TerraMaster F5-422 NAS Review
Radeon RX 6600 (Sapphire Pulse) review
Radeon RX 6600 (Gigabyte Eagle 8G) review
PowerColor Radeon RX 6900 XT Red Devil review
Corsair Sabre RGB Pro Wireless mouse review
Far Cry 6: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 Bilibili 12G review
ACER Predator GM7000 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
be quiet! Shadow Rock SLIM 2 review
Asrock B550 PG Riptide review
Intel reduces prices for Core 9000 series F (no IGP) range + Xeon W 2200 Range
Last week you've already seen the many-core Core X announcements, however intel ahd another surprize left, as they are lowering prices for the 9000 series.
The price reduction runs from 5 to even 20%, the price cut is specifically aimed at the processors without integrated GPU, or the IGP that is disabled I should say. That means all processors in the 9000 series and name ending with the letter F apply. The biggest drop in price can are the low-cost procs, Core i3 9100F is 20% cheaper and the i5 9400F 14%. The more expensive Core i7s and i9s processors drop is 5 to 8 percent bringing them closer to3wards AMD Ryzen processors.
| Cores | Old price | New price | Difference % | Unlocked | Hyper-Threading | TDP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9 9900KF | 8 | $ 488 | $ 463 | 5 | Yes | Yes | 95 W |
| Intel Core i7 9700KF | 8 | $ 374 | $ 349 | 7 | Yes | No | 95 W |
| Intel Core i7 9700F | 8 | $ 323 | $ 298 | 8 | No | No | 65 W |
| Intel Core i5 9600KF | 6 | $ 262 | $ 237 | 10 | Yes | No | 95 W |
| Intel Core i5 9500F | 6 | $ 192 | $ 167 | 13 | No | No | 65 W |
| Intel Core i5 9400F | 6 | $ 182 | $ 157 | 14 | No | No | 65 W |
| Intel Core i3 9350KF | 4 | $ 173 | $ 148 | 14 | Yes | No | 91 W |
| Intel Core i3 9100F | 4 | $ 122 | $ 97 | 20 | No | No | 65 W |
Intel also is introducing its workstation-specific Xeon W processors with eight 2200-series chips priced from $294 to $1,333 up-to 18-cores, based on the latest Cascade Lake architecture. Below an overview of the new procs, clock on the thumbnails to enlarge.
Intel Rendering Framework and Intel Xe architecture poised to advance studio workflows - 05/01/2019 10:00 AM
Xe architecture roadmap for data center optimized rendering includes ray tracing hardware acceleration support for the Intel Rendering Framework family of API’s and libraries....
Intel Reports First-Quarter 2019 Financial Results - 04/26/2019 08:34 AM
Intel Corporation today reported first-quarter 2019 financial results. "Results for the first quarter were slightly higher than our January expectations. ...
Intel releases Core i9-9980HK laptop processor with eight cores - 04/23/2019 04:34 PM
Intel today launches their ninth generation of Core H processors for laptops, the top end model has been fitted with 8-cores running one or two threads up-to 5 GHz.. ...
Intel releases Thunderbolt to the industry - To Become USB 4.0 at 40 Gbps - 03/04/2019 05:04 PM
Intel announced that it has contributed the Thunderbolt protocol specification to the USB Promoter Group. This will enable other chip makers to build Thunderbolt compatible silicon, royalty free. It w...
Intel Releases Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2018 Financial Results - 01/25/2019 08:47 AM
Intel reported fourth-quarter and full-year 2018 financial results. The company also announced that its board of directors has approved a five percent increase in its cash dividend to $1.26 per-share ...
illrigger
Senior Member
Posts: 289
Joined: 2017-02-16
Senior Member
Posts: 289
Joined: 2017-02-16
#5717907 Posted on: 10/07/2019 09:20 PM
Basically, yeah. They are directly competing with Ryzen 3000 prices, since they also don't have an iGPU. And by "directly competing" I mean they made prices more similar even though the AMD chips have SMT and Intel doesn't at most of them. Which is a little sad because some of the latest games are actually getting starved for threads on the i5 vs Ryzen 3000 when using a high end GPU, and there's literally no reason why Intel can't enable HT on the i5. They could be wiping the floor value wise with the Ryzen 3600, but they specifically choose not to for some reason.
I cannot be bothered to compare whats what - are they reducing BECAUSE they have no IGP?
Basically, yeah. They are directly competing with Ryzen 3000 prices, since they also don't have an iGPU. And by "directly competing" I mean they made prices more similar even though the AMD chips have SMT and Intel doesn't at most of them. Which is a little sad because some of the latest games are actually getting starved for threads on the i5 vs Ryzen 3000 when using a high end GPU, and there's literally no reason why Intel can't enable HT on the i5. They could be wiping the floor value wise with the Ryzen 3600, but they specifically choose not to for some reason.
Deleted member 271771
Unregistered
Unregistered
#5717992 Posted on: 10/08/2019 05:21 AM
I can think of one. Who is gonna buy an i3 or an i7 if they do that? We can all speculate as much as we want, but the bean-counters have spoken on this one.
and there's literally no reason why Intel can't enable HT on the i5
I can think of one. Who is gonna buy an i3 or an i7 if they do that? We can all speculate as much as we want, but the bean-counters have spoken on this one.
americoliveira
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2016-03-17
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2016-03-17
#5718003 Posted on: 10/08/2019 07:40 AM
They dropped 25 dollars on each, certainly that the margin in the 9900kf is much bigger
They dropped 25 dollars on each, certainly that the margin in the 9900kf is much bigger
asturur
Senior Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: 2010-05-12
Senior Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: 2010-05-12
#5718039 Posted on: 10/08/2019 10:06 AM
Do you think the difference between a i9600k ( i5 with gpu ) with HT enabled, and a 3600 without gpu, would be so much to be defined as floor wiping?
the i5 9600k is priced between a 3600x and a 3700, so it would cost more than a 3600, offering more game performance ( with HT ) but costing more for a non useful iGpu.
Basically, yeah. They are directly competing with Ryzen 3000 prices, since they also don't have an iGPU. And by "directly competing" I mean they made prices more similar even though the AMD chips have SMT and Intel doesn't at most of them. Which is a little sad because some of the latest games are actually getting starved for threads on the i5 vs Ryzen 3000 when using a high end GPU, and there's literally no reason why Intel can't enable HT on the i5. They could be wiping the floor value wise with the Ryzen 3600, but they specifically choose not to for some reason.
Do you think the difference between a i9600k ( i5 with gpu ) with HT enabled, and a 3600 without gpu, would be so much to be defined as floor wiping?
the i5 9600k is priced between a 3600x and a 3700, so it would cost more than a 3600, offering more game performance ( with HT ) but costing more for a non useful iGpu.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 369
Joined: 2016-12-29
I cannot be bothered to compare whats what - are they reducing BECAUSE they have no IGP?