How to: Firmware Update the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
Promo: Microsoft Office 2016 for $29.82
Intel reports record turnover and doubles up on profit
Intel reached a new high as they had a record revenues of $ 14.8 billion USD in the second quarter of this year. That is a 9 percent growth over the same period in 2016.
The quarterly profit has risen from $ 1.3 billion ($ 1.11 billion) last year to $ 2.8 billion (2.4 billion) in the past three months. Thuis Intels profits have been doubled.
The revenues increases mainly are based on, among other things, to the growth in data centers. Revenues totaled $ 4.4 billion (3.77 billion), 9 percent more than a year earlier. Intel exceeded expectations of analysts with its quarterly figures.
The strong results make Intel positive about the expectations for the rest of the year. The company expects an annual turnover of $ 61.3 billion. A good 1.3 billion dollars more than previously anticipated.
Intel Releases C0 Stepping Atom C2000 Processors To Fix Problems - 04/27/2017 09:35 AM
Intel has released a new version of their Atom C2000 processors, the previous models had an issue that could brick your device if it had the proc, say a NAS. There was an issue with the clock generato...
Intel Releases Model Numbers Xeon Gold and Platinum-processors - 04/27/2017 08:32 AM
Intel is to release 34 Xeon processors with the new naming schema, fourteen Platinum and Twenty Gold edition processors. These are server processors intended for the Skylake-SP platform. The biggest m...
Intel Reacts to Ryzen with new Kaby Lake Core i5 7640k and i7 7740K Processors - 02/07/2017 09:24 AM
It does seem that the pending AMD Ryzen launch will stir the processor arena, Intel certainly is reacting. From the looks of it Intel will respin their Kaby Lake series with high clocked models and th...
Intel Releases Non K Skylake processors - 09/02/2015 07:57 AM
Intel today adds many new processors in their desktop, laptop and small form factor Skylake series. For Desktop there are seven new CPUs. Based on LGA1151 sockets these processors work with the new 10...
Razer Intel RealSense Camera for VR and Game Streamers - 08/19/2015 08:52 AM
Razer is working with Intel to deliver a consumer-ready desktop and VR-enabled camera based on Intel RealSense technology for a wide range of experiential applications....
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 7723
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 7723
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5456997 Posted on: 07/29/2017 11:36 PM
Aura89
Did you even read thread? If not, that makes you third one that posts this video.
It's that important
Well its been proven. There is a YouTube video linked here, made by a Scottish guy using Wikipedia as his credible source from the start. Get out the tin foil hats
I'm sorry that you don't like facts? If you had actually watched the video, which i doubt considering your response, you'd have known that all he did was put the information, the facts, out there. No conclusions made by him, just the facts. If you think facts are for "tin foil hat" people, then you're also probably one of those people who claim "FAKE NEWS!" because the news is something you do not agree with/like/want to believe is fake. That's pretty sad if you ask me.
Aura89
Did you even read thread? If not, that makes you third one that posts this video.
It's that important
Well its been proven. There is a YouTube video linked here, made by a Scottish guy using Wikipedia as his credible source from the start. Get out the tin foil hats
I'm sorry that you don't like facts? If you had actually watched the video, which i doubt considering your response, you'd have known that all he did was put the information, the facts, out there. No conclusions made by him, just the facts. If you think facts are for "tin foil hat" people, then you're also probably one of those people who claim "FAKE NEWS!" because the news is something you do not agree with/like/want to believe is fake. That's pretty sad if you ask me.
chronek
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 2016-09-19
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 2016-09-19
#5457003 Posted on: 07/29/2017 11:56 PM
Yes it works, but when ms os, dx api, drivers, games and other software compiled by ms visual works like - if genuineintel then run optimized code, if not then use slowest code (because intel paying for that for last 40 years), then maybe amd should find alternative so noone would say "amd is bad in games".
Btw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osSMJRyxG0k
AMD have no reason to either when Windows 10 works well with their hardware and GPU wise actually favours it so far.
Yes it works, but when ms os, dx api, drivers, games and other software compiled by ms visual works like - if genuineintel then run optimized code, if not then use slowest code (because intel paying for that for last 40 years), then maybe amd should find alternative so noone would say "amd is bad in games".
Btw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osSMJRyxG0k
Redemption80
Senior Member
Posts: 18355
Joined: 2009-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 18355
Joined: 2009-01-06
#5457007 Posted on: 07/30/2017 12:36 AM
But when current MS OS and api's all currently favour AMD, your argument falls over.
Intel's bad business practices should not be used as as diversion/distraction for poor products.
When AMD release a good product they do well, when they release crap they do crap.
Guiting people into buying something inferior because might work on the gullible, but it doesn't work on me.
But when current MS OS and api's all currently favour AMD, your argument falls over.
Intel's bad business practices should not be used as as diversion/distraction for poor products.
When AMD release a good product they do well, when they release crap they do crap.
Guiting people into buying something inferior because might work on the gullible, but it doesn't work on me.
chronek
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 2016-09-19
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 2016-09-19
#5457088 Posted on: 07/30/2017 08:58 AM
You mean when os and software run optimized on intel and slowest posible code on amd then it means it favours amd? I not get your logic.
But when current MS OS and api's all currently favour AMD, your argument falls over.
You mean when os and software run optimized on intel and slowest posible code on amd then it means it favours amd? I not get your logic.
Exascale
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2017-06-09
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2017-06-09
#5457168 Posted on: 07/30/2017 04:41 PM
I honestly couldn't care less, if they sell something I want at a price I like then I will buy it.
The 2600k is the best piece of PC hardware that I've owned.
That mentality is exactly what has destroyed the economies of the USA, Australia and Europe and lead to capital flight, conflict resource proliferation which funds genocide and the modern slave trade, and has created a race to the bottom mentality for product quality.
The 2600K is nice for 2011 era CPUs. It shows just how little Intel progressed in the consumer space since then.
Now that AMD has released Ryzen and is beating Intel in value enormously, you have rushed releases of LGA2066 and 6 core LGA1151s. Considering that AMD has 4 core 8 thread CPUs with 2x the memory bandwidth of a 2600k it might be time to modernize.
I honestly couldn't care less, if they sell something I want at a price I like then I will buy it.
The 2600k is the best piece of PC hardware that I've owned.
That mentality is exactly what has destroyed the economies of the USA, Australia and Europe and lead to capital flight, conflict resource proliferation which funds genocide and the modern slave trade, and has created a race to the bottom mentality for product quality.
The 2600K is nice for 2011 era CPUs. It shows just how little Intel progressed in the consumer space since then.
Now that AMD has released Ryzen and is beating Intel in value enormously, you have rushed releases of LGA2066 and 6 core LGA1151s. Considering that AMD has 4 core 8 thread CPUs with 2x the memory bandwidth of a 2600k it might be time to modernize.
Redemption80
Senior Member
Posts: 18355
Joined: 2009-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 18355
Joined: 2009-01-06
#5457170 Posted on: 07/30/2017 04:51 PM
Enough of the do i say, not as i do. Change the record.
Expecting people to pay for something they do not like or want is crazy.
We live in capitalist world full of socialists lol.
Yes, the 2600k is definitely due an upgrade but the argument was the value i've managed to get from it.
Enough of the do i say, not as i do. Change the record.
Expecting people to pay for something they do not like or want is crazy.
We live in capitalist world full of socialists lol.
Yes, the 2600k is definitely due an upgrade but the argument was the value i've managed to get from it.
Exascale
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2017-06-09
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: 2017-06-09
#5457197 Posted on: 07/30/2017 06:31 PM
I didnt say to buy something you dont like or dont want. Im saying that buying based solely on price ruins the market. If you look at the consumer electronics landscape, it has gotten pretty bad as a result of consumers' buying habits.
Even if you dont plan on buying AMD anything, the fact that they're making better CPUs than Intel now has already forced Intel to release 6 core small socket CPUs finally.
I didnt say to buy something you dont like or dont want. Im saying that buying based solely on price ruins the market. If you look at the consumer electronics landscape, it has gotten pretty bad as a result of consumers' buying habits.
Even if you dont plan on buying AMD anything, the fact that they're making better CPUs than Intel now has already forced Intel to release 6 core small socket CPUs finally.
Andrew LB
Senior Member
Posts: 1066
Joined: 2012-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1066
Joined: 2012-05-22
#5457205 Posted on: 07/30/2017 07:12 PM
No, they're not. Otherwise they'd receive MASSIVE fines by the Securites and Exchange Commission (SEC). Quarterly earnings reports are highly regulated because this is one of the main factors used in evaluating stock price, credit ratings, and taxes paid to the Government.
I bet those stats are deliberately inflated by them.
No, they're not. Otherwise they'd receive MASSIVE fines by the Securites and Exchange Commission (SEC). Quarterly earnings reports are highly regulated because this is one of the main factors used in evaluating stock price, credit ratings, and taxes paid to the Government.
Redemption80
Senior Member
Posts: 18355
Joined: 2009-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 18355
Joined: 2009-01-06
#5457229 Posted on: 07/30/2017 08:45 PM
I didnt say to buy something you dont like or dont want. Im saying that buying based solely on price ruins the market. If you look at the consumer electronics landscape, it has gotten pretty bad as a result of consumers' buying habits.
Even if you dont plan on buying AMD anything, the fact that they're making better CPUs than Intel now has already forced Intel to release 6 core small socket CPUs finally.
It's never solely on price, if a product fits with what I want but isn't priced correctly I'm just not going to get it.
If anything I think it's the people with no consideration about price who do the most damage.
I do plan on buying AMD again, things are looking good for them again and I'm back interested in their CPUs.
Less so with GPU's though.
I didnt say to buy something you dont like or dont want. Im saying that buying based solely on price ruins the market. If you look at the consumer electronics landscape, it has gotten pretty bad as a result of consumers' buying habits.
Even if you dont plan on buying AMD anything, the fact that they're making better CPUs than Intel now has already forced Intel to release 6 core small socket CPUs finally.
It's never solely on price, if a product fits with what I want but isn't priced correctly I'm just not going to get it.
If anything I think it's the people with no consideration about price who do the most damage.
I do plan on buying AMD again, things are looking good for them again and I'm back interested in their CPUs.
Less so with GPU's though.
Chechar51
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: 2013-04-26
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: 2013-04-26
#5457256 Posted on: 07/30/2017 10:04 PM
must be a lie, AdoredTV already said intel is dead(?)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3l9vZD7h-8
must be a lie, AdoredTV already said intel is dead(?)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3l9vZD7h-8
RavenMaster
Senior Member
Posts: 1099
Joined: 2009-08-19
Senior Member
Posts: 1099
Joined: 2009-08-19
#5457270 Posted on: 07/30/2017 11:11 PM
Well, now they have Ryzen to contend with and its rapidly eating into their market share. I think 2017 will yield VERY different financial results for Intel.
Well, now they have Ryzen to contend with and its rapidly eating into their market share. I think 2017 will yield VERY different financial results for Intel.
GhostXL
Senior Member
Posts: 6009
Joined: 2004-10-30
Senior Member
Posts: 6009
Joined: 2004-10-30
#5457278 Posted on: 07/31/2017 12:21 AM
I don't see why people think Intel is in trouble.
I mean I preferred AMD back in the Athlon 64 days.
I liked the chips..they were faster as well. But AMD isn't at Intel level yet. People will still want Intel for gaming.
I know that is what I primarily do with my PC so until I see AMD pull ahead at the same price point (I do like Ryzen), I won't be moving to AMD just yet.
It's competition. Good competition. Just don't assume bad things from a good thing. Look Intel needs competition, if they don't have it, we will be stuck with 5% increments in the coming years instead of 15%.
I don't see why people think Intel is in trouble.
I mean I preferred AMD back in the Athlon 64 days.
I liked the chips..they were faster as well. But AMD isn't at Intel level yet. People will still want Intel for gaming.
I know that is what I primarily do with my PC so until I see AMD pull ahead at the same price point (I do like Ryzen), I won't be moving to AMD just yet.
It's competition. Good competition. Just don't assume bad things from a good thing. Look Intel needs competition, if they don't have it, we will be stuck with 5% increments in the coming years instead of 15%.
Chillin
Senior Member
Posts: 6814
Joined: 2006-01-18
Senior Member
Posts: 6814
Joined: 2006-01-18
#5457457 Posted on: 07/31/2017 02:32 PM
Rapid...Talk about delusional.
AMD themselves said that they are optimistic about maybe reaching 10% market share in 4 quarters, that's a whole year, in the server market. And that doesn't mean they're eating exclusively into Intel's shares there either.
Well, now they have Ryzen to contend with and its rapidly eating into their market share. I think 2017 will yield VERY different financial results for Intel.
Rapid...Talk about delusional.
AMD themselves said that they are optimistic about maybe reaching 10% market share in 4 quarters, that's a whole year, in the server market. And that doesn't mean they're eating exclusively into Intel's shares there either.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12496
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12496
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5457466 Posted on: 07/31/2017 02:41 PM
Rapid...Talk about delusional.
AMD themselves said that they are optimistic about maybe reaching 10% market share in 4 quarters, that's a whole year, in the server market. And that doesn't mean they're eating exclusively into Intel's shares there either.
Yeah, the problem with the server market is that Intel has a massive amount of inertia there. Some companies will wait an entire generation just to make sure the architecture doesn't have any unknown flaws and others won't want to divvy up it's systems between Intel/AMD. They'll buy what they know.
That's why I said earlier on that like, even when K8 came out and resoundingly defeated Intel in literally every category - it still took 4 years for AMD to match Intel's marketshare. And that was in the consumer space which is a lot more dynamic then server.
Rapid...Talk about delusional.
AMD themselves said that they are optimistic about maybe reaching 10% market share in 4 quarters, that's a whole year, in the server market. And that doesn't mean they're eating exclusively into Intel's shares there either.
Yeah, the problem with the server market is that Intel has a massive amount of inertia there. Some companies will wait an entire generation just to make sure the architecture doesn't have any unknown flaws and others won't want to divvy up it's systems between Intel/AMD. They'll buy what they know.
That's why I said earlier on that like, even when K8 came out and resoundingly defeated Intel in literally every category - it still took 4 years for AMD to match Intel's marketshare. And that was in the consumer space which is a lot more dynamic then server.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6664
Joined: 2010-11-16
yeah screw React OS and screw Linux.
real men use TempleOS
xXNCJiDzhWs