Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review

New Downloads
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.2 WHQL download
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4382
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.1 Download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v5.2
GeForce 535.98 WHQL driver download
CPU-Z download v2.06
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.1 WHQL download
GeForce 532.03 WHQL driver download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.05.16.529
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.4


New Forum Topics
Migrating OS NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix Driver 536.09 AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.5.2 - Driver Download and Discussion Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Discovery Remix 23.4.2 WHQL [Omega 23.5.1 WIP] Phison Introduces New E31T and E27T SSD Controllers with Impressive Speeds The AMD Ryzen All In One Thread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2 AMD Driver DLLs Repository and Performance Survey Review: Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe 2TB SSD going for 12GB/s Sporadic black screen after Windows boot. Review: Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon)




Guru3D.com » News » Intel Six Core Lineup exposed - Core i7-8700K and Core i5-8600K

Intel Six Core Lineup exposed - Core i7-8700K and Core i5-8600K

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/17/2017 05:34 PM | source: | 74 comment(s)
Intel Six Core Lineup exposed - Core i7-8700K and Core i5-8600K

We've been talking and debating intel Coffee Lake for some time now. new information surfaced on the web, including SKU names and base clock frequencies. The big daddy proc would be the Core i7 8700K with a 3.7 Ghz base-clock in a 6c/12t configuration.

Actually Intel would be planning to release four six-core models, two of them get hyper-threading, two will not (Core i5 versus i7). Coffee Lake processors will be fabbed at a 14nm node and would be available on LGA1151 within months. French magazine Canard PC is basing the new information up-on reports that the first samples have been supplied to customers. The top model Core i7-8700K would get a 3.7 base clock (turbo's are not yet known).  A non-K model would get a lower 3.2 GHz base clock.

Currently the release lineup looks like this:

Processor Cores / Threads Clock speed Turbo L3 TDP
Core i7-8700K 6/12 3,7GHz tba 12MB 95W
Core i7-8700 6/12 3.2GHz tba 12MB 95W
Core i5-8600K 6/6 3,6GHz tba 9MB 95W
Core i5-8400 6/6 2.8GHz tba 9MB 65W

The Core i5-8600K however would be getting a 3.6 GHz base clock and is an unlocked model. Intel supposedly also will release a Core i5 series with the Core i5-8400 would run at a base of 2.8 Ghz, and is locked. Coffee Lake should be released together with the Z370 / H370 chipsets and logic assumes a release later this year in the Q3 region. Intel 300 series desktop processor motherboard would be based on the current LGA 1151 socket, the SiSoft results already have shown Platform entries.



Intel Six Core Lineup exposed - Core i7-8700K and Core i5-8600K




« AMD Ryzen Threadripper might get AIO LCS Liquid cooling bundled · Intel Six Core Lineup exposed - Core i7-8700K and Core i5-8600K · Samsung Increases Production of 8Gb HBM2 Memory »

Related Stories

Intel Silently Launches Wireless-AC 9260 wifi 1733 Mb/s with 160 MHz channels & Bluetooth 5 - 05/02/2017 08:52 AM
Intel silently has introduced a new wifi0card. The specs are available for download on the Intel website. Typically not big news, but Intel certainly made a number of improvements as the AC 9260 will...

Intel Six-Core i7-970 CPU shipping - 07/16/2010 01:48 PM
This processor was in the pipeline for a while now, yet I am surprised to see it launched so soon. Intel is about to release this product, yet a UK etailer jumped the gun. The Core i7 970 will be cloc...

Intel six-core Core i9 photo's - 09/21/2009 11:37 AM
Thoughy incredibly dull to look at, as they all look the same, the first photo's of a six-core Core i9 processor surfaced over the weekend, this is the Gulftown SKU

Intel six-core Gulftown expected in Q2 2010 - 05/13/2009 09:47 AM
The chaps over at fudzilla reported today that Intel is planning to deliver its 32nm six-core Gulftown processor in the second quarter of 2010. The company has said to a special few that the new CPU ...


15 pages « 2 3 4 5 > »


Silva
Senior Member



Posts: 1992
Joined: 2013-06-04

#5453297 Posted on: 07/17/2017 07:14 PM
So where are all the fanboys saying 4 cores for gaming is enough?
An i5 with 6 cores? How intel has changed this year...
My 2500k is still running strong, haven't even pushed more than 4.0Ghz on it.
Wont upgrade for less than 6c/16t and everyone knows i7 are overpriced BS so I know where's my money going (for now).
Also, that 8400 at 2.8Ghz...unless it turbos to 4Ghz, it will be in trouble.

nevcairiel
Senior Member



Posts: 853
Joined: 2015-05-19

#5453300 Posted on: 07/17/2017 07:36 PM
So where are all the fanboys saying 4 cores for gaming is enough?


It really is, though. At least today. In the future? Who knows. My crystal ball is on strike.

But that doesn't mean we should not innovate. The world doesn't revolve around gaming.

Fox2232
Senior Member



Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20

#5453301 Posted on: 07/17/2017 07:36 PM
Year ago, I would buy that 6C/6T on the spot. Today I consider minimum 6C/12T.

And interesting thing will come now. Because there are 2 possibilities:
1) Intel drops prices of 4C/4T & 4C/8T considerably to make space (Considering their 4C/$C pricing on X299, I do not think it will happen.)
2) Intel drops prices of 4C/4T & 4C/8T tiny bit and adds expensive 6C/6T & 6C/12T as options for those willing to pay that extra.

Either way it is bad move. In 1st case it will alienate many people who recently bought those now cheaper chips. And rest will consider price difference as big milking.
In 2nd case, big price for those new chips will not make them as attractive as AMD's.

Especially those locked ones. There is no reason to buy intel's locked ones when AMD offers equal performance at same price with OC-ability. Those unlocked ones may prove to be stronger, but price premium intel asks for unlocked chips ...

And I really wonder if intel improved IPC that much this time, so they can clock them so low.

RzrTrek
Senior Member



Posts: 2549
Joined: 2012-04-16

#5453304 Posted on: 07/17/2017 07:43 PM
So where are all the fanboys saying 4 cores for gaming is enough?
An i5 with 6 cores? How intel has changed this year...
My 2500k is still running strong, haven't even pushed more than 4.0Ghz on it.
Wont upgrade for less than 6c/16t and everyone knows i7 are overpriced BS so I know where's my money going (for now).
Also, that 8400 at 2.8Ghz...unless it turbos to 4Ghz, it will be in trouble.
I couldn't have said it better myself, why spend twice the amount of money on i7's for a minimal performance gain in games or Ryzen that can barley overclock?

WareTernal
Senior Member



Posts: 259
Joined: 2013-09-27

#5453308 Posted on: 07/17/2017 07:53 PM
Nowadays the clock speeds should be at least 4Ghz minimum.


id love a 6 or 8 core with min base clock of 4ghz, not going to settle for less


I don't care about clock speed, but what I do care about is performance. I would actually prefer a higher performance part at a lower clock speed. I think higher clock speeds are the most primitive and simplistic way of achieving higher performance. Eventually you can't manufacture parts on a smaller process, and you can't practically deal with the excess heat produced by simply upping the clocks. I can't think of an Intel part that didn't perform better than the previous generation at the same clock speed.
It's not new or uncommon for new architectures to have better performance than previous architectures at the same clock speed. Remember when the Athlon64 came along and had much better performance than Intel's Pentium D at lower clocks, then Core2 came along and had much better performance than Athlon64 at lower clocks.
Megahertz has been a marketing gimmick. AMD tried to move away from it with their AthlonXP chips, using names like "3200+" for a 2.2Ghz part. AMD claimed their architecture was different than Intel's and couldn't be compared using just clock speed. They were right, and the same applies to different architectures within the Intel family.

15 pages « 2 3 4 5 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023