MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
ADATA SE800 1TB Portable SSD review
Promo: Microsoft Office 2016 for $29.82
Corsair H100i RGB Pro XT liquid cooler review
Intel launches eleven 10nm 'Ice Lake' laptop processors
Ice Lake laptops processors are officially introduced today, eleven models will end up in at least thirty-five different laptops between now and the Q4 holiday season. The Ice Lake-U and Ice Lake-Y chips will get TDPs of 15-25 and 9-12 watts respectively.
Intel claims that this new generation will offer an increased IPC of 18 percent thanks to architectural changes. Next, to that the IGPs have been beefed up and will make a large step forwards in performance. Depending on whether a model name ends in G1, G4 or G7, you will receive an integrated GPU with 32, 48 or 64 execution units, the new IGP is labeled IRIS Plus. The EUs are considerably more than the maximum of 24 units embedded into the existing processors. The GPUs will also support adaptive sync. There will be Ice Lake processors in the Core i3, i5 and i7 series with up to four cores and with TDPs of 9, 15 or 28 watts. All processors have an integrated WiFi 6 controller (AX WIFI) and a USB-C controller that can control up to four Thunderbolt 3 connections. The Ice Lake processors support lpddr4 (x) -3733 memory and ddr4-3200.
The Ice Lake-U series are to be as follows; Core i5 and i7 models are all quad cores. Te Core i3-1005G1 has two cores. The most advanced model, the Core i7-1068G7, has a single-core turbo of 4.1 GHz and an all-core turbo of 3.6 GHz but does come at a higher TDP at 28 Watt. With the Ice Lake-Y cpus the specified clock speeds are lower. These processors will often are used in thin laptops that offer less space in terms of cooling to make maximum use of the turbo.
Intel did not comment or announce any 10nm deskstop processors.
Intel Launches Ethernet 800 Series 100GbE Network PCIe Cards - 04/05/2019 07:21 AM
While consumers all are still in their 1 GigE LAN era (with a glimpse of 2.5, 5 and 10 GigE in vicinity), Intel is already moving to 100 GBit/s adapters as they announced a new series of professional...
Intel Launches Next-Gen Acceleration Card to Deliver 5G - 02/25/2019 08:03 AM
Intel announced the Intel FPGA Programmable Acceleration Card N3000 (Intel FPGA PAC N3000), designed for service providers to enable 5G next-generation core and virtualized radio access network soluti...
Intel Lakefield CPU Combines fast and economical cores - 01/08/2019 10:04 AM
Intel has been talking about Lakefield, the processor will use different stacked CPU cores inside the package, making it a hybrid design based on Foveros technology. The processor only measures 12 by ...
Intel Launches Graphics Twitter Handle and New Video - 08/15/2018 09:03 PM
Intel posted a new video, promising a dedicated graphics card by 2020. Intel would like to keep you abreast of the latest development of Intel in graphics. At Siggraph, their team is starting a new Tw...
Intel Launches New Generation Xeon E Processor Family - 07/12/2018 05:58 PM
Intel today announced the release of the new Intel Xeon E-2100 processor. The Intel Xeon E processor, successor to the Intel Xeon E3 processor, is designed for entry-level workstations that provide cr...
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 1019
Joined: 2013-06-04
Senior Member
Posts: 1019
Joined: 2013-06-04
#5696257 Posted on: 08/01/2019 02:42 PM
Let's be honest: most consumers don't actually look at that.
Girls just want white wile dudes just want something black. Dad pays for it.
i7-1068G7 - very consumer friendly to remember this exact processor name 
Let's be honest: most consumers don't actually look at that.
Girls just want white wile dudes just want something black. Dad pays for it.
Stairmand
Senior Member
Posts: 148
Joined: 2007-07-25
Senior Member
Posts: 148
Joined: 2007-07-25
#5696318 Posted on: 08/01/2019 05:00 PM
Integrated WiFi? How strange.
Integrated WiFi? How strange.
Caesar
Senior Member
Posts: 893
Joined: 2015-06-18
Senior Member
Posts: 893
Joined: 2015-06-18
#5696319 Posted on: 08/01/2019 05:00 PM
Most cores of my i7 9700k "are" dormant (and still no HT) .....as the true benefits of the multiple processor's core(s) to be seen, the software that is running on the computer must be written to support it....
IMO, the majority of consumers will see no tangible benefits from going beyond new processor(s) as there is so little non-specialized software that can take advantage of it. Anyway, there may be people who can consider such processors as new build but "not" for upgrade...
Most cores of my i7 9700k "are" dormant (and still no HT) .....as the true benefits of the multiple processor's core(s) to be seen, the software that is running on the computer must be written to support it....
IMO, the majority of consumers will see no tangible benefits from going beyond new processor(s) as there is so little non-specialized software that can take advantage of it. Anyway, there may be people who can consider such processors as new build but "not" for upgrade...
coth
Senior Member
Posts: 412
Joined: 2005-02-23
Senior Member
Posts: 412
Joined: 2005-02-23
#5696330 Posted on: 08/01/2019 05:24 PM
What's strange about integrated WiFi?
Integrated WiFi? How strange.
What's strange about integrated WiFi?
coth
Senior Member
Posts: 412
Joined: 2005-02-23
Senior Member
Posts: 412
Joined: 2005-02-23
#5696338 Posted on: 08/01/2019 05:37 PM
4-core ICL-U is as fast as 6-core CML-U.
supposed to run hot and only 4/8? thanks 9750h is just fine, no regrets.
4-core ICL-U is as fast as 6-core CML-U.
TLD LARS
Senior Member
Posts: 122
Joined: 2017-03-01
Senior Member
Posts: 122
Joined: 2017-03-01
#5696339 Posted on: 08/01/2019 05:37 PM
Most cores of my i7 9700k "are" dormant (and still no HT) .....as the true benefits of the multiple processor's core(s) to be seen, the software that is running on the computer must be written to support it....
IMO, the majority of consumers will see no tangible benefits from going beyond new processor(s) as there is so little non-specialized software that can take advantage of it. Anyway, there may be people who can consider such processors as new build but "not" for upgrade...
Games are beginning to run at 6-8 cores and well optimized editor tools can fill up 8 cores or more.
I am running the 1700 and slowly it is getting better and better, because new games use the extra cores, singlecore stuff is still slow though.
If you do stuff like game and stream with encoding, the extra power needed for the encoding does not hurt you as much on the 9700k as it would on a 9600k.
A lot of the 4-6 core no HT CPUes show bad stuttering in games, if the OS is not super clean or background stuff is running.
Most cores of my i7 9700k "are" dormant (and still no HT) .....as the true benefits of the multiple processor's core(s) to be seen, the software that is running on the computer must be written to support it....
IMO, the majority of consumers will see no tangible benefits from going beyond new processor(s) as there is so little non-specialized software that can take advantage of it. Anyway, there may be people who can consider such processors as new build but "not" for upgrade...
Games are beginning to run at 6-8 cores and well optimized editor tools can fill up 8 cores or more.
I am running the 1700 and slowly it is getting better and better, because new games use the extra cores, singlecore stuff is still slow though.
If you do stuff like game and stream with encoding, the extra power needed for the encoding does not hurt you as much on the 9700k as it would on a 9600k.
A lot of the 4-6 core no HT CPUes show bad stuttering in games, if the OS is not super clean or background stuff is running.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 7721
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 7721
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5696344 Posted on: 08/01/2019 05:58 PM
You have no idea what the speed differences in IPC of ice lake or comet lake are, comet lake is unreleased, and ice lake hasn't been benchmarked.
Even if comet lake has no IPC increase over skylake, which i believe is what people expect, and ice lake has an 18% IPC increase as intel has stated (but hasn't been tested), how exactly does an IPC of 18% increase somehow make a un-disclosed frequency 4-core icelake processor faster then a 6 core comet lake processor?
I state un-disclosed because you didn't state what frequencies they are, so i can only expect that it'll be the same frequency between them.
So, if they were equal, the 6 core comet processor would be 50% faster then the 4-core icelake processor, but then add that 18% IPC increase to icelake and you'd get the 6-core comet lake processor being 32% faster then the 4-core icelake processor, so again, where is your logic, or lack thereof? Ofcourse a 4-core any processor CAN be faster then a 6-core any processor as CLOCK SPEEDS can be drastically different on them, but you didn't say a "4Ghz 4-core ice lake processor is faster then a 3.2Ghz 6-core comet lake processor", which would be moot point anyways. No, you stated simply that all 4-core icelake processors are as fast as a 6-core comet lake processor. Pure nonsense.
Seriously why are you still on these forums when you continue to troll, hard?
4-core ICL-U is as fast as 6-core CML-U.
You have no idea what the speed differences in IPC of ice lake or comet lake are, comet lake is unreleased, and ice lake hasn't been benchmarked.
Even if comet lake has no IPC increase over skylake, which i believe is what people expect, and ice lake has an 18% IPC increase as intel has stated (but hasn't been tested), how exactly does an IPC of 18% increase somehow make a un-disclosed frequency 4-core icelake processor faster then a 6 core comet lake processor?
I state un-disclosed because you didn't state what frequencies they are, so i can only expect that it'll be the same frequency between them.
So, if they were equal, the 6 core comet processor would be 50% faster then the 4-core icelake processor, but then add that 18% IPC increase to icelake and you'd get the 6-core comet lake processor being 32% faster then the 4-core icelake processor, so again, where is your logic, or lack thereof? Ofcourse a 4-core any processor CAN be faster then a 6-core any processor as CLOCK SPEEDS can be drastically different on them, but you didn't say a "4Ghz 4-core ice lake processor is faster then a 3.2Ghz 6-core comet lake processor", which would be moot point anyways. No, you stated simply that all 4-core icelake processors are as fast as a 6-core comet lake processor. Pure nonsense.
Seriously why are you still on these forums when you continue to troll, hard?
coth
Senior Member
Posts: 412
Joined: 2005-02-23
Senior Member
Posts: 412
Joined: 2005-02-23
#5696366 Posted on: 08/01/2019 06:56 PM
Both has been benchmarked around the internet already. Anandtech has quite indepth review and overview.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13954547
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14051899
3750H for comparison, though Intel's high performance will be 1068G7.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13434367
Both has been benchmarked around the internet already. Anandtech has quite indepth review and overview.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13954547
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14051899
3750H for comparison, though Intel's high performance will be 1068G7.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13434367
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 14754
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 14754
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5696388 Posted on: 08/01/2019 07:34 PM
Seriously why are you still on these forums when you continue to troll, hard?
If you feel someone else is trolling, why add to it?
Let's be nice people. Only warning for everyone.
Seriously why are you still on these forums when you continue to troll, hard?
If you feel someone else is trolling, why add to it?
Let's be nice people. Only warning for everyone.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 7721
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 7721
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5696430 Posted on: 08/01/2019 08:45 PM
If you feel someone else is trolling, why add to it?
People believe trolls when no one calls them out for their nonsense. Not everyone who follows these or any forums are educated enough to not get pulled in and believe the pure fabrication that comes out of people like coth.
If you feel someone else is trolling, why add to it?
People believe trolls when no one calls them out for their nonsense. Not everyone who follows these or any forums are educated enough to not get pulled in and believe the pure fabrication that comes out of people like coth.
coth
Senior Member
Posts: 412
Joined: 2005-02-23
Senior Member
Posts: 412
Joined: 2005-02-23
#5696433 Posted on: 08/01/2019 08:49 PM
Aside that you personally don't add anything educated yourself. If you see something not following your agenda, then people are immediately idiots and trolls. It's easier to stick labels rather than being smart and educated.
Aside that you personally don't add anything educated yourself. If you see something not following your agenda, then people are immediately idiots and trolls. It's easier to stick labels rather than being smart and educated.
reb0rn
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 2016-10-27
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 2016-10-27
#5696439 Posted on: 08/01/2019 08:56 PM
Ice lake has a lot architect gains and I am sure IPC is a lot better, BUT can they fix the turbo boost up to ~5ghz?! soonish
because if they can not then IPC alone mean not a lot
Ice lake has a lot architect gains and I am sure IPC is a lot better, BUT can they fix the turbo boost up to ~5ghz?! soonish
because if they can not then IPC alone mean not a lot
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 7721
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 7721
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5696442 Posted on: 08/01/2019 09:06 PM
Not my agenda, it's reality. Anyone here would be able to say that if i had an agenda, it'd be towards AMD, but i did not call you out on anything to do with AMD, this is about intel, and reality. And i did show clear information that shows you are incorrect. I didn't reply to your last post, because it shows irrelevant information. It shows unreleased CPUs that aren't 100% known what they are (no i don't mean naming, i mean what they are actually set up as) or what conditions they were tested in or what actual frequencies were used firmware and etc. as these can and do get reported incorrectly.
As i originally stated, 18% IPC does not equate 50% increase in performance, and your original statement was: "4-core ICL-U is as fast as 6-core CML-U." which by itself is not true. Again, also stated in my original reply, that does not mean a 4 core system can not beat a 6 core system, if the 18% increase in IPC comes also with a higher frequency then obviously it can close that gap, match it, or even do better. But, again, again and again, that's not what you said.
If you want to not be labeled as a troll, then state what you actually mean, because if you ACTUALLY meant that ALL 4-core ICL-U are as fast as 6-core CML-U, that's where the issue is, because that's factually incorrect.
Aside that you personally don't add anything educated yourself. If you see something not following your agenda, then people are immediately idiots and trolls. It's easier to stick labels rather than being smart and educated.
Not my agenda, it's reality. Anyone here would be able to say that if i had an agenda, it'd be towards AMD, but i did not call you out on anything to do with AMD, this is about intel, and reality. And i did show clear information that shows you are incorrect. I didn't reply to your last post, because it shows irrelevant information. It shows unreleased CPUs that aren't 100% known what they are (no i don't mean naming, i mean what they are actually set up as) or what conditions they were tested in or what actual frequencies were used firmware and etc. as these can and do get reported incorrectly.
As i originally stated, 18% IPC does not equate 50% increase in performance, and your original statement was: "4-core ICL-U is as fast as 6-core CML-U." which by itself is not true. Again, also stated in my original reply, that does not mean a 4 core system can not beat a 6 core system, if the 18% increase in IPC comes also with a higher frequency then obviously it can close that gap, match it, or even do better. But, again, again and again, that's not what you said.
If you want to not be labeled as a troll, then state what you actually mean, because if you ACTUALLY meant that ALL 4-core ICL-U are as fast as 6-core CML-U, that's where the issue is, because that's factually incorrect.
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 14754
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 14754
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5696475 Posted on: 08/02/2019 01:25 AM
I love the warning that I gave is not being listened to. So I'm going to try one more time.
Grow up. Stop. If you have nothing nice to say, don't say it at all.
I love the warning that I gave is not being listened to. So I'm going to try one more time.
Grow up. Stop. If you have nothing nice to say, don't say it at all.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11148
Joined: 2014-07-21
i7-1068G7 - very consumer friendly to remember this exact processor name