Intel Raptor Lake ES is 9% faster in Single-Core Performance over Alder Lake
Extreme Player, a Chinese PC enthusiast who has access to an engineering sample (ES) of the Core i9-13900K CPU, put it through a series of simulated tests and found that it performs better than the i9-12900K.
The results of the CPU-Z Bench single-core test show that it is 9.41 percent faster than the i9-12900K. The CPU has 36 MB of L3 cache and 32 MB of L2 cache, for a total of 68 MB, are carried by the CPU. It also has a TDP (PL1) of 125W and an Max TDP of around 250W. This chip looks to be operating at a frequency of 3.0 GHz with a boost to 5.5 GHz, but it also shows a boost of up to 5.7 GHz; thus, we may anticipate comparable speeds in the final product. The consumer processor is anticipated to feature a single core Boost of up to 5.75 GHz to 5.8 GHz.
Intel already claimed that the "Raptor Cove" performance cores are better than "Golden Cove" P-cores when it comes to improving IPC from one generation to the next. According to the reviewer, the 13900K is 10% quicker in single-core testing than the 12900KF and up to 35% faster in multi-threaded tasks. The results vary depending on the test, but Raptor Lake looks to be 46.34 percent faster in multi-core CPU-Z than Alder Lake CPU, but also 22 percent faster in Geekbench 5 MT. Raptor Lake's performance gain is mostly due to faster clocks. In the CPU-Z test, both CPUs tested at the same frequency get almost similar results. Despite utilizing a 360 AIO cooler, the 13900K hit 100°C peak temperature and started to throttle in Intel's XTU tool. Furthermore, the PL4 (package) power is said to have reached 420W.
Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake processors are anticipated to debut with the Z790 platform in October 2022. These CPUs will compete with AMD's Ryzen 7000 CPUs, which will be released around the same time.
Lekaed Intel Raptor Lake Slide Shows DDR5-5600, More PCIe Lanes - 07/06/2022 09:07 AM
For some time, Intel's 13th Generation Core CPUs and accompanying platforms have been known. Raptor Lake-S will boost the amount of energy-efficient Gracemont cores from eight to sixteen. For individ...
Rumor: Intel Raptor Lake and Sapphire Rapids processors will be available in October - 05/27/2022 07:09 PM
The next Intel HEDT and desktop processors, Sapphire Rapids and Raptor Lake, would be introduced in October, a year after Alder Lake, according to the well-known leaker Enthusiastic Citizen....
Intel raptor Lake Caches Confirmed through leaked CPU-Z screenshot - 05/19/2022 08:43 AM
Intel's 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake-S desktop processor has 68 MB of L2 and L3 on-die caches. Raptor Lake-S" is a 24-core/32-thread processor with eight Raptor Cove performance cores and sixteen ...
Rumor: Massive Cache Size Increase for Intel Raptor Lake Processors - 01/17/2022 09:56 AM
Intel's Raptor Lake-S desktop processor would contain up to 68 MB of "total cache" (L2 and L3 cache). In consonance with what AMD is doing with the pending Ryzen 7 5800X3D and 3D Ver...
Alleged lineup of Intel Raptor Lake CPUs appears - upto 24 cores / turbo boost 5.5 GHz - 08/19/2021 07:34 AM
According to reports, Intel's future Raptor Lake chips will have a diverse range of features. The processors can have up to 24 cores and 32 threads. The announcement of Raptor Lake is planned to take...
Senior Member
Posts: 1029
Joined: 2015-06-27
You completely misunderstood the test. The point of it is to see how powerful those e-cores are. That's it.
As I said that comparison is not valid and even than they plenty fast for 120fps
Senior Member
Posts: 6891
Joined: 2013-02-05
I seen this video, for starters its missing comparison vs zen2/3 and intel previous gen , it compares to fastest IPC on earth as of July 2022
Second there are zero games that need to use E-cores because 8 P-cores are not enough.
Third, in his demonstration that %1 and 0.1% were above 60 which is fine for most people, the top speed was above 120FPS which is the most popular refresh rate and if you game on TV thats the only option.
also it was 1080p, the higher you go the higher the GPU bottleneck, i game in 4K/120 , i bet that for my resolution and refresh on my 3090, i wont see any difference between 8 P-cores vs 8 E-Cores.
For now while windows scheduler is not optimized, most motherboard manufacturers let you set scroll lock button to disable E-Cores for gaming, so if you afraid that e-cores can screw your FPS press this button and load your game, problem solved.
Im sure that Microsoft will solve this issue, this is new technology and eventually tehre wont be any need to do it manually
You completely misunderstood the test. The point of it is to see how powerful those e-cores are. That's it.
P.S.: You don't need to quote me twice. There is an edit button. And even a delete button.