now own since good reviews and the modem/wifi combo from the isp was annoying me with modem crashes and it makes for a decent on the cheap media server when your to cheap to buy a NAS or something :p).
the throughput these days seems impressive but how much does modern wifi add to the ping compared to the 0-1ms of a cable.
i've been considering getting a higher end mobo with wifi built in so i could eventually get rid of the 20m of cable i've poorly hidden through the house but i do game a lot and wile cable is still ofc king but has wifi reached the "eh ping difference is so low it kinda doesn't matter if you do it right" point
As stated by pato, it's highly variable. The more clients and just general interference you have (whether that be EMI, other wifi networks, or walls/objects blocking your signal) the worse your ping and overall bandwidth is going to be. Seeing as you already have cables laid out, I'd recommend you stick with it if you can tolerate it.
Moofachuka
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 2016-02-02
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 2016-02-02
#5656702 Posted on: 04/03/2019 06:09 PM
I was playing some games through Wifi N and I don't really feel the lag though... of course, wired is the best option, but I don't feel there's a big difference between N, AC, and AX... maybe it's just me...
I was playing some games through Wifi N and I don't really feel the lag though... of course, wired is the best option, but I don't feel there's a big difference between N, AC, and AX... maybe it's just me...
pato
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Joined: 2003-08-25
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Joined: 2003-08-25
#5656704 Posted on: 04/03/2019 06:20 PM
Don't forget, the client also must support the 802.11XX standard. So if you have an 802.11ac Wave2 AP, then the clients also needs to support that, to profit of the new features. If you have an older client which is transmitting data, then the speed drops back to the lower standard for that duration.
Don't forget, the client also must support the 802.11XX standard. So if you have an 802.11ac Wave2 AP, then the clients also needs to support that, to profit of the new features. If you have an older client which is transmitting data, then the speed drops back to the lower standard for that duration.
Corrupt^
Senior Member
Posts: 6874
Joined: 2005-12-02
Senior Member
Posts: 6874
Joined: 2005-12-02
#5656711 Posted on: 04/03/2019 07:01 PM
The pure latency is fairly OK these days, but it's the spikes and inconsistencies that are the problem. Also depends on how many Wireless devices are being used at the same time. You could also give powerlines a go, but I'd go with decent brand such as Devolo.
i've been considering getting a higher end mobo with wifi built in so i could eventually get rid of the 20m of cable i've poorly hidden through the house but i do game a lot and wile cable is still ofc king but has wifi reached the "eh ping difference is so low it kinda doesn't matter if you do it right" point
The pure latency is fairly OK these days, but it's the spikes and inconsistencies that are the problem. Also depends on how many Wireless devices are being used at the same time. You could also give powerlines a go, but I'd go with decent brand such as Devolo.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: 2009-03-21
what is the latency of wifi these days? it's the one part i've been missing from motherboard reviews...and come to think of it i don't think it was mentioned in the XR500 router review (which i now own since good reviews and the modem/wifi combo from the isp was annoying me with modem crashes and it makes for a decent on the cheap media server when your to cheap to buy a NAS or something :p).
the throughput these days seems impressive but how much does modern wifi add to the ping compared to the 0-1ms of a cable.
i've been considering getting a higher end mobo with wifi built in so i could eventually get rid of the 20m of cable i've poorly hidden through the house but i do game a lot and wile cable is still ofc king but has wifi reached the "eh ping difference is so low it kinda doesn't matter if you do it right" point