Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs
Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
G.Skill TridentZ Royal Elite DDR4 3600 MHz CL14 review
Corsair HS80 RGB Wireless Headset review
Intel Mentions 900P 960GB and 1.5TB
Bigger sized Intel optane units are mentioned in a PCN list (product notification) the 900P from Intel would see a model with a 960GB and massive 1.5TB capacity.
The PCN doesn’t contain much more information besides the new capacities mentioned myce. The Intel 900P series SSDs are the company’s consumer-level Optane drives, targeted at enthusiasts. The 280GB drive sells for around $400, the 480GB drive around $600. Prices of the 900P in new capacities are not known yet. Intel has not released any information on the release date of these new drives, however, the PCN states that Intel customers should be ready for the product changes by the 27th of December this year.
Sources: MYCE.com, via Tom's Hardware, Intel PCN PDF
Gigabyte Implements Safety Measures Against Intel ME And TXE Security Vulnerabilities - 11/22/2017 09:25 AM
Gigabyte has implemented safety measures aligned with Intel’s response to the Intel Management Engine (ME) and Intel Trusted Execution Engine (TXE) security vulnerabilities...
Intel merges Mobile and PC Desktop devision - 11/19/2014 10:13 AM
Intel is struggling to gain a foothold in mobile computing, is merging its mobile phone and tablet businesses with the division that makes chips for personal computers. The reorganization of the two u...
Intel Merrifield SoC benchmark scores online - 12/31/2012 03:04 PM
Interesting, some benchmark score of Intel's Redhookbay, which is equipped with a dual-core Merrifield SoC (for smartphones), hit the web. In the graphics performance oriented NenaMark2 the chip a...
Intel Medfield SoC Power and Performance leaks - 12/27/2011 02:25 PM
Intel officially introduces its next-generation Atom processors for mobile devices, code named Medfield at CES, the first performance figures regarding this system-on-a-chip (SoC) device were leaked o...
Taiwanese firms pessimistic about Intel Medfield - 12/18/2011 04:22 PM
DigiTimes reports Taiwanese smartphone and tablet PC makers are not going bonkers for Intel's 32nm "Medfield" Atom processor. Because Intel did not establish close partnerships with first-ti...
nizzen
Senior Member
Posts: 1492
Joined: 2005-08-05
Senior Member
Posts: 1492
Joined: 2005-08-05
#5501583 Posted on: 12/15/2017 11:58 AM
Prize is low, compare to it's performance @ 4k qd=1.
Capacity IS the problem. I have 3x 900p 480GB now
Capacity isn't really the massive thing here. The price is.
Prize is low, compare to it's performance @ 4k qd=1.
Capacity IS the problem. I have 3x 900p 480GB now
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2007-05-31
#5501586 Posted on: 12/15/2017 12:07 PM
price is not too expensive for pro (think that my pro GPU cost more than 6000 Euro, ECC mem cost more than x3 normal mem etc...)
Capacity isn't really the massive thing here. The price is.
price is not too expensive for pro (think that my pro GPU cost more than 6000 Euro, ECC mem cost more than x3 normal mem etc...)
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 2559
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2559
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5501598 Posted on: 12/15/2017 01:23 PM
Prize is low, compare to it's performance @ 4k qd=1.
Capacity IS the problem. I have 3x 900p 480GB now
price is not too expensive for pro (think that my pro GPU cost more than 6000 Euro, ECC mem cost more than x3 normal mem etc...)
Compared to you guys, I'm a far more miserly PC builder. For me personally the price looks too high. I'd be quite interested in Optane if the price wasn't that much higher than the regular NAND drives boast, that is, if it was ready for the massmarket. Perhaps it never will be.
Prize is low, compare to it's performance @ 4k qd=1.
Capacity IS the problem. I have 3x 900p 480GB now
price is not too expensive for pro (think that my pro GPU cost more than 6000 Euro, ECC mem cost more than x3 normal mem etc...)
Compared to you guys, I'm a far more miserly PC builder. For me personally the price looks too high. I'd be quite interested in Optane if the price wasn't that much higher than the regular NAND drives boast, that is, if it was ready for the massmarket. Perhaps it never will be.
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2007-05-31
#5501690 Posted on: 12/15/2017 06:33 PM
you are not... at home i still have my G3258 under the TV, and very happy of it despite i think that a Ryzen APU might replace it in future
Optane full pack is intended for pro and so the high price (like the quadro or firepro gpu).
Optane for main consumer (the big cache lol) bring almost nothing despite bringing lot on the paper over regular.
btw there is other solution than optane that are on dev that are aimed mainstream and work with both Intel and AMD.
Compared to you guys, I'm a far more miserly PC builder. For me personally the price looks too high. I'd be quite interested in Optane if the price wasn't that much higher than the regular NAND drives boast, that is, if it was ready for the massmarket. Perhaps it never will be.
you are not... at home i still have my G3258 under the TV, and very happy of it despite i think that a Ryzen APU might replace it in future
Optane full pack is intended for pro and so the high price (like the quadro or firepro gpu).
Optane for main consumer (the big cache lol) bring almost nothing despite bringing lot on the paper over regular.
btw there is other solution than optane that are on dev that are aimed mainstream and work with both Intel and AMD.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2559
Joined: 2013-03-10
Capacity isn't really the massive thing here. The price is.