Intel Skylake Launch Schedule Surfaces
Lots and lots of info on Skylake surfaces on the web lately. This round itsa roadmap that details the launch schedule of the 6th gen processors.
The roadmap is leaked by Benchlife, an Asian website. Next to the desktop range Intel is seriously updating its mobility lineup. The desktop side would be the Skylake-S series, the Skylake-Y series would power the Core M based processors for ultra low TDP devices, Skylake-U processors will be mainstream mobility devices and Skylake-H series are the high-end, performance focused mobility chips that will include both regular HQ variants along with Xeon processors for consumers demanding extra workstation capabilities on developer notebooks.
95W Skylake-S Processors (Core i7-6700K / Core i5-6600K)
The quad-core processor with HyperThreading enabled will get 8 logical CPUs. with a clock frequency of 4.00 GHz and a turbo towards 4.20 GHz Turbo Boost frequency. The CPU has 8 MB L3 cache, and an integrated memory controller that supports both DDR4 and DDR3 memory.
- Core i7 6700K
4 cores and Hyper-Threading, 4.0GHz frequency, 4.20GHz maximum Turbo Boost frequency, 8MB last-level cache, dual-channel DDR3/DDR4 memory controller with 1600MHz or 2133MHz support, 95W TDP, Intel HD Graphics 5000-series integrated graphics core, LGA1151 packaging
- Core i5 6600K
4 cores, 3.50GHz frequency, 3.90GHz maximum Turbo Boost frequency, 6MB last-level cache, dual-channel DDR3/DDR4 memory controller with 1600MHz or 2133MHz support, 95W TDP, Intel HD Graphics 5000-series integrated graphics core, LGA1151 packaging;
Intel 65W Mainstream Skylake-S Processors (Core i7 / Core i5)
WccfTech has got a nice skinny on these ones. Coming to the mainstream lineup, we are looking at 4 chips which include the Core i7-6700 that features same specifications as the Core i7-6700K but doesn’t come in an unlocked package. Similarly, the Core i5-6600 also has the same specifications as seen on the unlocked model but without the K-Series design that allows over-clocking support. Clocks for the Core i7-6700 are maintained at 3.4 GHz base and 4.0 GHz boost while the Core i5-6600 is clocked at 3.3 GHz base and 3.9 GHz boost. The Core i5-6500 is a quad core clocked at 3.2 GHz base and 3.6 GHz boost while the Core i5-6400 is a quad core clocked at 2.7 GHz base and 3.3 GHz boost. All of these chips feature a 65W TDP and the Core i5 models pack 6 MB of L3 cache while the Core i7 model gets 8 MB L3 cache.
Intel 35W Low TDP Skylake-S Processors (Core i7 / Core i5)
Over at the more power efficient side, Intel will launch 4 T-Series chips which stand for low-power. All chips feature just 35W TDP and include Core i7-6700T as a multi-threaded quad core with 2.8 GHz base and 3.6 GHz boost clock. It packs 8 MB of L3 cache. The Core i5 models range from the Core i5-6600T, Core i5-6500T and Core i5-6400T featuring 6 MB of L3 cache, quad core (non-multithreaded designs) and boost speeds ranging from 2.8 to 3.6 GHz.
Intel Skylake-S Desktop Processors Lineup | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Process | Cores | Core Clock | Boost Clock | Cache | Memory Support | TDP | Socket | Unlocked Design |
Core i7-6700K | 14nm | 4/8 | 4.0 GHz | 4.2 GHz | 8 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 95W | LGA 1151 | Yes |
Core i5-6600K | 14nm | 4/4 | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | 6 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 95W | LGA 1151 | Yes |
Core i7-6700 | 14nm | 4/8 | 3.4 GHz | 4.0 GHz | 8 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 65W | LGA 1151 | No |
Core i5-6600 | 14nm | 4/4 | 3.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz | 6 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 65W | LGA 1151 | No |
Core i5-6500 | 14nm | 4/4 | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 6 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 65W | LGA 1151 | No |
Core i5-6400 | 14nm | 4/4 | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz | 6 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 65W | LGA 1151 | No |
Core i7-6700T | 14nm | 4/8 | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 8 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 35W | LGA 1151 | No |
Core i5-6600T | 14nm | 4/4 | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz | 6 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 35W | LGA 1151 | No |
Core i5-6500T | 14nm | 4/4 | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz | 6 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 35W | LGA 1151 | No |
Core i5-6400T | 14nm | 4/4 | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | 6 MB | DDR4 2133 MHz | 35W | LGA 1151 | No |
Intel Skylake GT4e GPU 50 percent faster compared to Broadwell GT3e - 05/11/2015 11:06 AM
Intels embedded integrated graphics for upcoming Skylake processors will gain quite a bit in performance compared to Broadwell, this however is the top model GT4e we are talking about that should be ...
Intel Skylake Core i7-6700K Benchmarks - 04/29/2015 05:15 PM
A website called pcfrm shared Intel Skylake Core i7-6700K Benchmarks. The 6th generation core series processor will be the successor to Broadwell. The top-dog quad-core processor would be the Core ...
Specs on Intel Skylake IGP leak - 10/20/2014 09:42 AM
There has been talk and gossip about the upcoming Intel Skylake IGP. Chips based on the IGP are due for launch in 2015. CPU World got a hold of new details about the Skylake GT1, GT2, GT3e and GT4e ...
Intel Skylake-S Platform Specs Z170-100-Series Chipset by 2H 2015 - 07/14/2014 11:59 AM
Some new info on the pending Skylake-S chipset from Intel have surfaced on the web. The chipset will become available in 2H 2015 on many motherboards and will sport a series 100 Intel chipset chip. ...
Intel Skylake Processors available in 2H 2015 get DDR3 and DDR4 support - 06/05/2014 03:30 PM
A roadmap appeared on the web earlier yesterday showing some interesting information regarding Intel Skylake Processors. They are to be released in 2015 and Skylake processors would have both DDR3 an...
Member
Posts: 96
Joined: 2015-05-19
The thing about Zen it's that is x86 architecture, isn't it going to be a bit of a downside?
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
Do you want everyone to move from x86 to ARM or POWER? Your CPU is x86 as any other you likely had in desktop in your life.
Senior Member
Posts: 472
Joined: 2014-09-21
You clearly do not know that their bench has trouble reading clocks and mostly reports base clocks on windows.
Stock i5-4670k (3.4GHz) does around 10000-11000 based on memory speed.
You want to back absolutely ridiculous argument in which clock to clock intel has 2.8x higher performance.
Because your statement implies that 4.6GHz with 8 cores is equal to 3.3GHz with 4 cores:
4.6 * 8 = 3.3 * 4 * x
x = 4.6/3.3 * 8/4
x = 2.788
If that was true then half of i3 (1c/2t) would be around equal to 4 cored FX chip since HT does add around 1/3rd of performance in average.
And in your delusion regular i3 (2c/4t) would battle with FX-8350, because 2 full i3 cores would be equal to 5.6 AMD's and 2x HT cores would add around 2 AMD's ~= 7.6 AMD cores in mere i3.
Let it sink for a moment, then take a deep breath and laugh at yourself.
No one is laughing at me dude. You've deviated so far from the original point that we're not even talking about Skylake anymore. You still have no idea how skylake will perform, you have no idea how Zen will perform, you clearly have no understanding of DX12's purpose and you have a false sense of what IPC even means.
Think about it. We started this talking about Skylake's potential performance and you're adding nonspecific i3 cores together like CPU performance is a problem of basic addition.
I'm done.
Senior Member
Posts: 17490
Joined: 2012-05-18
Because x86 is universal PC thing
x86 means Intel 80x86 compatible. This used to include the 8086, a 16-bit only processor. Nowadays it roughly means any CPU with a 32-bit Intel compatible instruction set (usually anything from Pentium onwards). Never read x32 being used.
x64 means a CPU that is x86 compatible but has a 64-bit mode as well (most often the 64-bit instruction set as introduced by AMD is meant; Intel's idea of a 64-bit mode didn't work and its now using AMDs variant).
So most of the time you can simplify it this way: x86 is Intel compatible in 32-bit mode, x64 is Intel compatible in 64-bit mode.
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
Spare me.
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/455590
You clearly do not know that their bench has trouble reading clocks and mostly reports base clocks on windows.
Stock i5-4670k (3.4GHz) does around 10000-11000 based on memory speed.
You want to back absolutely ridiculous argument in which clock to clock intel has 2.8x higher performance.
Because your statement implies that 4.6GHz with 8 cores is equal to 3.3GHz with 4 cores:
4.6 * 8 = 3.3 * 4 * x
x = 4.6/3.3 * 8/4
x = 2.788
If that was true then half of i3 (1c/2t) would be around equal to 4 cored FX chip since HT does add around 1/3rd of performance in average.
And in your delusion regular i3 (2c/4t) would battle with FX-8350, because 2 full i3 cores would be equal to 5.6 AMD's and 2x HT cores would add around 2 AMD's ~= 7.6 AMD cores in mere i3.
Let it sink for a moment, then take a deep breath and laugh at yourself.